Asaphellus isabelae, Arcerito & Waisfeld & Balseiro, 2015
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2015n2a1 |
|
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:85E655C9-759B-4A94-8FFB-43AE11567C1A |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5210276 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/480E87D9-FF91-EC11-CAE9-FF630AA9DC9A |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Asaphellus isabelae |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Asaphellus isabelae n. sp.
( Figs 7G View FIG ; 9B View FIG ; 10 View FIG )
Asaphellus catamarcensis View in CoL – Waisfeld & Vaccari 2003: pl. 22, fig. 5; non Kobayashi, 1935.
HOLOTYPE. — CEGH-UNC 25751 ( Fig. 10E View FIG ). Type horizon DLA 28 , lower Tr 2, Quebrada del Arenal creek, lower Rupasca Member , Santa Rosita Formation , Santa Victoria Group.
MATERIAL. — 140 fragmentary specimens, including 1 partly complete individual, 20 cranidia, 48 pygidia, 28 free cheeks, 7 specimens with thoracic segments, and 12 hypostomas. Illustrated material CEGH-UNC 25749-25761.
OCCURRENCE AND AGE. — DLA 28, DLA 29, DLA 30, lower part of the Rupasca Member, Quebrada del Arenal, K. teiichii Zone , middle Tremadocian (Tr2); reworked boulder of the Cardonal Formation, Pascha-Incamayo area, K. meridionalis Zone , lower Tremadocian (Tr1).
ETYMOLOGY. — After FR Meroi Acerito’s grandmother Isabel Olivares.
D IAGNOSIS
Flat and large species of Asaphellus . Cuticle very thin, high degree of smoothness and effacement, except for the lightly impressed preglabellar furrow, pygidial axis indistinct.
DESCRIPTION
Exoskeleton large, subelliptical and flat. Isopygous with flat cephalic and pygidial borders. Cephalon semicircular, with wide border, diminishing in width towards the genal angle. Doublure subparallel to the margin. Cranidium depressed or flat; axial furrow indistinct. Glabella almost indistinguishable, faint traces of convex anterior preglabellar furrow in some specimens ( Fig. 10E, F View FIG ). Wide and subtriangular (exsag.) posterolateral projection. Posterior border and occipital ring reduced, poorly defined, and very close to posterior margin. Palpebral lobes of medium size, located at cranidial midlength. Anterior section of facial suture diverges gently forwards, bends smoothly adaxially, and converges medially to form an obtuse point sagittally in an ogive. Posterior section of facial suture curves backwards, bends downwards and slightly inwards at the level of the posterior border.
Free cheek long and relatively narrow, subtriangular with rounded external margin. Broad-based and long genal spine (55% of the total librigena length), slightly divergent from external margin.
Hypostoma elongated, oval in outline (sag.), with rounded posterior margin. Wide posterolateral border, with fine terraced lines. Median body widest (tr.) at midlength, anterior lobe convex (sag., tr.), posterior lobe short (sag.), crescentic, maculae transverse, sharply impressed.
Thorax incompletely known; almost indistinguishable from A. stenorhachis but less convex. Axis weakly convex, about 35% of the total width (tr.), defined by well impressed and slightly backward-tapering furrows; articulating furrow narrow and deep; articulating half-ring short (tr.). Pleural region moderately wide (about 65% of thoracic maximum width); pleural furrow deeper and wider medially, runs toward the anterior margin of pleura, shallower and narrower adaxially, lightly impressed abaxially. Pleural extremities obliquely truncated and backward-facing, faint marked pleural fulcra.
Pygidium of very low convexity, 57% wider than long (n=14), border and border furrow indistinct. Doublure evenly wide, about 10% length of pygidium (n = 11), subparallel to the pygidial margin along its extension. Anterior half-ring narrow (sag.), slightly convex forward.Articulating facet subtriangular, long (tr.). Anterior half-rib defined by narrow and shallow pleural furrow, remaining pleural furrows and ribs not visible.
REMARKS
Asaphellus isabelae n. sp. appears to represent an extreme in effacement, flatness, and reduction of the cuticle thickness within the group. The latter character is noteworthy, as even the sediment roughness is reproduced on the surface of the exoskeleton. Despite effacement complicates taxonomy, the extreme smoothness and flatness might be considered as an autoapomorphic character for this species.
Such a combination of characters has seldom been recorded in other Asaphellus species. For example, Asaphellus yanheensis Yin in Yin & Shanji, 1978 ( Peng 1990: pl. 7, figs 6-13) from the Nantsinkwan Formation (Tremadocian, NW Hunan, China) exhibits a thorough effacement, with blurred furrows either in the cranidia or pygidia. Though the pygidium of the Chinese species exhibits great resemblance to A. isabelae n. sp., the cranidium of the former differs in several significant respects, such as a better defined anterior ogive, a median node that is placed more forwardly, a subparallel preocular facial sutures, and postocular sutures running straight backwards.
Other species also show effacement either on the cranidium or the pygidium. Asaphellus tungtzuensis ( Sheng 1958) ( Peng 1990: pl. 8, figs 1, 2) from the Tremadocian of north west Hunan resembles A. isabelae n. sp. in the general effacement of the cranidium, however, the pygidium shows traces of axial furrows delimiting a weak axis along its length. The cranidium of Asaphellus cf. A. trinodosus Chang, 1949 ( Jell & Stait 1985) from the Florentine Valley Formation (Tremadocian, Tasmania) is largely effaced; however, the pygidial axial furrows distinctly outline a convex axis. Among the Argentinean species of Asaphellus , only A. stenorhachis (see above) exhibits a general effacement though not to the degree of that of A. isabelae n. sp. Asaphellus stenorhachis differs from the new species in the higher convexity mainly of the pygidium, a better definition of the pygidial axis in its anterior third, and the presence of some furrows, lightly impressed but discernible (for instance the border furrows in the cephalon and pygidium).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.