Cymbella yerlii C.N.Solak, S.Blanco & N.Balkis-Ozdelice, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.484.2.4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6492968 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/68318782-FFAB-FFA4-2DD1-BA3CFD867286 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Cymbella yerlii C.N.Solak, S.Blanco & N.Balkis-Ozdelice |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cymbella yerlii C.N.Solak, S.Blanco & N.Balkis-Ozdelice , sp. nov. ( Figs 16–35 View FIGURE 16–25 View FIGURE 26–31 View FIGURE 32–35 )
Description: Valves slightly to moderately dorsiventral, lanceolate, dorsal margin distinctly convex, ventral margin slightly tumid. Ends indistinctly protracted and rounded ( Table 2). Length 31.8–45.8 μm, breadth 7.4–9.0 μm, maximal length/breadth ratio of the normal cells 5.3. Axial area narrow, linear, central area absent. Raphe slightly ventrally displaced, lateral, becoming filiform near the distal and filiform to weakly reverse-lateral near the proximal ends [type “ e ” according to Krammer (2002: Fig. 67: 3)]. Striae parallel at the central area, becoming slightly radiate near the ends, finely punctate. A distinct isolated 1–2 stigmata are visible just at the end of the central stria on the ventral side. In the SEM, 1–2 slit-like stigma foramina. Parallel arranged pore field alveoli only on the valve end. The margins of the stigma alveoli are provided with teeth-like structures. Striae in the middle portion (dorsal and ventral) 9–10/10 μm, rising to 13–15/10 μm towards the ends, puncta 24–28/10 μm.
Type:— TURKEY, Sakarbaşı, Eskişehir ( GPS 39°21’10.04’’N, 31°03’33.24’’E), 872 m a.s.l., collector: Cüneyt Nadir Solak 24.11.2019. Holotype: slide number 27354 (holotype designated here on Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ) in the collection of Andrzej Witkowski at the University of Szczecin. GoogleMaps
Isotype:— Slide no. TR_ ESK _Sakarbası_ Nov2019 _EPF deposited at Kütahya Dumlupınar University ( Turkey) .
Etymology:— The species was dedicated to Prof. Dr. Sedat YERLİ who is a hydrobiologist in Turkey.
Differential diagnosis:— Cymbella parva (W. Smith) Kirchner in Cohn (1878: 188), C. perparva Krammer (2002: 37) and C. parviformis Krammer (2002: 38) and Cymbella tridentina H.Lange-Bertalot, M.Cantonati & A.Scalfi in Cantonati et al. (2010: 778) are similar taxa. Among them, C. parva is the most similar taxon in all related ones with similar outline. However, length/width ratio is higher in C. yerlii than the other taxa. In C. parviformis , striae density in dorsal and ventral sides are lower than C. yerlii . Regarding to the apices, the shape is non protracted and narrowly rounded in C. parva and C. parviformis while, indistindtly protracted and rounded in C. yerlii and C. parviformis .
Distribution:— Observed only in the type locality.
Ecology:— The water temperature ranged from 21.4–22.9 oC, pH was 7.8–7.9, dissolved oxygen (DO) was 5.2– 6.1 mg /L and electrolytic conductivity was 545–575 µS/ cm-1.
Associated diatom flora:— Cymbella cymbiformis (21.2%), Encyonopsis minuta Krammer & E.Reichardt in Krammer (1997: 95) (10.5%), Amphora pediculus (Kützing) Grunow [described as Cymbella pediculus Kützing (1844: 80) ] (5.3%), Navicula cryptotenella Lange-Bertalot in Krammer & Lange-Bertalot (1985: 62) (4.1%), Eunotia arcubus Nörpel & Lange-Bertalot in Lange-Bertalot (1993: 24) (3.8%), Nitzschia gracilis Hantzsch (1860: 40) (2.9%), Staurosira construens Ehrenberg (1843: 424) (2.5%), Pseudostaurosira brevistriata (Grunow) D.M. Williams & Round (1988: 276) (2.2%), Staurosirella pinnata (Ehrenberg) D.M. Williams & Round (1988: 274) (1.9%), unidentified species of Brachysira Kützing , Cocconeis Ehrenberg , Pseudostaurosira D.M.Williams & Round and Sellaphora Kützing were the most frequent taxa in the sample.
ESK |
Seker Enstitüsü |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |