Mesabolivar embapua, Machado, Éwerton O., Brescovit, Antonio D. & Francisco, Rafael C., 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.178315 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6250389 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/626687E1-5B66-A26B-FF5B-FD8DFD4EF8ED |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mesabolivar embapua |
status |
sp. nov. |
Mesabolivar embapua View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs. 19–28 View FIGURES 19 – 28 )
Types. Male holotype from Parque Natural Municipal Nascentes do Ribeirão Garcia (27o01’– 27o06’ S; 49o04’– 49o10’ W; 290–910 m), Blumenau, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 24.X.2004, R.C. Francisco col. with pitfall traps, deposited in IBSP 62442. Paratype: 1 female, same data as holotype, 18.IV.2004 (IBSP 62443).
Etymology. The specific name is a compound noun in apposition, derived from the Tupi Indian words “ embé ” (superior lip) and “ apuá ” (pointed).
Diagnosis. The males can be distinguished from the congeneric species by the presence of a pair of large and long apophyses on the chelicerae ( Figs. 20–22 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ) combined with the procursus shape ( Figs. 23–24 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ), with a dorsal apophysis bent to the retrolateral face ( Figs. 23–24 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ) and two terminal spines. The female can be distinguished by a projected epigynal plate with a pair of long diverging apophyses, combined with a small rounded pocket ( Figs. 26–27 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ).
Description. Male (Holotype): Total length 1.5, carapace width 0.8; leg I: 7.2 (1.8 + 0.3 + 1.9 + 2.6 + 0.6), tibia II: 1.1, tibia III: 1.0, tibia IV: 1.9, tibia I L/d: 24. Habitus as in fig. 19. Carapace light brown; sternum light ochre. Distinct thoracic groove. Eight eyes in an ocular area only slightly more elevated than carapace ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ); distance PME–ALE about 83% of PME diameter. Chelicera uniformly light brown, basal segment of chelicera with one large and long apophysis with curved tip, approximately perpendicular to the chelicera ( Figs. 20–22 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ). Palp as in fig. 23. Palpal coxa with a very pointed retrolateral apophysis ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ). Femur proximally with a small rounded retrolateral apophysis ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ). Procursus brown, broad, with a dorsal apophysis bent to the retrolateral face in the distal portion ( Figs. 23–24 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ), without prolateral hairs. Distinct tip of procursus, ending in two terminal spines ( Figs. 23–24 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ). Bulb simple, with a small transparent projection, embolar division of bulb slender and membranous at the end ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ). Legs light brown; without spines, vertical or curved hairs. Tarsus I with approximately 11 pseudosegments. Opisthosoma globular, pale green, with some lateral bluish spots ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ).
Female. (Paratype): Total length 1.7, carapace width 0.8; leg I: 8.1 (2.0 + 0.3 + 2.1 + 2.9 + 0.8), tibia II: 1.1, tibia III: 1.0, tibia IV: 1.8, tibia I L/d: 18. In general appearance very similar to male. Tarsus I with approximately 12 pseudosegments. Epigynum light brown, very elevated, with a pair of ventral prominent divergent projections and with a small oval median pocket, extending internally into a blind wall seen through the translucent integument ( Figs. 26–27 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ). Internal genitalia with two oval pore plates ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 19 – 28 ).
Other material examined. None.
Distribution. Known only from type locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |