Pylochelidae (Forest, 1987)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24199/j.mmv.2003.60.16 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6367985A-FFC1-FFC6-3FC6-7355FA04FE16 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pylochelidae |
status |
|
Key to genera of Pylochelidae View in CoL
1. Shield incompletely separated from posterior carapace, linea transversalis not apparent medially ( Figs 3c, e View Figure 3 ); telson divided into anterior and posterior articulating plates ( Fig. 5a View Figure 5 )............................... 2
— Shield completely separated from posterior carapace, linea transversalis clearly apparent medially ( Figs 3d, f–h View Figure 3 ); telson not divided into anterior and posterior articulating plates ( Fig. 5b View Figure 5 )............................... 3
2. Shield approximately as long as broad; anterior margin with median concavity and rarely rostral spinule ( Fig. 3c View Figure 3 ); corneas always hemispherical..................................... Pylocheles A. Milne-Edwards, 1880 View in CoL
— Shield distinctly broader than long; anterior margin with rounded rostral lobe ( Fig. 3e View Figure 3 ) or with short rostral spine; corneas reduced or absent ( Fig. 3e View Figure 3 ).......................................... Cheiroplatea Bate, 1888 View in CoL
3. Penultimate segments of ocular peduncles without ocular acicles developing squamiform or spiniform anterior projections ( Figs 3f, h View Figure 3 )......................... 4
— Penultimate segments of ocular peduncles with ocular acicles each developing triangular or squamiform anterior projection ( Figs 3d, i, j, m View Figure 3 )..................... 6
4. Penultimate segments of ocular peduncles each with well developed, rounded or subrectangular plate ( Fig. 3f View Figure 3 ); telson with pair of oblique lateral incisions, terminal margin with prominent median cleft; maxilliped 2 without epipod.................. Pomatocheles Miers, 1879 View in CoL
— Penultimate segments of ocular peduncles each with reduced, narrow, calcified plate ( Fig. 3g, h View Figure 3 ); telson with or without pair of oblique lateral incisions, but never prominent, terminal margin with or without median cleft; maxilliped 2 with epipod ( Fig. 4o).....................5
5. Shield as long as broad; rostral spine short, without accessory ventral spine; ultimate segments of ocular peduncles spinose, conical and tapered ( Fig. 3g View Figure 3 ); telson rectangular, longer than broad, with pair of faint, oblique, lateral grooves, terminal margin with slight median notch........................... Parapylocheles Alcock, 1901 View in CoL
— Shield broader than long; rostrum very prominent, with accessory ventral subdistal spine; ultimate segments of ocular peduncles unarmed, basally swollen ( Fig. 3h View Figure 3 ); telson subquadrate, slightly broader than long, without pair of faint, oblique, lateral grooves, terminal margin entire......................... Cancellocheles Forest, 1987 View in CoL
6. Abdominal somites, pleopods 3–5, and uropods symmetrical; telson subrectangular, longer than broad, usually with transverse line of flexion delimiting rounded posterior lobes ( Fig. 5b View Figure 5 ); maxilliped 3 without epipod ( Fig. 4q)......................... Trizochele s Forest, 1987
— Abdominal somites, pleopods 3–5, and uropods asymmetrical; telson variable; maxilliped 3 with epipod ( Fig. 4p)............. Mixtopagurus A. Milne-Edwards, 1880 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.