Remenus Ricker, 1952
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4757871 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AAEA5971-4C18-45C2-AA83-5DD3D622315D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4765454 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/671B126B-FFE2-FFE6-FC7E-FADCAD069C77 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Remenus Ricker, 1952 |
status |
|
Genus Remenus Ricker, 1952 View in CoL
( Figs. 1 View Fig , 3–18 View Figs View Figs View Figs View Figs )
Type species: Perla bilobata Needham & Claassen (1925: 95)
Isogenus (Remenus View in CoL ) Ricker (1952: 122)
Remenus: Illies (1966: 376) View in CoL
Remenus: Hitchcock (1974: 214) View in CoL
Remenus: Stewart & Stark (1984: 406) View in CoL
Remenus: Stewart & Stark (1988: 402) View in CoL
Remenus: Kondratieff & Nelson (1995: 596) View in CoL
Remenus: Stewart & Stark (2002: 437) View in CoL
Remenus: Kondratieff (2004: 164) View in CoL
Remenus: Stark (2017: 236) View in CoL
Male. Macropterous; forewing length 9.1–11.0 mm (n = 40). Body length 7.9–10.6 mm (n = 40). General body color yellow-gold with light brown markings Fig. 1 View Fig ). Head as wide as, or wider than pronotum; crossveins ( Fig. 4 View Figs ). Y-arms of mesosternum meeting posterior corners of furcal pits. Femora pale, light brown dorsally. Tibia pale, light brown dorsally. Tarsi light brown. Abdominal sterna pale to yellowgold; lobe on 7 th sternum well developed, lightly pigmented, narrowly rounded, apex rounded ( Fig. 5 View Figs ); lobe on 8 th sternum reduced, ~ ⅓ the size of lobe on sternum 7, triangular, lightly pigmented, apex acutely rounded ( Fig. 5 View Figs ). Abdominal terga usually yellow-gold, with variable color pattern, covered in regularly spaced with setae; terga 8 and 9 with variable patches of sensilla basiconica ( Fig. 6 View Figs ). Hemitergal lobes variously produced with long trichoid sensilla and various densities of sensilla basiconica ( Fig. 6 View Figs ). Cerci pale, setose ( Figs. 5–6 View Figs ). Lateral stylets absent. Epiproct variable, small, mostly membranous; with or without a mediodorsal sclerite ( Fig. 7 View Figs ). Membranous portion covered in dense, minute hair-like spinulae. Paragenital plates flap-like, triangular or rounded ( Figs. 6–7 View Figs View Figs ). Basal cowl clothed in dense variably pigmented spinulae ( Fig. 7 View Figs ). Aedeagus entirely membranous with two lateral and two posterodorsal lobes ( Figs. 5–7 View Figs View Figs ).
Female. Macropterous; forewing length 9.4–12.0 mm (n = 40). Body length 8.8–12.6 mm (n = 40). General body coloration similar to male. Abdominal terga and sterna generally uniformly pale yellow. Subgenital plate broadly rounded or broadly triangular, produced over ½ sternum 9, or beyond ( Fig. 8 View Figs ); with regularly spaced setae; a variable glabrous basolateral crease is present at the base of the subgenital plate and extends anteriorly up to ⅓ into tergum 8 ( Fig. 8 View Figs ).
Ovum. Length 434–460 μm; width 324–361 μm (n = 12). Turtle-shaped with a ventrally positioned collar ( Fig. 9 View Figs ). Mature ovum with a membranous covering, adorned with regularly spaced globules in clusters of 2–5 ( Fig. 9 View Figs ). Dorsum of chorion smooth with very faint diamond-shaped follicle cell impressions. Dorsal keel extending from collar center to ovum center ( Fig. 9 View Figs ). Collar with prominent diamondshaped follicle cell impressions dorsally and ventrally ( Figs. 9–10 View Figs ). Ovum margin with a thickened raised edge. Micropyles positioned ventrally; arranged in a latitudinal row of 6 near the collar ⅓ ( Fig. 10 View Figs ).
