Pseudolampetis Obenberger, 1926
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/909.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/76278790-341D-2326-E161-FA64FF31FF7F |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Pseudolampetis Obenberger, 1926 |
status |
|
Genus Pseudolampetis Obenberger, 1926 View in CoL
( Fig. 4 View Figs )
Pseudolampetis Obenberger, 1926:99 View in CoL . Type species: Ectinogonia aequatoris Obenberger, 1924 View in CoL (original designation).
Pseudolampetis View in CoL contains 13 species recorded from Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru. Since it was not discussed by Kurosawa (1993), yet recognized at the generic rank by Volkovitsh (2001) and therein related to Ectinogonia View in CoL and Achardella View in CoL , rather than Psiloptera View in CoL or Lampetis View in CoL , I concur that it should be kept as a valid genus rather than a subgenus of Lampetis View in CoL .
The species of Pseudolampetis View in CoL have no published biological data. Frank Hovore (pers. comm.) reported that for the two species of this group he has collected in Ecuador, those from coastal sites in Manabi and Guayas provinces were almost invariably beaten from leguminous trees (probably Mimosaceae : Acacia View in CoL or Prosopis spp. ), mostly from foliage of trees in bloom (small, round yellow blossoms), but also from foliage without flowers and from dead twigs. Larger specimens, and all material from montane sites (1,500 –2,000 m) in Loja Province came from herbaceous vegetation, but not necessarily legumes (although a few were taken beating dead Acacia View in CoL crowns). They seem to sit on foliage of a variety of shrubs and trees, and where an area had been scarred by heavy equipment, leaving only ripped stems and roots exposed in the muddy soils, they often were common on the ripped bits and stems, sometimes sitting on twigs smaller in diameter than themselves. Even when out in the full sun in mid-day they are sluggish and make little attempt to fly away when disturbed.
Conclusion
The placement of the genera discussed herein in the current higher classification scheme of Buprestidae is summarized in the following list adapted from Bellamy (2003). These taxa are the complete component of South American genera in what was formerly referred to as Chalcophorinae : Chalcophorini .
Subfamily CHRYSOCHROINAE Laporte, 1835
Tribe PARALEPTODEMINI Cobos, 1975
Subtribe EUCHROMATINA Ho 1 yński, 1993
Genus EUCHROMA Dejean, 1833
Subtribe HYPOPRASINA Ho 1 yński, 1993
Genus HYPOPRASIS Fairmaire & Germain, 1864
Genus CORDILLERITA Obenberger, 1926 View in CoL
Genus BAUDONISIA Cobos, 1963 View in CoL
Subtribe PRISTIPTERINA Ho 1 yński, 1993
Genus HALECIA Laporte & Gory, 1837
Genus EUPODALECIA Obenberger, 1958
Genus PSEUDALECIA Théry, 1923
Genus PELECOPSELAPHUS Solier, 1833
Genus CHRYSESTHES Dejean, 1833
Subtribe EUPLECTALECIINA Ho 1 yński, 1993
Genus EUPLECTALECIA Obenberger, 1924
Subtribe PARALEPTODEMINA Cobos, 1975
Genus CINYRA Laporte & Gory, 1837
Genus SAUNDERSINA Cobos, 1978
Tribe DICERCINI Gistel, 1848
Subtribe DICERCINA Gistel, 1848
Genus CHALCOPOECILA Saunders, 1871
Genus ACHARDELLA Obenberger, 1926 View in CoL
Genus ECTINOGONIA Spinola, 1837 View in CoL
196
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Pseudolampetis Obenberger, 1926
Bellamy, C. L. 2006 |
Pseudolampetis
Obenberger 1926: 99 |