Actinonema Cobb, 1920
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4578.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CE27CD48-70BB-4979-9C67-A1A2E1BAAFFD |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/52215C67-FFE5-FF97-FF21-FAAD8388FAFC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Actinonema Cobb, 1920 |
status |
|
Genus Actinonema Cobb, 1920
The genus Actinonema was proposed by Cobb (1920) with the description of A. pachydermatum . Wieser (1954) synonymized Pareuchromadora Schuurmans Stekhoven & Adam, 1931 with Actinonema transferring all species ( P. amphidiscatum Schuurmans Stekhoven & Adam, 1931 ; P. fragile sensu Allgén, 1942 ; P. longicaudatum Chitwood, 1951 and P. setifer Schuurmans Stekhoven, 1943 ). Wieser (1954) also transferred Spiliphera fragilis described by Allgén (1929) to Actinonema and synonymized P. amphidiscatum with it. Furthermore, Wieser (1954) transferred Euchromadora longicaudata described by Steiner (1918) to Actinonema and synonymized the recently transferred P. fragile and P. setifer with it. In order to avoid homonymy of P. longicaudatum with E. longicaudata, Wieser (1954) renamed the first to A. chitwoodi but this species should be considered species inquirendum since the description was based only on a poorly described single female. Later A. fragile , mentioned as Spiliphera fragilis , was synonymized with A. pachydermatum by Lorenzen (1972). The species A. fidatum , A. celtica and A. grafi were described by Vitiello (1970), Boucher (1976) and Jensen (1991), respectively. Muthumbi & Vincx (1998b) described A. paraceltica and A. smolae and also discussed differences between Actinonema and the closely related genus Rhips . The authors state that two main characters are considered to distinguish Actinonema and Rhips in the majority of identification works: cuticle with solid cones in Rhips (absence of the same in Actinonema ) and double-jointed spicules in Rhips (simple spicules in Actinonema ). However, Muthumbi & Vincx (1998b) affirm that sometimes is difficult to assign the correct genus because males of Rhips can lose their spicules. Therefore, we agree with them that solution for a correct identification can come only at molecular level and in mixed populations of Actinonema and Rhips the individuals should be treated as one single ecological unit. The last addition to Actinonema was by Shi et al. (2018), who described A. falciforme and also presented an identification key for the species in this genus.
Diagnosis (modified from Muthumbi & Vincx 1986b and Tchesunov 2014): Cuticle heterogenous with lateral differentiation as a ridge beginning at the end of the pharynx. Six outer labial and four cephalic setae arranged in one circle of ten setae. Amphideal fovea conspicuous, transversally oval with a double contour. Buccal cavity with one small dorsal tooth and two ventrosublateral teeth. Posterior pharyngeal bulb may be developed or not. Spicules simple and curved. Gubernaculum with L-shaped pieces.
Number of valid species: 8.
Genus Actinonema Cobb, 1920
Syn. Adeuchromadora Boucher & De Bovée, 1971
Pareuchromadora Schuurmans Stekhoven & Adam, 1931
VALID SPECIES
1. Actinonema celtica Boucher, 1976 (West Channel)
2. Actinonema falciforme Shi, Yu & Xu, 2018 (East China Sea)
3. Actinonema fidatum Vitiello, 1970 (Mediterranean)
4. Actinonema grafi Jensen, 1991 (Norwegian Sea)
5. Actinonema longicaudatum ( Steiner, 1918) Wieser, 1954 (SW Africa)
Syn. Actinonema setifer ( Schuurmans Stekhoven, 1943) Wieser, 1954
Euchromadora longicaudata Steiner, 1918
Pareuchromadora fragilis sensu Allgén, 1942
Pareuchromadora setifer Schuurmans Stekhoven, 1943
6. Actinonema pachydermatum Cobb, 1920 (Florida)
Syn. Actinonema amphidiscatum ( Schuurmans Stekhoven & Adam, 1931) Wieser, 1954
Actinonema fragile (Allgén, 1929) Wieser, 1954
Adeuchromadora megamphida Boucher & De Bovée, 1971
Pareuchromadora amphidiscata Schuurmans Stekhoven & Adam, 1933
Spiliphera fragilis Allgén, 1929
7. Actinonema paraceltica Muthumbi & Vincx, 1998 (Indian Ocean)
8. Actinonema smolae Muthumbi & Vincx, 1998 (Indian Ocean)
SPECIES INQUIRENDUM
1. Actinonema chitwoodi Wieser, 1954 (Texas, USA)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Actinonema Cobb, 1920
Venekey, Virag, Gheller, Paula F., Kandratavicius, Noelia, Cunha, Beatriz Pereira, Vilas-Boas, Ana Carolina, Fonseca, Gustavo & Maria, Tatiana F. 2019 |
Adeuchromadora Boucher & De Bovée, 1971
Boucher & De Bovee 1971 |
Adeuchromadora megamphida Boucher & De Bovée, 1971
Boucher & De Bovee 1971 |
Actinonema fragile (Allgén, 1929)
Wieser 1954 |
Pareuchromadora setifer
Schuurmans Stekhoven 1943 |
Pareuchromadora fragilis sensu Allgén, 1942
Allgen 1942 |
Pareuchromadora amphidiscata
Schuurmans Stekhoven & Adam 1933 |
Pareuchromadora
Schuurmans Stekhoven & Adam 1931 |
Spiliphera fragilis Allgén, 1929
Allgen 1929 |
Actinonema
Cobb 1920 |
Actinonema pachydermatum
Cobb 1920 |
Euchromadora longicaudata
Steiner 1918 |