Egle ciliata (Walker, 1849)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89C63841-3CF4-491D-8C73-BEF7DCB18FB5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5117130 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/686387A0-FFE7-FF80-5889-F9D7FB806180 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Egle ciliata (Walker, 1849) |
status |
|
Corthophila palpella Rondani, 1871 View in CoL
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: 1871a: 328.
TYPE LOCALITY: “ In Alpibus [Alps]”.
TYPE MATERIAL: not found in this study.
CURRENT STATUS: junior synonym of Egle ciliata (Walker, 1849) View in CoL ( Dely-Draskovits 1993: 51, Gorodkov et al. 1995: 6).
REMARKS: Rondani (1871a: 328) described both sexes of Corthophila palpella , from an unspecified number of specimens received from L. Bellardi. Rondani (1877c: 219) considered Chorthophila palpella Rndn. (var.) as a synonym of Chortophila muscaria ( Meigen, 1826) . We were unable to locate any type material of this nominal species in our study. Hennig (1967a: 142) did not report any type for C. palpella in the MZUF and, in fact, there is the cardboard label “ Chorthophila Mcq. palpella Rnd. ♂, Pedem. [= Piedmont]” in the MZUF (Box 23) without any specimens or even pinholes to prove that they were ever there. There is, however, a male (nontype) numbered “1231” under the name “ Chorthophila muscaria Mgn ”, labeled “Parma”, which is not the type locality. Rondani described this nominal species under the generic name “ Corthophila ”, which is an “incorrect subsequent spelling of Chortophila Macquart, 1835 ” ( O’Hara et al. 2011: 65).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Egle ciliata (Walker, 1849)
Sforzi, Alessandra & Sommaggio, Daniele 2021 |
Corthophila palpella
Rondani 1871 |