Odontolabis taynguyensis Xin, Zhong & Qi, 2025
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5673.1.5 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D0B3D9F2-B0D6-44EE-8285-64C56EEEDABA |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16982036 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A1DD620-665F-5A06-18FA-FBA6B457F856 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Odontolabis taynguyensis Xin, Zhong & Qi |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Odontolabis taynguyensis Xin, Zhong & Qi , sp. nov.
http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 ; 2 View FIGURE 2 ; 4A–E View FIGURE 4 ; 5A–B, E–F View FIGURE 5 ; 6A–B, E–F View FIGURE 6 ; 7A–D View FIGURE 7 ; 8A–C View FIGURE 8 ; 9A View FIGURE 9 ; 10A–F).
Type locality. Vietnam, Dak Nong, Dak Song.
Type material. Holotype: telodont male ( NACRC: IOZ (E) 224772): VIETNAM, Dak Nong, Dak Song , alt. 800 m, VI.2024, local collector leg . Paratypes ( 16 males, 7 females): 1 mesodont male ( CCZB): VIETNAM, Lam Dong, Da Lat, alt. 1000–1200 m, VI.2019, Van Ngoc Dang leg. ; 1 telodont male ( CFYX), 1 telodont male ( CXTZ): same data as holotype .; 2 females ( CCZB), 1 female ( CCZB; IMS: X2 View Materials ), 1 female ( CZHQ): VIETNAM, Lam Dong, Bao Loc , alt. 1000–1200 m, V.2019, Van Ngoc Dang leg. ; 1 female ( CCZB): VIETNAM, Lam Dong, Bao Loc , VI.2023, alt. 1000–1200 m, Van Ngoc Dang leg. ; 1 telodont male, 1 female ( CCZB): VIETNAM, Lam Dong, Bao Lam , VIII.2018, alt. 1000–1200 m, Van Ngoc Dang leg. ; 1 female ( CCZB): VIETNAM, Lam Dong, Bao Lam, Dambri , alt. 1000–1200 m, VIII.2018, Van Ngoc Dang leg. ; 1 telodont male, 1 mesodont male, 1 amphiodont male ( CCZB): VIETNAM, Lam Dong, Bao Lam, Dambri , alt. 1000–1200 m, VIII.2018, Van Ngoc Dang leg. ; 1 priodont male ( CCZB): VIETNAM, Lam Dong, Bao Lam, Dambri , alt. 1000–1200 m, IV.2023, Van Ngoc Dang leg. ; 2 mesodont males ( CCZB): VIETNAM, Kon Tum, Dak Long , alt. 1000–1200 m, VI.2023, Van Ngoc Dang leg. ; 1 telodont male ( CFYX): VIETNAM, Dak Lak, alt. 1000–1200 m, V.2018, local collector leg .; 1 mesodont male ( CCZB): VIETNAM, Dak Lak, alt. 1000–1200 m, IV.2018, local collector leg .; 1 amphiodont male ( CZHQ): VIETNAM, Lam Dong, Bao Lam, Dambri , alt. 1000–1200 m, VIII.2019, Van Ngoc Dang leg ; 2 telodont males, 1 mesodont male ( CXTZ): VIETNAM, Kon Tum, alt. 800–1200 m, VI.2025, local collector leg .
Differential diagnosis. The new species is closely to Odontolabis platynota ( Hope, 1845) morphologically, but the following characters will help to recognize. Male: (1) the new species exhibits a larger body size within the same male mandibular morphotypes ( Figs. 1–3 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 ); (2) a shallower and wider emargination of the apical margin of the head ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ); (3) mandible more slender, with the tiny or absent basal mandibular protrusion in telodont males of new species ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ); (4) the new species mainly exhibits acutely angled cephalic lateral projections, though a minor subset of individuals demonstrates a blunter morphology ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Female: (1) the larger body size is also being within female ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ); (2) the protibia exhibits a straighter outer margin, with fewer and sparsely distributed spines ( Figs. 6A–D View FIGURE 6 ); (3) the head exhibits more numerous and coarser punctures ( Figs. 6E–H View FIGURE 6 ).
Description of the holotype, telodont male ( Fig. 1A, D View FIGURE 1 ). Body length 42.6 mm. Length of particular body parts: head ( 6.7 mm), mandible ( 12.5 mm), pronotum ( 6.9 mm), elytra ( 18.1 mm); width: head (13.0 mm), pronotum ( 14.9 mm), elytra ( 14.4 mm).
Habitus ( Fig. 1A, D View FIGURE 1 ). Body black, faintly glossy; body without pubescence except for apical and basal margin of pronotum and legs, apex of protibia mesotibia and metatibia with yellow setae.
Head ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ) transverse with dense punctures on both anterolateral sides. Apical margin widely concave on the middle. Both postocular lateral margins noticeably protruding outward. Canthus long and wide, completely surround the eye. Clypeolabrum tiny and subtriangle, visible in dorsal view, produced anteriorly. Mandible about 1.9 times longer than head, inner margin smooth from base to teeth; in lateral view, almost horizontal; in dorsal view, obviously curved, width nearly uniform, with 3 continuous subtriangle inner teeth apically.Antennal club with 3 antennomeres; antennomeres 8–9 subquadrilateral; antennomere 10 semi-elliptic.
Pronotum transverse, 2.2 times wider than long, wider than head, widest between two lateral angles. Anterior margin bisinuate, posterior margin slightly bisinuate. Anterior angles rounded and directed forwards, lateral angles sharp and posterior angles blunt.
Scutellum subtriangular, nearly smooth with sparse punctures, width almost as long as length.
Legs. Protibia with 3–5 conspicuous sharp protuberances (excluding apical fork) along outer margin, apex bifurcate with branches moderately sharp at tip. Mesotibia and metatibia straight and smooth at outer margin with a terminal spine.
Elytra elongate, 1.3 times longer than wide, anterior margin significantly narrower than pronotum.
Abdomen and aedeagus. Abdominal ventrite VIII ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ) with 2 slightly protruding tips on basal margin near middle. Abdominal tergite VIII ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ) nearly semilune, lateral angles absent. Ventral plate of abdominal segment IX ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ) elongate without membranous stripe, basal part extremely narrow, then suddenly became wider, widens gradually to apex and constricted near apex. Aedeagus ( Fig. 8A–C View FIGURE 8 ) in dorsal view about 3.4 times longer than wide. Basal piece elongated, weakly longer than parameres in dorsal view, with a significant and relatively broad pair of sclerotized dorsal plates, and almost as wide as paramere; ventral plate at apical end of basal piece membranous. Paramere relatively narrow, with a small inner curvature at base, apex of paramere curved outward. Penis about 0.7 times length of paramere in ventral view. Flagellum ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ) long, about 2.6 times longer than aedeagus, apex of flagellum simple.
Variation of males (n=16). In general, body length typically follows the order of telodont males> mesodont males> amphiodont males> priodont males (30.0–47.0 mm) ( Figs. 1B, E View FIGURE 1 ; 2 View FIGURE 2 ), while the mandible-to-head length ratio consistently exhibits the same hierarchical pattern (telodont males> mesodont males> amphiodont males> priodont males) ( Figs. 4A–E View FIGURE 4 ); conversely, the depth of the cephalic apical emargination displays an inverse sequence, with telodont males <mesodont males <amphiodont males <priodont males ( Figs. 4A–E View FIGURE 4 ). In addition, the mandible of larger telodont males less pronounced mandibular curvature apically ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ). A few telodont males exhibit a tiny basal mandibular protrusion ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Mandible of mesodont males straighter, with a large basal mandibular protrusion, apical teeth longer ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Mandible of amphiodont males with almost continuous teeth at inner margin or smooth part shorter ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ). Basal mandibular protrusion of priodont males weakened into teeth, show a row of continuous teeth at inner margin ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ).
Female paratypes (n=7). Body length 25.6–30.1 mm.
Habitus ( Figs. 5A–B, E–F View FIGURE 5 ). Body black, faintly glossy and smooth; body without pubescence.
Head ( Figs. 6E–F View FIGURE 6 ) covered with punctures near eye. Canthus triangular, with blunt lateral angle. Clypeolabrum tiny, transverse. Mandibles asymmetric, about 0.7 times length of head, with hackly inner margin. Antennal club with 3 antennomeres; antennomeres 8–9 subquadrilateral; antennomere 10 semi-elliptic.
Pronotum transverse, 2.2 times wider than long, widest across lateral angles; anterior margin bisinuate, posterior margin slightly bisinuate; anterior angles rounded; lateral angles clearly defined; posterior angles sharp.
Scutellum relatively smooth, about 2 times wider than long.
Elytra about 1.2 times as long as wide. Surface relatively smooth, with shallow punctures.
Legs ( Figs. 6A–B View FIGURE 6 ). Protibia with sparse 3 conspicuous sharp protuberances (excluding apical fork) along outer margin, apex bifurcate with branches moderately sharp at tip, extend apically. Mesotibia and metatibia straight and smooth at outer margin with a terminal spine.
Abdomen and genitalia.Abdominal ventrite VIII (Figs. 10A,D) with membranous area at central part;Abdominal tergite VIII (Figs. 10E, H) semicircular, with triangular membranous area at central part basally. Hemisternite (Figs. 10C, F) with slightly curved oblique at lateral margins, apical margin rounded with setae. Spermathecal duct relatively short. Spermatheca appears symmetrically paired, exhibiting a bulbous morphology positioned terminally on the spermathecal duct. Spermathecal gland absent.
Etymology. Species name taynguyensis is derived from “Tây Nguyên” (Vietnamese: Central Highlands), the name of western plateau region in Vietnam.
Distribution. Vietnam ( Dak Nong, Lam Dong, Kon Tum, Dak Lak).
DNA barcode. A partial sequence of the mitochondrial gene of cytochrome oxidase subunit I ( COI) of the holotype was uploaded to GenBank with accession number PV351613, and a female paratype (X2) from Lam Dong: PV849456.
Phylogenetic analysis based on COI fragment. The “TIM2+F+I+G4” models with the lowest BIC scores were selected as the optimal substitution pattern descriptors. Phylogenetic analyses revealed a distinct separation of the new species from Odontolabis platynota ( Hope, 1845) , with strong nodal support in the ML tree ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ). Genetic divergence analyses ( Table 1) within the genus Odontolabis demonstrated clear hierarchical structuring. Intraspecific genetic distances (K2P model) ranged from 0.00149 to 0.03120, while interspecific divergence across the genus averaged 0.14. Crucially, the genetic distance between the newly proposed species and O. platynota spanned 0.06601 –0.07779. This value far exceeds the upper limit of intraspecific variation (0.03120) and approaches half of the genus-wide interspecific average (0.14), demonstrating a clear-cut species-level divergence. Combined with morphological distinctiveness and phylogenetic separation, these data unequivocally validate the new species as an independent taxonomic entity.
| IMS |
Institute of Marine Sciences |
| COI |
University of Coimbra Botany Department |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
