Rhaucus Simon, 1879
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4338.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0D53EB9D-2D0B-4438-851B-A98563D16DCC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6004638 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/546E685E-9F09-A617-9493-7DA22417FADF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhaucus Simon, 1879 |
status |
|
Rhaucus Simon, 1879 View in CoL
Rhaucus Simon, 1879: 213 View in CoL ; Pickard-Cambridge, 1905: 572; Roewer, 1912a: 77; 1923: 349; Mello-Leitão, 1923: 113; Mello- Leitão, 1926: 334; Mello-Leitão, 1932: 57; Mello-Leitão, 1933: 106; 110; Mello-Leitão, 1935: 113; Roewer, 1943: 13; Kury, 2003: 83.
Rhaucus (Rhaucus) View in CoL : Sørensen in Henriksen, 1932: 352.
Cynorta View in CoL [part.]: Goodnight & Goodnight, 1953: 37.
Neorhaucus Pickard-Cambridge, 1905: 572 View in CoL ; Roewer, 1912a: 24; Roewer, 1923: 305; Mello-Leitão, 1926: 331; Roewer, 1927: 548; Mello-Leitão, 1932: 89; Mello-Leitão, 1933: 107; Mello-Leitão, 1935: 114; Kury, 2003: 73. New synonymy
Pararhaucus Pickard-Cambridge, 1905: 572 View in CoL ; Roewer, 1912a: 101; Roewer, 1912b: 142; Roewer, 1923: 378; Mello-Leitão, 1926: 335; Roewer, 1928: 551; Mello-Leitão, 1932: 88; Mello-Leitão, 1933: 107; Mello-Leitão, 1935: 114 [junior subjective synonym of Paecilaema C. L. Koch, 1839 View in CoL by Goodnight & Goodnight (1953b: 54)]. New synonymy Megarhaucus Mello-Leitão, 1941: 169 View in CoL ; Kury, 2003: 67. New synonymy
Etymology. From Greek Ῥαῦκος (name of two cities in Crete). Gender masculine.
Type species. Type of Rhaucus Simon, 1879 : Rhaucus vulneratus Simon, 1879 , by subsequent designation of Pickard-Cambridge (1905).Type of Neorhaucus Pickard-Cambridge, 1905 : Neorhaucus aurolineatus Pickard- Cambridge, 1905, by monotypy. Type of Pararhaucus Pickard-Cambridge, 1905 : Pararhaucus obscurus Pickard- Cambridge, 1905, by monotypy. Type of Megarhaucus Mello-Leitão, 1941 : Megarhaucus robustus Mello-Leitão, 1941 , by original designation.
Diagnosis. DS alpha type (in Cynorta , Eulibitia and Flirtea beta type), tegument granular ( Figs 3a View FIGURE 3 , 10a View FIGURE 10 ) (in Eulibitia , Flirtea and Metarhaucus smooth). Mesotergum clearly delimited, divided into four areas by well-marked grooves. Area III with a pair of tubercles varying between acuminate, dome-shaped or mammilliform ( Figs 6c View FIGURE 6 , 12c View FIGURE 12 , 15c View FIGURE 15 ) (in Cynorta and Flirtea acuminate medium/high spines; in Eulibitia , very short tubercles). Pedipalpal tibia wide, spoon shaped ( Figs 4b View FIGURE 4 , 8b View FIGURE 8 ) (in Cynorta , Erginus , Eulibitia and Flirtea elongated, in Roquettea spatulate). Coxae IV with prominent multi-tuberculated clavi inguines ( Figs 4h–i View FIGURE 4 ) (in Cynorta and Flirtea one large apophysis, in Eulibitia two irregular tubercles, in Taito wrinkled granules) and a multicapitate apophysis (mca) of at least seven tubercles ( Fig. 4i View FIGURE 4 ) (in Cynorta three fused tubercles, in Taito two tubercles, in Platymessa two fused tubercles). Legs III–IV curved, robust and very granular, with a pair of ventral rows of spines from Fe to Ti ( Figs 3d–e View FIGURE 3 , 7d–e View FIGURE 7 ) (in Cynorta , Erginus , Eulibitia and Flirtea straight, thin and mostly smooth). Femur IV shorter than DS length (longer in Cynorta , Erginus , Eulibitia and Flirtea ). VP of penis short (in Flirtea very elongated), with two lateral patches of type 4 microsetae not reaching the center of the VP in ventral view ( Figs 5c View FIGURE 5 , 8h View FIGURE 8 ) (in Cynorta covering the entire surface, in Eulibitia covering only lateral margins, in Flirtea smooth). VP of penis with two large MS A ( Figs 5b View FIGURE 5 , 11g View FIGURE 11 , 14i View FIGURE 14 ) (in Cynorta one MS A extremely reduced, in Flirtea one MS A larger).
Included species. Rhaucus vulneratus Simon, 1879 ; Rhaucus quinquelineatus Simon, 1879 comb. rest.; Rhaucus serripes ( Simon, 1879) comb. rest.; Rhaucus robustus ( Mello-Leitão, 1941) comb. nov.; Rhaucus florezi sp. nov.
Geographical distribution and habitat. Kury (2003) correctly stated that Rhaucus inhabits Andean highlands in Colombia, near Bogotá (and not Brazilian Amazon), but also gave an isolated record from Monterredondo (Cauca, 1400 m a.s.l.). This record is probably a mistake and should refer to Monterredondo, a locality in the road from Bogotá to Chingaza National Natural Park ( Fig. 21b View FIGURE 21 ) very close to where R. robustus , R. quinquelineatus , and R. vulneratus have been collected. Ranges of species of Rhaucus show a significant degree of overlap ( Figs 22 View FIGURE 22 , 23 View FIGURE 23 ). They seem to be endemic to the Northern Andes in Colombia, from areas of Santander, Boyacá and Cundinamarca over 2300 m a.s.l. where montane forests and páramos from the Eastern mountain chain are dominant.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Rhaucus Simon, 1879
García, Andrés F. & Kury, Adriano B. 2017 |
Cynorta
Goodnight 1953: 37 |
Rhaucus (Rhaucus)
Henriksen 1932: 352 |
Neorhaucus
Kury 2003: 73 |
Mello-Leitao 1935: 114 |
Mello-Leitao 1933: 107 |
Mello-Leitao 1932: 89 |
Roewer 1927: 548 |
Mello-Leitao 1926: 331 |
Roewer 1923: 305 |
Roewer 1912: 24 |
Pickard-Cambridge 1905: 572 |
Pararhaucus
Kury 2003: 67 |
Goodnight 1953: 54 |
Mello-Leitao 1941: 169 |
Mello-Leitao 1935: 114 |
Mello-Leitao 1933: 107 |
Mello-Leitao 1932: 88 |
Roewer 1928: 551 |
Mello-Leitao 1926: 335 |
Roewer 1923: 378 |
Roewer 1912: 101 |
Roewer 1912: 142 |
Pickard-Cambridge 1905: 572 |
Rhaucus
Kury 2003: 83 |
Roewer 1943: 13 |
Mello-Leitao 1935: 113 |
Mello-Leitao 1933: 106 |
Mello-Leitao 1932: 57 |
Leitao 1926: 334 |
Mello-Leitao 1923: 113 |
Roewer 1912: 77 |
Pickard-Cambridge 1905: 572 |
Simon 1879: 213 |