Ephydrolithus hamadae, Girón & Short, 2019
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.855.33013 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F5A7AE8B-3883-4CFD-859F-B2F3F9A079C0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3129CD1D-7BAE-4C2B-86B4-25B08D27E712 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:3129CD1D-7BAE-4C2B-86B4-25B08D27E712 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ephydrolithus hamadae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ephydrolithus hamadae sp. nov. Figs 5 A–D View Figure 5 , 7 A–D View Figure 7 , 8 View Figure 8 , 9C View Figure 9
Type material.
Holotype (♂): "BRAZIL: Minas Gerais: Lassance; 17.83384S, 44.50515W; 568 m; Cachoeira da Palmeira; flotation of root mats and moss from side of waterfall & seepage; 2.iii.2018; leg. Benetti & team; BR18-0302-04A" (INPA). Paratypes (7): BRAZIL: Minas Gerais: Same data as holotype (INPA, SEMC, 7 including DNA voucher SLE 1506).
Differential diagnosis.
Ephydrolithus hamadae is very similar to E. teli . Both species can only be distinguished from each other by characteristics of the aedeagus.
Description.
Body length 2.6-3.2 mm, width 1.5-1.7 mm. Body elongate oval, moderately convex (Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ). General coloration yellowish to dark brown, slightly paler along margins of pronotum and elytra. Posterior elevation of mesoventrite with well-defined, curved transverse ridge. Elytra without striae or serial punctures. Pro- and mesofemora covered with hydrofuge pubescence along basal 2/3; metafemora with hydrofuge pubescence on tibial grooves. Apex of fifth abdominal ventrite truncate (Fig. 7C View Figure 7 ). Aedeagus (Fig. 7D View Figure 7 ) with basal piece 0.6 × the length of parameres; parameres nearly 0.5 × greatest width of median lobe, with outer margins slightly sinuate; apex of parameres rounded, obliquely directed; apex of median lobe “pinched”, narrowly rounded.
Etymology.
Named after Neusa Hamada from the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus (INPA), in recognition of her support on recent expeditions collecting aquatic beetles in Brazil.
Distribution.
Known only from the type locality (Fig. 8 View Figure 8 ).
Remarks.
This species was collected by gathering moss and roots from bottom and margin of a seepage that was next to a large waterfall (Fig. 9C View Figure 9 ). Specimens were collected by placing the moss and roots in a pan with water, where they floated to the surface along with one specimen of E. spiculatus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |