Pleurotroppopsis femorata ( Surekha & Narendran, 1988 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5190.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BAF2CA9A-A295-4E63-B3CD-E5B8FA24F57F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7138437 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/457787EF-FF84-FF85-D4F5-FF4CFA23C34D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pleurotroppopsis femorata ( Surekha & Narendran, 1988 ) |
status |
|
Pleurotroppopsis femorata ( Surekha & Narendran, 1988)
( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 )
Atullya femorata Surekha & Narendran, 1988: 194–195 View in CoL . Holotype ♀, DZUC (not examined).
Pleurotroppopsis femorata ( Surekha & Narendran, 1988) , Gumovsky, 2007: 11.
Diagnosis. FEMALE. Antenna dark brown, only slightly paler ventrally at base of scape. Fore wing broadly infuscate below MV, with speculum reduced ( Fig. 5b View FIGURE 5 ). Frontovertex with a median groove below anterior ocellus. Face between frontal carina and toruli hardly depressed; frontal carina straight and reduced, about 1/2 as broad as distance between eyes. Ocelli in a slightly obtuse-angled triangle. MLM with raised reticulation, without a median groove ( Fig. 5a View FIGURE 5 ). Axilla with numerous setae. Scutellum distinctly punctate, punctures coarser than those on MLM, and with numerous setae evenly distributed over entire surface; without lateral and posterior grooves ( Fig. 5a View FIGURE 5 ). Dorsellum with weak depression delimited by longitudinal carinae. Gt 1 piliferous-punctate laterally in dorsal view, with a row of setae near posterior margin ( Fig. 5a View FIGURE 5 ). Metafemur with teeth along ventral margin.
MALE. Differs from female in the following characters. Body less metallic. Fore wing hyaline. Metatibia whitish. Petiole longer. Gaster less punctate ( Figs 5d, 5e View FIGURE 5 ).
Material examined. Type material. Paratypes: 1♀, India: Kerala c. u. campus, coll. Surekha, 30.VIII.1988, 16515, with an identification label “ Atullya femorata sp. N., det. Surekha & Narendran 1988 ” ( NHMUK); 1♂, India: Kerala c. u. campus, coll. Surekha, 10.VIII.1988, S1766, with an identification label “ Atullya sp. N., det. Surekha & Narendran 1988 ” and the other identification label “ Parahorismenus , det. Bouček, 1989” ( NHMUK).
Biology. Unknown.
Distribution. India.
Remarks. Pleurotroppopsis femorata is currently only known from the type specimens. This species is uniquely characterized by a piliferous-punctate scutellum without sublateral and posterior grooves, which resembles the structure in Parahorismenus . Despite this, P. femorata fits the definition of Pleurotroppopsis used in this study. In addition, the differences given in the key to distinguish Pleurotroppopsis from Parahorismenus apply to P. femorata , such as presence of a frontal carina, and female Gt 1 with an eye-like patch. Pleurotroppopsis femorata differs from the other Pleurotroppopsis species in many other unique characters ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ), suggesting that P. femorata might be an intermediate species between Pleurotroppopsis and closely allied genera such as Parahorismenus ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 ). However, the monophyly of Pleurotroppopsis remains uncertain, and molecular data are needed to infer relationships more accurately between P. femorata and the other Pleurotroppopsis species, and even Parahorismenus species.
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pleurotroppopsis femorata ( Surekha & Narendran, 1988 )
Cao, Huan-Xi, Dale-Skey, Natalie, Burwell, Chris J. & Zhu, Chao-Dong 2022 |
Pleurotroppopsis femorata ( Surekha & Narendran, 1988 )
Gumovsky, A. 2007: 11 |
Atullya femorata
Surekha, K. & Narendran, T. 1988: 195 |