Phaonia trispila ( Bigot, 1885 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3702.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:717368C3-6909-4DCF-A825-D138B80B10A2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6164770 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5024BB7A-FF80-6D27-FF7C-3D61D5B8F9EC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phaonia trispila ( Bigot, 1885 ) |
status |
|
Phaonia trispila ( Bigot, 1885) View in CoL
( Figs. 29 View FIGURES 28 – 29 , 63 View FIGURES 61 – 65 )
Type material examined. Bigotomyia niger Albuquerque & Medeiros, 1980 . Synonymy with Phaonia trispila by Coelho 2000. Holotype male, pinned, abdomen in plastic vial, “Gramado / Rio Grande do Sul / Brasil ” printed on white paper; “H.S.Lopes [printed] / 15.I.72 [handwritten]” on white paper; “Holotipo” print on red paper, black frame; “ B. niger sp. nov. [handwritten] / K. Medeiros det. [printed]” on white paper; “ Phaonia trispila / ( Bigot, 1885) / S.M.P: Coelho det. 1994” printed on white paper ( MNRJ).
Other material examined. ARGENTINA : BUENOS AIRES: 1 female, Burzaco, I-2006, Mulieri leg. ( MACN); 1 female, Capital Federal, RECS, V-2007, Patitucci leg. ( MACN); 1 female, 1 male, same data, VI-2007, Patitucci leg. ( MACN); 1 female, same data, X-2007, Patitucci leg. ( MACN); 1 female, same data, XI-2007, Patitucci leg. ( MACN); 1 female, same data, I-2008, Patitucci leg. ( MACN); 1 female, Carlos Casares, I-2010, Torretta leg. ( FAUBA); 1 female, same data, I-2008, Fernandéz & Cilla leg. ( FAUBA); 5 females, Ministro Rivadavia, XI-2005, Mulieri leg. ( MACN); 2 males, same data, XII-2005, Mulieri leg. ( MACN). TUCUMÁN: 1 female, Tucumán. ( MLP); 1 female, Sierra San Javier, 6-IV-1929, Box leg. ( MACN).
Distribution in Argentina ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 61 – 65 ): Buenos Aires; Tucumán (new record)
References for Argentina View in CoL . Bigot (1885); Coelho (2000); Malloch (1921); Snyder (1957); Stein (1907).
Remarks. The identification of P. trispila was stablished with the redescription made by Coelho (2000). Information on the immature stages remains unknown.
Biology. There is little information about this species. The adults are considered saprophagous (Rodrígues- Fernández et al. 2006), however, some specimens studied in this work were colleted on flowers.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.