Onitis kethai, Karimbumkara & Priyadarsanan, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.956.2657 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9DCDD521-909D-4436-8495-086A11C50DA0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13742909 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C3F62D8F-89D9-4034-A209-382401D8B861 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C3F62D8F-89D9-4034-A209-382401D8B861 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Onitis kethai |
status |
sp. nov. |
Onitis kethai sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C3F62D8F-89D9-4034-A209-382401D8B861
Figs 7 View Fig , 8A–D View Fig , 9C View Fig , 14C View Fig , 15C View Fig , 16C View Fig 16 , 18 View Fig
Differential diagnosis
Onitiskethai sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from O. philemon in having stronger and more closely placed punctures on the pronotum; genae smoothly rounded in O. kethai , while strongly rounded in O. philemon , both inconspicuously punctured. The clypeus is rugulose in O. kethai ( Fig. 9C View Fig ); while in O. philemon it is granular in male ( Fig. 9D View Fig ) and rugose in female. Onitissinghalensis differs from both these species in having strong rounded granules on clypeus and head while the genae are sparingly granular ( Fig. 9F View Fig ). In O. kethai the space between the clypeal carina, frontal carina and the tubercle behind is strongly rugose, while in O. philemon and O. singhalensis it is granular. Differences were also observed on comparing the aedeagus of O. kethai ( Fig. 8A–D View Fig ), O. philemon ( Fig. 8E–H View Fig ) and O. singhalensis ( Fig. 8I–L View Fig ).
Etymology
Named in memory of our field assistant, the late Mr Ketha Gowda who assisted PDR in many of his field trips and helped in sampling dung beetles and other insects.
Type material examined
Holotype
INDIA • ♂; Karnataka, Biligiri Rangaswamy temple Tiger Reserve, Honnametti shola; 11°54ʹ7.68″ N, 77°11ʹ33.84″ E; open cow dung bait trap; 10 May 1998, Priyadarsanan Dharma Rajan leg.; specimen deposited at NBAIR, NIM/NBAIR/COL/ONIT/H-271023B .
GoogleMapsParatypes (13 specimens) GoogleMaps
INDIA • 8 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Karnataka, Biligiri Rangaswamy temple Tiger Reserve, Honnametti shola; 11°54ʹ7.68″ N, 77°11ʹ33.84″ E; open cow dung bait trap; 10 May 1998; Priyadarsanan Dharma Rajan leg.; AIMB / Co/Sc1000293 to 1000305 .
Description
MEASUREMENTS (in mm). TL=11.5–15; BW =6–7.5; PL=4–6; PW= 6–8; EL=6.5–8; HL=3–3.5; HW=3–4.5.
Male (holotype)
Body, elytra, head, legs, antenna and mouthparts reddish, elytra red with a tinge of metallic green; oval, slightly convex. Head ( Fig. 9C View Fig ) closely granular with some rugosity, hind part almost smooth; clypeus parabolic, rugulose, margin slightly reflexed; with a feeble emargination in the middle, separated from the vertex by an interrupted frontal carina with a short curved clypeal carina and a blunt tubercle behind; genae with scattered imperceptible punctures. Pronotum ( Fig. 14C View Fig ) strongly and closely punctured in the middle, less closely at the sides, more strongly and closely pitted anteriorly, with a very slight median line starting above the basal impression, extending almost up to the anterior margin as thin smooth area; anterior sides of pronotum slightly curved, strongly rounded in the middle, bisinuate behind; front angles sharp, base bluntly angulate in the middle; basal fovea deep near the base with imperceptible punctures in circular rows at the periphery. Elytra strongly striate, striae without punctures, elytral intervals finely and sparsely punctured with the 1 st, 3 rd and the 5 th intervals convex, sutural interval shining while the rest opaque. Pygidium not shining, imperceptibly punctured. Metasternum with deep broad longitudinal groove in the front, metasternal shield imperceptibly punctured, with scattered aciculate punctures at the sides anteriorly; sides of the metasternum granular and thinly covered with long hairs. Protibia slightly curved with four strong external teeth and a sharp process at the tip, profemur not toothed; mesofemur ( Fig. 16C View Fig 16 ) plain and curved near the tibial joint where it forms a sharp tooth-like process on both upper and lower ridges; hind trochanter slightly toothed.
AEDEAGUS (in mm) ( Fig. 8A–D View Fig ). LP= 2.5, Lp=2.2; BP=1.3, BpB=1, BpT=0.5. Phallobase longer than parameres. Parameres slightly sinuate near the base, curved inwards anteriorly and hooked at the tip.
Female
Clypeus closely rugose; protibia with four strong teeth and an articulated spur; no protrusions on the legs.
Habitat
The collections were made in the cloud forests of Honnametti in Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Tiger Reserve, Karnataka, India.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |