Lernaeenicus hemirhamphi
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.14 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7C7EC9C7-D1FC-41E4-958D-993F42A3CA3F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5668574 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7034D713-FFA5-FF9C-499E-FBEE52B1B8E6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lernaeenicus hemirhamphi |
status |
|
A total of 13,756 individuals of Hemiramphus far were examined, of which 1,800 were infested. Prevalence was almost similar at both stations, i.e. Nagapattinam (13.2%) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A) and Parangipettai (12.5%) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C). Higher prevalence was observed during postmonsoon (2011) at Nagapattinam whereas it was lower during premonsoon (2013) at Parangipettai. The overall mean intensity was 1.6 and 1.5 at Nagapattinam ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 B) and Parangipettai ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 D), respectively (Table 1).
Another host, Hemiramphus lutkei , was also examined for L. hemirhamphi ; 1,082 out of 11,532 individuals were infested by the pennellid. The overall percentage of prevalence was 9.9% at Nagapattinam and 9.5% at Parangipettai. Prevalence (18.4%) was high during postmonsoon (2011) at Nagapattinam and low (3.5%) during premonsoon (2013) at Nagapattinam. The overall mean intensity was 1.4 at both stations. Seasonal high mean intensity of 1.8 was noted during postmonsoon (2011) at Nagapattinam and but was lower (1.2) during premonsoon (2012) at Parangipettai.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |