Chrysops impar Rondani, 1875
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89C63841-3CF4-491D-8C73-BEF7DCB18FB5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5117269 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/686387A0-FEDA-FEBC-5889-FA0FFD0A66A4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chrysops impar Rondani, 1875 |
status |
|
Chrysops impar Rondani, 1875 View in CoL
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: 1875c: 460.
TYPE LOCALITY: “ Insula Bonae Fortunae (Borneo) , Provincia Sarawak [ Bona Fortuna Island , Sarawak Province, Borneo]” ( Rondani 1875c: 421) .
TYPE MATERIAL: 1 ♀, syntype ( MSNG): Sarawak / Typus / impar Rond. / Chrysops impar , n° 73; 1 ♀, syntype (head, thorax and abdomen mostly eaten by dermestids) ( MZUF: Box 71): Chrysops impar n. / Sarawak / [no identification number]; 1 ♀, syntype (head, thorax and abdomen mostly eaten by dermestids) ( MZUF: Box 71): Chrysops impar n. / Borneo, Sarawak, 1865–66, Coll. Doria / [no identification number].
CURRENT STATUS: junior synonym of Chrysops dispar (Fabricius, 1798) ( Stone 1975: 45) View in CoL .
REMARKS: Rondani (1875c: 460) described Chrysops impar from just the female sex, without specifying the exact number of specimens and not giving a range of lengths, from material collected by G. Doria and O. Beccari. Rondani did not select a holotype in his original description. Guiglia (1957: 194) reported “ ♀ Tipo e due cotipi [Type and two cotypes]” in the MSNG. Raineri & Rey (1996: 55) also considered the MSNG specimens as “Typus ♀, 2 Cotypi [Type ♀, 2 Cotypes]”. Guiglia (1957: 194) and Raineri & Rey (1996: 55) did not unambiguously indicate the type, therefore they did not designate a lectotype (I.C.Z.N. 1999: Article 74.5). Guiglia and Raineri & Rey incorrectly reported the two cotypes in the MSNG instead of in the MZUF. The MSNG female and the two MZUF females are all syntypes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |