Paramacrobiotus bengalensis, Basu & Babu & Siddique & Purushothaman, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.890.2249 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0DDE9C27-6BB0-411B-BE96-9BC5DC282202 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8284484 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/19ABAA28-D46D-4045-A126-FC628526C114 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:19ABAA28-D46D-4045-A126-FC628526C114 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Paramacrobiotus bengalensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Paramacrobiotus bengalensis sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:19ABAA28-D46D-4045-A126-FC628526C114
Figs 2–7 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig , Tables 3–4 View Table 3 View Table 4
Etymology
The specific toponymic bengalensis refers to the State of West Bengal, India, where the type locality of this new species, ‘Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden’, Shibpur, is situated.
Material examined
32 specimens (one holotype, 28 paratypes, three voucher specimens) and five eggs were mounted on microscopic slides in Hoyer’s medium. Three specimens and two eggs were fixed for SEM preparation. Three specimens were processed for genotyping.
Holotype INDIA • West Bengal, Howrah, Shibpur, Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden ( Fig. 1 View Fig ); 22°33′18.1′′ N, 88°17′30.7′′ E; Rahul Babu and Subhrangshu Basu leg.; moss from a tree (Sample Code: BSI/M 8 ); ZSI-HQ/GNC/T1/1 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes INDIA • 3 specs (slides); same collection data as for holotype; ZSI-HQ/GNC/T2/1 , ZSI-HQ/GNC/ T3/1 , ZSI-HQ/GNC/T4/1 National Zoological Collection, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India GoogleMaps • 24 specs (slides); same collection data as for holotype; ZSI/TAR_IND/WB/001 to ZSI/TAR_IND/ WB/024 National Zoological Collection, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India GoogleMaps • 3 voucher specs; same collection data as for holotype; ZSI/TAR_IND/WB/V001 to ZSI/TAR_IND/WB/V003 GoogleMaps • 5 eggs; same collection data as for holotype; ZSI/TAR_IND/WB/E001 Protozoology Section, Zoological Survey of India HQ, New Alipore, M Block, Kolkata, India GoogleMaps .
Description
The body is almost transparent in juveniles, white in adults, and transparent after mounting in Hoyer’s medium ( Fig. 2 View Fig ; measurements and statistics provided in Table 3 View Table 3 ). Eyes are present in live specimens but dissolve after mounting in Hoyer’s medium.
Mouth anteroventral, bucco-pharyngeal apparatus of the Macrobiotus type ( Fig. 3 View Fig ) with 10 peribuccal lamellae and ventral lamina. The oral cavity armature is well developed and composed of three bands of teeth ( Fig. 3B–C View Fig ). The teeth in the first band are granular in shape and smaller than those in the other two bands. The first band of teeth is situated in the anterior portion of the oral cavity behind the bases of the peribuccal lamellae. The second band, situated between the ring fold and the third band ( Fig. 3B–C View Fig ) is intermediate in size, continuous, and arranged in a row that runs around the oral cavity wall. The second band comprises cone shaped teeth which are parallel to the main axis of the buccal tube. Teeth of the second band are uniform and regular and are not joined to each other. The third band is located at the rear end of the oral cavity between the second band teeth and the buccal tube opening. The third band is divided into two parts: dorsal and ventral, with three ventral and three dorsal teeth each (two lateral and one median, which is always slightly shorter than the lateral ones). The dorsal and ventral portions are visible under the PCM as one median ridge and two lateral transverse ridges. The medioventral tooth of the third band of teeth is subdivided into two to three smaller teeth ( Fig. 3B View Fig ). Additional granular teeth are absent between the second and third band of teeth on the ventral side. The pharyngeal bulb is spherically shaped with triangular apophyses. Three macroplacoids and rod-shaped microplacoids are present and distinctly visible under PCM ( Fig. 3A, D View Fig ). The macroplacoid sequence is 2<1 ≤3, and the first macroplacoid is anteriorly thinner and arrow-shaped. The second macroplacoid is bar-shaped without constriction, whereas the third macroplacoid has a distinct sub-terminal constriction ( Fig. 3D View Fig ).
The claws are Y-shaped and of the hufelandi type. The primary claw branches have distinct accessory points, a common tract, and a stalk that connects the claw and lunula ( Fig. 4A View Fig ). The lunulae under all the claws on all the legs are smooth ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). Leg cuticle is smooth, without any granulations present in legs I–III. Granulation is present on the hind legs but only faintly visible ( Fig. 4D View Fig ). Cuticular bars under the claws absent. In PCM, muscle attachments under claws I to III are visible ( Fig. 4B–C View Fig ).
Eggs laid freely, white/colourless with 12–14 cone-shaped processes on the circumference ( Fig. 5 View Fig ; measurements and statistics provided in Table 4 View Table 4 ). The space between processes is areolated with 8 to 10 areolas present around each process ( Fig. 6 View Fig ). The surface of the areoles is without pores but sculptured with wrinkles. Processes trunk cone shaped with a cap-like structure on the top ( Fig. 7 View Fig ), with fine villilike protrusions. Under PCM egg processes walls have fine reticulation which is caused by the internal labyrinthine layer within the chorion ( Fig. 7A–B View Fig ).
DNA sequences
We obtained sequences for two DNA markers. Out of these two successfully sequenced markers, 18S rRNA was represented by two haplotypes, whereas a single haplotype was found for COI: the 18S rRNA haplotype 1 sequence (GenBank: ON923868), 1017 bp long; the 18S rRNA haplotype 2 sequence (GenBank: ON923866) 1014 bp long; the COI haplotype 1 sequence (GenBank: OP531839), 658 bp long.
Phylogenetic analysis
The phylogenetic reconstruction performed with the BI and ML methods on the concatenated dataset of the two DNA markers showed almost identical topologies, with lower support values for the ML tree ( Fig. 8A View Fig ). Our analysis revealed that the Paramacrobiotus richtersi morphogroup forms a monophyletic clade, whereas the Paramacrobiotus areolatus morphogroup was recovered as a paraphyletic group ( Fig. 8A–B View Fig ), which was consistent with the results presented by Stec et al. (2020c). Phylogenetic analysis supported the discovery of Paramacrobiotus bengalensis sp. nov. The new species is strongly supported in the monophyletic clade of Paramacrobiotus richtersi in both the BI and ML phylogenetic trees, establishing that it does indeed belong to the Paramacrobiotus richtersi morphogroup.
Ecological information
The moss (species unknown) was collected from the mango tree Mangifera indica L., at a height of approximately 2 m from the ground. The altitude of the type locality is 12 m above sea level. The type locality is situated on the banks of River Ganges.
Species delimitation
ASAP and mPTP analyses of 81 COI sequences (Supp. File 4) identified 24 partitioned subsets (asapscore = 6.0) and 30 delimited species. Both analyses revealed Paramacrobiotus bengalensis sp. nov. as a putative new species.
Character | N | Range | Mean | SD | Holotype | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
µm | pt | µm | pt | µm | pt | µm | pt | ||
Body length | 29 | 158–412 | 780–1117 | 295 | 899 | 85 | 94 | 193 | 925 |
Buccal tube | |||||||||
Buccal tube length | 29 | 19.2–47.0 | – | 32.8 | – | 9.2 | – | 20.9 | – |
Stylet support insertion point | 29 | 13.5–37.1 | 70.3–79.6 | 25.1 | 76.3 | 7.3 | 2.2 | 16.3 | 77.9 |
Buccal tube external width | 29 | 3.6–8.7 | 17.2–22.1 | 6.4 | 19.4 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 17.2 |
Buccal tube internal width | 29 | 2.8–7.8 | 13.1–16.6 | 5.1 | 15.4 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 13.2 |
Ventral lamina length | 29 | 9.9–25.6 | 49.2–54.5 | 17.2 | 52.4 | 4.9 | 1.6 | 10.6 | 50.8 |
Placoid lengths | |||||||||
Macroplacoid 1 | 29 | 2.8–7.1 | 14.2–15.5 | 4.8 | 14.7 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 14.2 |
Macroplacoid 2 | 29 | 1.9–5.0 | 9.7–11.8 | 3.5 | 10.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 11.3 |
Macroplacoid 3 | 29 | 3.0–7.0 | 14.1–16.7 | 5.0 | 15.5 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 15.6 |
Microplacoid | 29 | 1.0–2.7 | 4.4–7.3 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 5.5 |
Macroplacoid row | 29 | 7.7–18.2 | 36.6–42.8 | 13.3 | 40.7 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 8.7 | 41.9 |
Placoid row | 29 | 10.3–24.5 | 48.0–55.0 | 17.0 | 51.9 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 11.5 | 55.0 |
Claw I heights | |||||||||
External primary branch | 26 | 3.0–7.7 | 14.9–18.5 | 5.3 | 16.1 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 3.9 | 18.5 |
External secondary branch | 26 | 2.3–6.0 | 10.3–13.0 | 4.1 | 12.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 12.8 |
Internal primary branch | 25 | 3.0–7.7 | 15.2–18.4 | 5.3 | 16.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 3.9 | 18.4 |
Internal secondary branch | 24 | 2.3–6.0 | 11.0–13.3 | 4.0 | 12.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 13.3 |
Claw II heights | |||||||||
External primary branch | 27 | 3.1–7.8 | 15.0–18.4 | 5.3 | 16.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 3.8 | 18.4 |
External secondary branch | 27 | 2.2–6.0 | 10.2–13.4 | 4.0 | 12.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 12.0 |
Internal primary branch | 26 | 3.2–7.8 | 14.9–17.6 | 5.4 | 16.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 17.6 |
Internal secondary branch | 25 | 2.3–5.9 | 10.9–13.0 | 4.1 | 12.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 11.4 |
Claw III heights | |||||||||
External primary branch | 27 | 3.1–7.7 | 14.8–18.1 | 5.3 | 16.2 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 3.8 | 18.1 |
External secondary branch | 27 | 2.2–5.9 | 10.0–13.6 | 4.0 | 12.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 11.4 |
Internal primary branch | 23 | 3.2–7.2 | 14.8–17.6 | 5.3 | 16.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 17.6 |
Internal secondary branch | 22 | 2.3–5.4 | 10.6–13.2 | 3.9 | 12.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 11.0 |
Claw IV heights | |||||||||
Anterior primary branch | 25 | 4.5–9.7 | 20.0–25.5 | 7.3 | 22.2 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 25.5 |
Anterior secondary branch | 25 | 3.4–8.5 | 16.5–19.5 | 6.0 | 18.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 3.9 | 18.4 |
Posterior primary branch | 22 | 4.7–9.7 | 20.1–25.6 | 7.1 | 22.5 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 5.4 | 25.6 |
Posterior secondary branch | 20 | 3.5–8.5 | 16.8–19.7 | 5.8 | 18.3 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 3.9 | 16.8 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |