Geostiba

Gusarov, Vladimir I., 2002, A revision of Nearctic species of the genus Geostiba Thomson, 1858 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae), Zootaxa 81, pp. 1-88 : 75-76

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155701

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277593

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5B50E916-FFD4-396F-4D2D-FA7AFBABFE84

treatment provided by

Plazi (2016-03-31 15:36:54, last updated 2024-11-29 12:27:53)

scientific name

Geostiba
status

 

15. Geostiba View in CoL (s. str.) circellaris ( Gravenhorst, 1806) ( Figs. 21­23 View FIGURES 21 ­ 25 ; Figs. 1­4 View FIGURES 1 ­ 7 in Assing (2001))

Aleochara circellaris Gravenhorst, 1806: 155 .

Geostiba View in CoL (s. str.) circellaris : Benick & Lohse 1974: 112. Geostiba circellaris: Muona 1984: 229 View in CoL .

Geostiba View in CoL (s. str.) circellaris: Assing 2001: 139 View in CoL .

Material. CANADA: Newfoundland: ,, S Newfoundland, Rencontre West [47.61°N 56.69°W] (Lindroth), 16.vi.1949 ( MZHF).

Diagnosis. Geostiba circellaris can be distinguished from other Nearctic species of Geostiba by having large eyes (temple length to eye length ratio 1.6­1.9), pronotal pubescence of type VI, reduced wings, elytra shorter than pronotum (pronotum length to elytron length ratio 1.1), the presence of one medial carina on male abdominal tergum 7 in front of posterior margin, the shape of the aedeagus and spermatheca ( Figs. 1­4 View FIGURES 1 ­ 7 in Assing (2001), Figs. 21­23 View FIGURES 21 ­ 25 ).

In North America there is no native species closely related to G. circellaris . Geostiba circellaris is superficially similar to G. impressula in having pronotal pubescence of type VI but can be distinguished from the latter species by having tergum 7 with one medial carina in males and a different shape of spermatheca in females ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 ­ 7 in Assing (2001), Figs. 316­317 View FIGURES 316 ­ 320 ).

Description. Length 2.3­2.8 mm. Body reddish brown to brownish black, in some specimens pronotum, elytra and abdominal segments 7­8 lighter, antennae reddish brown to dark brown, legs and mouthparts from brownish yellow to brown. Body parallel­sided.

Head as wide as long, surface on disk with fine isodiametric microsculpture, puncturation very fine, distance between punctures equal to 2­4 times their diameter. Temple length to eye length ratio 1.6­1.9. Antennal article 2 longer than article 3, article 4 subquadrate, articles 5­10 transverse, last article longer than 9 and 10 combined.

Pronotum as wide as long, width 0.43­0.53 mm, wider than head (pronotal width to head width ratio 1.2); surface on disk with fine isodiametric microsculpture, and fine puncturation, distance between punctures equal to 1­2 times their diameter; pronotal pubescence of type VI. Elytra measured from humeral angle shorter than pronotum (pronotal length to elytral length ratio 1.1), wider than long (1.4), with fine isodiametric microsculpture and fine asperate puncturation, punctures stronger than on pronotum, distance between punctures equals 1­2 times their diameter.

Abdominal terga with fine transverse microsculpture, with fine puncturation, puncturation becoming finer towards abdomen apex, on terga 3­5 distance between punctures equals 2­4 times their diameter. Tergum 7 with white edge.

In males pronotum with small medial tubercle at posterior margin (some females have very weak tubercle) and medial impression in front, each elytron with a tubercle near scutellum but distant from elytral suture. Male tergum 7 with one short medial carina in front of posterior margin. Male tergum 8 with two weak and short parallel carina in front of middle of convex posterior margin. Male sternum 8 with posterior margin convex, extending posteriorly beyond tergum.

Aedeagus as in Figs. 1­3 View FIGURES 1 ­ 7 in Assing (2001). Internal sac of aedeagus with one pair of large diverticula ( Figs. 21­22 View FIGURES 21 ­ 25 ).

Posterior margin of female tergum 8 convex. Posterior margin of female sternum 8 distinctly convex, without emargination.

Spermatheca as in Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 ­ 7 in Assing (2001).

Distribution. Geostiba circellaris is a widespread Palaearctic species. In the Nearctic region, it is known only from Newfoundland ( Muona 1984), where it was introduced from Europe. Contrary to the opinion expressed by Lohse and Smetana (1988) Geostiba impressula ( Casey, 1906) is not a synonym of G. circellaris (see discussion for G. impressula ). Geostiba circellaris is not known from western North America.

Assing, V. (2001) A revision of the Turkish species of Geostiba Thomson 1858 and Tropimenelytron Pace 1983 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae). Linzer biologische Beitrage, 33 (1), 137 - 185.

Benick, G. & Lohse, G. A. (1974) 14. Tribus: Callicerini (Athetae). In: Freude, H., Harde, K. W. & Lohse, G. A. (Eds.), Die Kafer Mitteleuropas. Band 5, Staphylinidae II (Hypocyphtinae und Aleocharinae). Pselaphidae. Krefeld: Goecke & Evers Verlag, pp. 72 - 220.

Casey, T. L. (1906) Observations on the staphylinid groups Aleocharinae and Xantholinini, chiefly of America. Transactions of the Academy of Science of St. Louis, 16, 125 - 434.

Gravenhorst, J. L. C. (1806) Monographia Coleopterorum Micropterorum. Gottingen: Henricus Dieterich. xvi + 248 pp.

Lohse, G. A. & Smetana, A. (1988) Four new species of Geostiba Thomson from the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina, with a key to North American species and synonymic notes (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 42 (3), 269 - 278.

Muona, J. (1984) Review of Palaearctic Aleocharinae also occurring in North America (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Entomologica scandinavica, 15, 227 - 231.

Gallery Image

FIGURES 21 ­ 25. Partially everted internal sac of aedeagus of Geostiba circellaris (Gravenhorst) (21 ­ 23, St. Petersburg Region, Russia) and G. infirma (Weise) (24 ­ 25, Ivano­Frankovsk Region, Ukraine). 21, 24 – ventral view; 22, 25 – lateral view; 23 – dorsal view. Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURES 1 ­ 7. Mouthparts of Geostiba circellaris (Gravenhorst) (1 ­ 2, Moscow Region, Russia), G. carteriensis Pace (3 ­ 4, Tennessee), G. appalachigena Gusarov, sp. n. (5 ­ 6, paratype from West Virginia) and G. pluvigena Gusarov, sp. n. (7, paratype from North Carolina). 1, 3 – labrum; 2, 4 – epipharynx; 5 – left mandible, dorsal view; 6 – left mandible, ventral view; 7 – right mandible, dorsal view. Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURES 316 ­ 320. Genitalia of Geostiba impressula (Casey) (holotype (316) and specimens from Triangle Lake, Oregon (317 ­ 320 )). 316 ­ 317 – spermatheca; 318 – everted internal sac, ventral view; 319 – everted internal sac, lateral view; 320 – apex of left paramere, side facing median lobe. Scale bar 0.2 mm (316 ­ 317, 320), 0.4 mm (318 ­ 319).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

SubFamily

Aleocharinae

SubGenus

Geostiba