Neonotoporus leiognathi ( Hafeezullah, 1971 ) Ahmad, 1985

Martin, Storm B., Cutmore, Scott C., Ward, Selina & Cribb, Thomas H., 2017, An updated concept and revised composition for Hamacreadium Linton, 1910 (Opecoelidae: Plagioporinae) clarifies a previously obscured pattern of host-specificity among species, Zootaxa 4254 (2), pp. 151-187 : 178

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4254.2.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0BDF72E4-5330-4EE7-8560-DF44E71C1F41

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6048997

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/436E87B5-BE7D-555B-FF67-FD0FFC004F43

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Neonotoporus leiognathi ( Hafeezullah, 1971 ) Ahmad, 1985
status

 

Neonotoporus leiognathi ( Hafeezullah, 1971) Ahmad, 1985 View in CoL

Synonyms: Hamacreadium leiognathi Hafeezullah, 1971 .

Records. From the goldstripe ponyfish, Leiognathus daura (Cuvier) (Leiognathidae) , in the Arabian Sea by Hafeezullah (1971).

Remarks. Madhavi (1975) considered this species a synonym of Horatrema pristipomatis Srivastava, 1942 ( Opecoelinae Ozaki, 1925 ), but Horatrema Srivastava, 1942 was poorly characterised and was synonymised with Notoporus Yamaguti, 1938 by Ahmad (1985). However, Ahmad (1985) considered H. leiognathi to belong in Neonotoporus Srivastava, 1942 . The Stenakrinae is distinguished from the Plagioporinae by the absence of the canalicular seminal receptacle. Hafeezullah (1971) did describe a seminal receptacle but Ahmad (1985) suggested that he had mistaken it for the Mehlis’ gland. The anterior extent of the excretory vesicle was not determined, but the excretory pore was described as sub-terminal, an unusual condition for opecoelids ( Cribb 2005a). Neonotoporus is a reasonable genus for this poorly known species.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF