Blattidae Burmeister 1838
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2021.1928317 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5BD878FB-ED32-4CF6-AEF0-9AE17A27DB8D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5B5787A7-FFAF-FFE9-FE62-FB77FB611C01 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Blattidae Burmeister 1838 |
status |
|
Family Blattidae Burmeister 1838 View in CoL
Remarks. Sexual dimorphism, particularly differences in the development of tegmina and wings are common in Archiblattinae ( Wang et al. 2016) and Blattinae ( Bohn 1985) . Except for Eroblatta Shelford, 1910 , all members of Archiblattinae are known to have macropterous males and brachypterous females ( Wang et al. 2016). Meanwhile, five Blattinae genera: Pseudoderopeltis Krauss, 1890 ; Deropeltis Burmeister, 1838 ; Cartoblatta Shelford, 1910 ; Shelfordella Adelung, 1910 , and Blatta L., 1758, exhibit such dimorphism, as well as three species Periplaneta : P. arisanica Shiraki, 1931 , P. formosana Karny, 1915 , P. ceylonica Karny, 1908 ( Asahina 1980) .
With the current debate on the validity of Archiblattinae as a subfamily, and its monophyly ( Wang et al. 2016), and the characters of Bundoksia gen. nov. being intermediate between the two subfamilies, a key to Archiblattinae and sexually dimorphic Blattinae is provided.
Key to Archiblattinae View in CoL and Sexually Dimorphic Blattinae View in CoL genera (modified from Mann, unpublished key, pers. comm.)
(1) Mid and hind femur sparsely armed ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 (f,g)).. ........................................................ 2
- Mid and hind femur strongly armed... ................................................................................... 6
(2) Cerci tapering, apically pointed ( Figures 2 View Figure 2 (h,g))... ............................................................. 3
- Cerci apically rounded.. ................................................................................................................ 5
(3) Pronotum smooth; sides thin, slightly deflexed. Hind tibia dorsoventrally flattened, strongly spined ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 (e)).. ............................... .............................. Bundoksia View in CoL gen. nov.
- Pronotum rugose; sides thickened, not deflexed. Hind tibia cylindrical, sparsely spined.. ................................................................................................................................................. 2
(4) Tibial spines moderately developed; spines on outer aspect triserately arranged... ...................................................................................................................... Eroblatta Shelford, 1910 View in CoL
- Tibial spines sparse, spines on the outer aspect of the tibia biserately arranged.. .. ............................................................................................................... Protagonista Shelford, 1908 View in CoL
(5) Pronotum strongly rugose; hexagonal in males; rounded in females with posterolateral margins acute and spine-like. Anteroventral margin of femur weakly armed. Hind tibial spines relatively elongate.. ....................... ...................... Catara Walker, 1868 View in CoL
- Pronotum slightly rugose, trapezoidal in both sexes. Anteroventral margin of femur unarmed. Hind tibial spine short and stout.. ............. Archiblatta Vollenhoven, 1862 View in CoL
(6) Male: first abdominal tergite specialised. Female: hindwings present or absent... 7
- Male: first abdominal tergite unspecialised. Female: hindwings absent.. ... ... ... ....8
(7) Abdominal tergite 6 and 7 sunken. Female: Tegmina squamiform, hindwings absent.. ............................................ ........................................... Pseudoderopeltis Krauss, 1890 View in CoL
- Abdominal tergite 6 and 7 not sunken. Female: Tegmina quadrate, hindwings reduced.. ..................................................................... Periplaneta Burmeister, 1838 View in CoL (in part)
(8) Posterior margin of fifth abdominal tergite distinctly concave medioposteriorly. Female: Tegmina and hindwings absent.. ............ ........... Deropeltis Burmeister, 1838 View in CoL
- Posterior margin of fifth abdominal tergite not or only slightly concave medioposteriorly. Female: Tegmina present... ........................................................................................ 9
(9) Hind basitarsomere slightly shorter than succeeding tarsomeres combined; apical tarsal spine absent.. ..................................................................... Cartoblatta Shelford, 1910 View in CoL
- Hind basitarsomere distinctly longer than succeeding tarsomeres combined; apical tarsal spine present.. ................................................................................................................... 10
(10) Pulvilli of anterior and median metatarsus elongate. Female: Tegmina quadrate... ................................................................................................................ Shelfordella View in CoL ; Adelung, 1910
- Pulvilli of anterior and median metatarsus short. Female: Tegmina squamiform.. .. .......................................................................................................................... Blatta View in CoL ; Linnaeus, 1758
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.