Larva. Body length 8.3–11.4 mm, (n = 19). Preserved specimen yellow-brown. Head wider than pronotum ( Fig. 11 View Figs ); dorsum of head yellow- brown; frons with a faint, thin, pale M-shaped mark ( Fig. 11 View Figs ); pale enclosed oval spots anterolateral of lateral ocelli, anterior of epicranial suture ( Fig 11 View Figs ); large enclosed oval spots posterolateral of lateral ocelli, posterior of epicranial suture (Fig, 11); 2–4 postocular setae ( Fig. 11 View Figs ); frontoclypeus unpigmented; labrum anterior margin with a setal fringe ( Fig. 11 View Figs ); medial lobe of labrum with a dense fringe of golden setae. Lacinia unidentate ( Fig. 12 View Figs ); lacinia sickle-shaped, tapering evenly from apical tooth and bearing stout, rounded, basal knob ( Fig. 12 View Figs ); apical tooth with ~ 12 minute irregularly spaced setae extending halfway up the lacinia from the inner basal surface across the dorsal surface to the distal margin ( Fig. 12 View Figs ). Basal knob with 5–6 submarginal minute setae ( Fig. 12 View Figs ). Mandible with 5 teeth and without a deep cleft between the apical and subapical teeth ( Fig. 13 View Figs ). Middle three teeth with proximal margins lightly serrated; dorsum of mandibles with a dense patch of stout setae ( Fig. 13 View Figs ); proximal margin with a dense brush of stout setae on apical ⅓ ( Fig. 13 View Figs ). Maxillary palp slightly longer than lacinia ( Fig. 14 View Figs ). Submental gills absent ( Fig. 14 View Figs ). Pronotum yellow-brown; 10–16 long erect marginal setae on each side; lateral margins of pronotum brown ( Fig. 11 View Figs ). Meso- and metanota yellow-brown; with 0–1 seta on either side of midline; 1–6 anterolateral setae ( Fig. 15 View Figs ); wing pads with 1–7 marginal setae on proximal margin ( Fig. 15 View Figs ). Y-arms of mesosternum reach the posterior corners of furcal pits. Femora pale yellow-brown with long stout setae over surface and without a dorsal fringe of silky setae. Tibia with short stout submarginal setae on dorsal and ventral surfaces and a dorsal fringe of silky setae. Tarsi with a short dorsal fringe of silky setae. Abdominal terga yellow-brown, with a posterior fringe of variable length setae ( Fig. 16 View Figs ); longest setae ~ ⅔ length of tergum; terga 1–2 without intercalary setae ( Fig. 16 View Figs ); terga 4-10 with <35 intercalary setae ( Fig. 16 View Figs ). Abdominal sterna pale yellow-brown; sterna 1–2 without a posterior fringe or intercalary setae; sternum 3 occasionally with a single posterior seta laterally; sterna 4–8 with <35 intercalary setae and a posterior fringe of variable length setae that is interrupted medially ( Fig. 17 View Figs ); highest concentration of intercalary setae on abdominal segments 7–9 ( Figs. 16–17 View Figs ); female 8 th sternum with a thin darkened strip posteromedially ( Fig. 17 View Figs ); posterior fringe complete on sterna 9–10 ( Fig. 17 View Figs ). Mature male larvae with an elongate terminal process (developing epiproct) with a constriction at the basal ⅓, apical ⅔ thin and tapered ( Fig. 18 View Figs ). Mature larvae with paired medial and lateral spots on the abdominal terga. Cerci with whorls of short or long setae, or a combination of both ( Figs. 16, 18 View Figs ).
Diagnosis. Regionally, Remenus is morphologically most similar to Diploperla duplicata (Banks, 1920) . The two are often sympatric and share the following characters: (1) male tenth tergum partially cleft; (2) lobe on 7 th sternum well developed, narrowly rounded, and lobe on 8 th sternum reduced, ~ ⅓ the size of lobe on 7 th sternum; (3) female subgenital plate broadly rounded with a membranous basolateral crease; (4) interocellular area enclosed with medium brown pigment that generally narrows towards the anterior ocellus and extends laterally from anterior ocellus to center of lateral ocelli; (5) larvae and adults lack submental gills; (6) larvae are similarly concolorous; (7) larvae have a dorsal fringe of setae on the tibia and lack a fringe on the femora; and (8) ova are turtle shaped.
Adult males of Remenus are distinguished from D. duplicata by the presence of a well-developed epiproct and the lack of lateral stylets. Adult females of Remenus differ by the presence of distinct mesosternal Y-arms and <3 cross veins in the apical costal space. Whereas D. duplicata has> 5 cross veins in the apical costal space. Larvae of Remenus are easily distinguished from D. duplicata by their unidentate lacinia and well-developed mesosternal Y-arms. Ova of Remenus are also easily separated by their relatively smooth chorionic surface and the diamond-shaped follicle cell impression on the collar.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Remenus Ricker, 1952
Verdone, Chris J. & Kondratieff, Boris C. 2018 |
Remenus: Stark (2017: 236)
Stark, B. P. 2017: ) |
Remenus:
Kondratieff, B. C. 2004: ) |
Remenus:
Stewart, K. W. & B. P. Stark 2002: ) |
Remenus:
Kondratieff, B. C. & C. H. Nelson 1995: ) |
Remenus: Stewart & Stark (1988: 402)
Stewart, K. W. & B. P. Stark 1988: ) |
Remenus:
Stewart, K. W. & B. P. Stark 1984: ) |
Remenus:
Hitchcock, S. W. 1974: ) |
Remenus:
Illies, J. 1966: ) |
Isogenus (Remenus
Ricker, W. E. 1952: 122 |