Eumeninae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.182436 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6227870 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/74608976-FFBC-FFA5-78E2-F8A0FA56F8A1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eumeninae |
status |
|
Subfamily Eumeninae Leach
This is the most species rich subfamily in Iran, as indeed in the entire world. The following key allows separation of all the genera known from Iran. In the key, metasomal terga and sterna are denoted as “TI” for the first tergum, and so forth.
1. Metasoma petiolate: segment I in dorsal view with width half or less that of II, and at least twice as long as wide, usually longer ( Figs. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 21 , 23–25 View FIGURES 22 – 25 )....................................................................................................2 - Metasoma not petiolate: segment I with width more than half that of II, much less than twice as long as wide ( Figs. 19–22 View FIGURES 18 – 21 View FIGURES 22 – 25 , 26–30 View FIGURES 26 – 30 )...........................................................................................................................9 2. Forewing with recurrent veins received in separate cells ( Figs. 41 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 45 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ) ................... Raphiglossa Saunders Forewing with recurrent veins both received in second submarginal cell ( Figs. 42–44 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 46–47 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ) ................3 3. Midtibia with two spurs ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ) .................................................................................. Discoelius Latreille - Midtibia with one spur................................................................................................................................ 4 4. Propodeum posterolaterally toothed ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 67 – 68 ) .................................................. Cyrtolabulus van der Vecht - Propodeum not toothed posterolaterally ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 67 – 68 ).......................................................................................5 5. TII with translucent apical lamella, clearly separated from disc by preapical thickening ( Figs. 9 View FIGURES 6 – 10 , 24 View FIGURES 22 – 25 ) ........ ......................................................................................................................................... Eumenes Latreille - TII with apical lamella not preceded by thickening ( Figs. 23, 25 View FIGURES 22 – 25 )..............................................................6 6. TI much longer than mesosoma ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22 – 25 ), parallel-sided for apical two thirds ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ) and almost flattened dorsally ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22 – 25 ); pronotum in dorsal view parallel-sided ...................... Ischnogasteroides Magretti - TI not or little longer than mesosoma, apically swollen ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22 – 25 ); pronotum in dorsal view convex anteriorly.............................................................................................................................................................. 7 7. Clypeus apically bluntly angular (female) or flatly convex (male; Fig. 35 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ); tempora in dorsal view as long as eye; male with SVII broadly depressed.......................................................... Katamenes Meade-Waldo - Clypeus apically emarginate ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ); tempora in dorsal view shorter than eye; male with SVII not depressed..................................................................................................................................................... 8 8. Male TVII rounded and SVII with narrow median groove ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 69 – 71 ); TI usually smooth; male antenna with last article about as large as preceding articles................................................................ Delta de Saussure - Male TVII hoodlike ( Fig. 71 View FIGURES 69 – 71 ), SVII basally convex, distally forming lobate process ( Fig. 70 View FIGURES 69 – 71 ); male antenna with last article reduced............................................................................. Alfieria Giordani Soika 9. Forewing with recurrent veins received in separate cells ( Figs. 41 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 45 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ) ..................... Psiliglossa Saunders - Forewing with recurrent veins both received in second submarginal cell ( Figs. 42–44 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 46–47 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ) ..............10 10. Forewing with second submarginal cell petiolate anteriorly ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ) ............................. Alastor Lepeletier - Second submarginal cell not petiolate anteriorly ( Figs. 41–46 View FIGURES 41 – 44 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ) ...............................................................11 11. Tegula evenly rounded posteriorly, not emarginate adjoining parategula and usually not reaching apex of latter ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 56 – 60 ); male antennae apically spiralled ......................................................................................12 - Tegula not evenly rounded posteriorly, emarginate adjoining parategula and usually reaching or surpassing apex of latter ( Figs. 57–63 View FIGURES 56 – 60 View FIGURES 61 – 63 ); male antennae apically hooked or simple ............................................. 19 12. Labial palpi 3-segmented, in female broadly flattened or apically increasing in size, fringed with hairs, forming psammophore ( Figs. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 34 , 37, 39 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ); male mandible with penultimate tooth often not excised.......13 - Labial palpi 4-segmented, female without psammophore ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 31 – 34 ); male mandible with penultimate tooth often deeply and broadly excised .............................................................................................................16 13. Forewing with prestigma longer than pterostigma ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 41 – 44 ); third segment of labial palpi not flattened; body pubescence short; female without cephalic foveae ........................................ Cephalochilus Blüthgen - Forewing with prestigma shorter than pterostigma ( Figs. 41–42 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 45–47 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ); third segment of labial palpi flattened or not; body pubescence long; female with cephalic foveae ...........................................................14 14. Maxillary palpi five-segmented; labial palpi fringed with long setae apically, in female with both apical segments flattened ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 34 ); clypeal apex wide, about as wide as interantennal distance, truncate in female ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 34 ) and scarcely emarginate in male ........................................................... Pterocheilus Klug - Maxillary palpi six-segmented; clypeal apex usually emarginate ............................................................15 15. Labial palpi not fringed with long hairs on apical half of third segment, in female both apical segments cylindrical, third pointed and needle-shaped ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ); male without sternal brushes .................................. ................................................................................................................................. Hemipterochilus Ferton - Labial palpi fringed with long hairs on apical half of third segment, in female third segment wide, flattened ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ); male usually with dense brush of hairs on S III–V .............. Onychopterocheilus Blüthgen 16. Prestigma longer than pterostigma ( Figs. 43–44 View FIGURES 41 – 44 ); scutum with anterior smooth area .................................. ............................................................................................................................. Paravespa Radoszkowski - Prestigma shorter than pterostigma ( Figs. 41–42 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 45–47 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ); scutum without anterior smooth area … 17
17. Pronotum with sharply projecting anteroventral angle ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ); parapsidal furrows distinct; mesepisternum with epicnemial carina; humeri often toothlike ........................................ Paragymnomerus Blüthgen - Pronotum without sharply projecting anteroventral angle ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ); parapsidal furrows absent ..............18 18. Preoccipital carina present dorsally; female: cephalic foveae closely spaced, nearer occipital margin than posterior ocelli ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ); clypeus deeply emarginate; mandible with penultimate tooth deeply excised; male: midlegs normal .............................................................................................. Gymnomerus Blüthgen - Preoccipital carina absent dorsally; female: cephalic foveae well separated, located midway between posterior ocelli and occipital margin ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ); clypeus truncate or weakly emarginate; mandible without excisions; male: midcoxae lobed, or midfemur ventrally with two excisions............... Odynerus Latreille 19. TI with transverse carina ( Figs. 19–21 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ).....................................................................................................20 - TI without carina ( Figs. 22 View FIGURES 22 – 25 , 26–30 View FIGURES 26 – 30 ) .......................................................................................................... 24 20 TI with broad longitudinal median furrow posterior to carina ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ); mesepisternum with epicnemial carina; male antenna simple apically; female cephalic foveae well separated, located midway between posterior ocelli and occipital margin ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ) ........................................................ Symmorphus Wesmael - TI without broad groove ( Figs. 19, 21 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ); mesepisternum without epicnemial carina; male antenna hooked apically; female cephalic foveae closely spaced, nearer occipital margin than posterior ocelli ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 35 – 40 ) 21 21. Submarginal carina not extended posteriorly as pointed process above valvula ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49 – 50 )............................ ................................................................................................................................. Ancistrocerus Wesmael - Submarginal carina extended posteriorly as pointed process above valvula ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49 – 50 )..............................22 22. Pretegular carina present ( Figs. 51, 55 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ); epicnemial carina present or absent............................................... .............................................................................................................. Tachyancistrocerus Giordani Soika - Pretegular carina absent ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 67 – 68 ); epicnemial carina present...................................................................23 23. TI short, much wider than long; carina at about middle of tergum ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ) Eustenancistrocerus Blüthgen - TI about as long as wide or longer; carina at anterior narrow part of tergum, weak ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 21 )...................... ........................................................................................................................... Jucancistrocerus Blüthgen 24. TII with translucent apical lamella, clearly differentiated from disc which is much thicker ( Figs. 26–29 View FIGURES 26 – 30 ). .................................................................................................................................................................. 25 - TII without distinct lamella, sometimes bordered but apex not much thinner than disc ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 26 – 30 )............26 25. TII without apical crenulae or foveae ( Figs. 28–29 View FIGURES 26 – 30 ); propodeum with submarginal carina and vavula not projecting; scutum longer than wide ....................................................................... Microdynerus Thomson - TII with apical row of crenulae or foveae ( Figs. 26–27 View FIGURES 26 – 30 ); propodeum with submarginal carina and vavula differentiated; scutum variable, usually not or little longer than wide .................. Leptochilus de Saussure 26. TI with transparent or translucent apical border ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 26 – 30 ); propodeum sometimes with superior carinae well developed, more or less lamelliform..................................................................................................27 - TI without border; propodeum without superior carinae...........................................................................32 27. Propodeum without carinae or lamellae behind the metanotum (if superior carina present, it does not approach the scutellum).............................................................................................................................28 - Propodeum with carinae or lamellae behind the metanotum ( Figs. 74–75 View FIGURES 72 – 75 ) ..............................................29 28. Metanotum, seen from above, with semicircular ridge between the horizontal and vertical surfaces ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 72 – 75 ) ......................................................................................................................... Antodynerus de Saussure - Metanotum, seen from above, with straight ridge between the horizontal and vertical surfaces, not arched ( Figs. 68 View FIGURES 67 – 68 , 72 View FIGURES 72 – 75 ).......................................................................................................... Euodynerus Dalla Torre [part: subgenus Euodynerus ]
29. Parategula small, partly concealed by tegula; tegula narrow and apically bent inwards ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 56 – 60 )................ .............................................................................................................................. Knemodynerus Blüthgen
- Parategula large, not concealed by tegula; tegula shape different, apically not bent inwards ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 56 – 60 )....30
30. Pronotum without lamellate dorsal carina ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 81 – 87 ); epicnemial carina scarcely recognizable in general sculpture; metasoma dorsally covered with a short, recumbent bristles; male with midfemur flattened on 2/3 of the length and hindtibia distally swollen.................................................... Chlorodynerus Blüthgen
- Pronotum with lamellate dorsal carina clearly developed ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2 – 5 ); metasoma dorsally with little pubescence, only visible apically; male with midfemur not flattened and hindtibia not apically swollen.........31
31. Metanotum not cristate; propodeum with superior carinae elevated near metanotum ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 72 – 75 ), more closely spaced than width of metanotum ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 75 ) ................................................ Syneuodynerus Blüthgen
- Metanotum transverse, cristate along declivity ( Figs. 68 View FIGURES 67 – 68 , 72 View FIGURES 72 – 75 ); propodeum with superior carinae not approaching metanotum so closely ........................................................................ Euodynerus Dalla Torre [part: subgenus Pareuodynerus Blüthgen]
32. Pretegular carina absent ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 67 – 68 )................................................................... Parodontodynerus Blüthgen
- Pretegular carina present ( Figs. 51, 55 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ) .................................................................................................... 33
33. Scutum posteriorly and scutellum impunctate.............................................................. Rhynchium Spinola
- Scutum and scutellum punctate ................................................................................................................34
34. Metanotum bidentate ( Figs. 64–66 View FIGURES 64 – 66 )...........................................................................................................35
- Metanotum not bidentate (in some Pseudepipona slightly bilobed) ( Figs. 72–75 View FIGURES 72 – 75 )...................................37
35. Metanotum laterally with short spines ( Fig. 66 View FIGURES 64 – 66 ), flat in between.......................... Antepipona de Saussure
- Metanotum laterally with strong upright teeth ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 64 – 66 ), depressed in between ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 64 – 66 ) ........................36
36. Scutellum bilobed, with deep transverse furrow anteriorly ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 64 – 66 ); propodeum not dentate; TII shallowly depressed .............................................................................................. Cyphodynerus van der Vecht
- Scutellum evenly rounded; propodeum with several teeth laterally ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 64 – 66 ); TII not depressed ................ .................................................................................................................... Pseudodontodynerus Blüthgen
37. Anterior face of pronotum with two small, close set, deeply impressed medial foveae ( Figs. 52, 54 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ); tegula expanded semicircularly laterally ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ); propodeum with submarginal carina produced into pointed lamella apically and valvula enlarged and free posteriorly from submarginal carina ...............................38
- Anterior face of pronotum without two close set, deeply impressed foveae ( Figs. 51, 55 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ); tegula variably shaped ( Figs. 61–63 View FIGURES 61 – 63 ); submarginal carina and valvula usually not produced...........................................39
38. Pronotum with foveae coalesced ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ); TI subsessile, narrower than TII ............................................... ................................................................................................................... Paraleptomenes Giordani Soika
- Pronotum with foveae separated ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 51 – 55 ); TI about as broad as TII ................. Stenodynerus de Saussure
39. Propodeum with transverse ridge dorsally; tegula broadly rounded and expanded laterally, more than two thirds as wide as long ( Figs. 61–62 View FIGURES 61 – 63 ) .........................................................................................................40
- Propodeum without transverse ridge dorsally; tegula narrow ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 61 – 63 ) .................... Allodynerus Blüthgen
40. Tegula with coarse, sieve-like punctation ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 61 – 63 ); male mandible not notched ......................................... .......................................................................................................................... Brachypipona Gusenleitner
- Tegula without coarse, sieve-like punctation ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 61 – 63 ); male mandible usually with a broad notch above the last tooth ........................................................................................................ Pseudepipona de Saussure
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.