Eurycyphon fulvus Watts, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3981.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EF71D83B-17B4-49CA-826E-D3A8E7979750 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6110548 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5C5BE52C-FF9E-BC74-2CB5-FB3A909A0EB1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eurycyphon fulvus Watts, 2011 |
status |
|
( Figs. 41, 42 View FIGURES 41 – 48 )
Material studied. 1♂ paratype: Cement Ck 30/1 [from the publication: Vic. Cement Creek 5 km N Warburton 30/ 1/09 CHS Watts] ( SAMA).
Eurycyphon fulvus is immediately recognized by its bicolourous elytra. The pale part is completely transparent, mesonotum and alae clearly visible through the elytra. The surface punctures are finer and denser than in the unicolourous members of the group, only E. falcatus comes close.
Male. Segments 8 and 9 are shown in figure 46 of Watts (2011), E. barringtoni ( Figs. 43–48 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ) is similar. From the tightly convoluted dark apex of the tegmen projects a curved tooth with minute setae on the convex face, a similar larger hook is present in E. barringtoni (compare Figs. 42, 48 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ). The complex internal structure of the paramere apex remains unknown. In E. barringtoni the trigonium ends in lateral points between which is a minute tongue ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ) while in E. fulvus the tip of trigonium is rounded and bears a large bifid tongue ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ). A similar tongue occurs in E. thunguttii and E. falcatus , see there for distinction.
SAMA |
South Australia Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |