Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum ( Carl, 1902 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.259 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DCD1D671-B95C-4E10-8BC5-2352F25C0D1E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3796548 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/42783846-E756-9358-9A47-9EC0FB8F75DE |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum ( Carl, 1902 ) |
status |
|
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum ( Carl, 1902) View in CoL
Figs 1 View Fig , 2B–E, 3, 5A–B, D–E, 6B, 7–11, 26A
Strongylosoma nigrovirgatum Carl 1902: 567 View in CoL , figs 1, 2.
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum infuscum Jeekel 1982a: 203 View in CoL , 207; fig. 3; syn. nov.
Pogonosternum coniferum Jeekel 1965: 13 View in CoL , figs 2, 7; syn. nov.
Strongylosoma nigrovirgatum View in CoL – Brölemann 1916: 539 (mention). — Chamberlin 1920: 120 (record). — Shelley et al. 2000: 97 (record).
Akamptogonus nigrovirgatus View in CoL – Attems 1914: 222 (key, new combination), 223 (record). — Attems 1937: 253–254 (key, redescription), fig. 316. — Jeekel 1968: 18 (record). — Rowe & Sierwald 2006: 533 (mention).
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum View in CoL – Jeekel 1965: 9 (redescription, new combination), figs 1, 3–6. — Jeekel 1968: 30 (mention). — Jeekel 1981: 51 (record). — Jeekel 1982a: 202–207 (mention, key). — Decker 2016a: 16–27 (record, mention).
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum nigrovirgatum View in CoL – Mesibov 2004: 42 (record). — Nguyen & Sierwald 2013: 1158 (record).
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum infuscum View in CoL – Mesibov 2004: 42 (record). — Nguyen & Sierwald 2013: 1158 (record).
Pogonosternum coniferum View in CoL – Jeekel 1968: 20–30 (record, mention). — Jeekel 1981: 51 (record). — Jeekel 1982a: 202–208 (mention, key). — Mesibov 2004: 42 (record). — Nguyen & Sierwald 2013: 1158 (record). — Decker 2016a: 16–25 (record, mention).
Diagnosis
Differs from the other Pogonosternum species in having two lighter paramedian stripes and a median darker stripe; from P. jeekeli Decker , sp. nov., primarily by lateral process (lp) often shorter, not reaching or projecting most distad position of prolongation of femorite (prof), male tarsal and tibial brushes present to legpair 7, sometimes present to legpair 9, but then prof distinctly elongated and broadly curved.
Material studied
Lectotype (here designated) AUSTRALIA: 1 ♂ Strongylosoma nigrovirgatum , Victoria, Melbourne, leg. Konsul Martin ( GMNH) . Paralectotype (here designated)
AUSTRALIA: 1 ♀ Strongylosoma nigrovirgatum , same data as lectotype ( GMNH).
Other material examined
See Supplement 1 (total: 82 localities, 214 ♂♂, 118 ♀♀, 11 juv.)
Description
MEASUREMENTS. Length ca 1.7–2.4 cm; midbody width ca 1.7–2.2 mm.
COLOURATION. Colour in fresh material ( Figs 8 View Fig , 26A View Fig ): margin of lateral edges of collum often slightly to distinctly lighter ( Fig. 8B View Fig ). Dorsum with 2 paramedian light yellowish brown stripes and darker median brown stripe. On prozonites the trapezoidal paramedian light band slightly broader anteriorly, and on metazonites slightly broader posteriorly, broadest at 1/3 of length ( Figs 8D View Fig , 26A View Fig ). Median darker stripe narrow to rhombic, broadest 3/4 of length on metazonites and prozonites. Flanks often distinctly lighter. Area around ozopores slightly to distinctly lighter, cloudy pale ( Fig. 8C View Fig ).
STERNITES. Sometimes with slightly developed sternal cones, especially in anterior and midbody rings.
LEGS. Male tarsal and tibial brushes present from legpair 1 to 7 or 9, rarely to 8. Male coxa of legpair 6 and 7 slightly swollen to cone-like. Female coxa of legpair 2 rarely with slightly enlarged rounded
GONOPODS. Considerable variability present ( Figs 1 View Fig , 9–10 View Fig View Fig ). Femorite (F) moderately long and wide. Prolongation of femorite (prof) long to very long, S-shaped. Apical part of prof ranging from short, directed straight distad ( Fig. 9 View Fig A–D), to long, curving posterolaterally, nearly reaching tip of lateral process (lp) ( Fig. 9 View Fig E–H). Femoral process 1 (fp1) laminate, short, more or less broadly subtriangular with pointed tip, often slightly curved posteriad, not reaching lp and solenomere (S). Femoral process 2 (fp2) small, knob-like to subtriangular. Lateral process (lp) on lateral side of prof, short to long, slender, directed distolaterally, sometimes projecting distad of solenomere.
broadly extended, not lobiform and spiracular filter not or slightly protruding. Posterior spiracle ovoid with low rim, spiracular filter not protruding ( Fig. 11 View Fig ).
Distribution
From Central Gippsland and central Victoria to the Otway Ranges and Ballarat area; also present in northwestern Tasmania and on King Island ( Fig. 7 View Fig ). It has recently been found in the city of Launceston in north central Tasmania, and is apparently introduced there (with short prof).
Remarks
Carl (1902) described Strongylosoma nigrovirgatum based on one male and one female in the Muséum d’histoire naturelle de la Ville de Genève. The male right gonopod is missing. We designate the male as lectotype and female as paralectotype.
The subspecies P. nigrovirgatum infuscum , described from Central Gippsland, only differs by a broader fp1 from the nominate species. In the material studied here, including material from the type locality of P. nigrovirgatum , the width of the fp1 differed within some populations from slender to broadly infuscum -like. Pogonosternum n. infuscum is treated here as a synonym of P. nigrovirgatum .
Specimens fitting the description of P. coniferum by Jeekel (1965) are restricted to the coastal area around Port Philip Bay. These have a very long and curved prof, a moderate to long lp, and male tarsal and tibial brushes present from legpair 1 to 9 ( Fig. 9 View Fig E–H), while in P. nigrovirgatum sensu stricto, distributed from northern central Victoria to Gippsland, prof and lp are short and tarsal and tibial brushes are present to legpair 7 ( Fig. 9 View Fig A–D). However, the Tasmanian, Otway Ranges and western central Victorian populations contain long coniferum -like ( Fig. 9 View Fig E–H) to intermediate states of prof ( Fig. 10 View Fig ), sometimes both forms present within one population, with male brushes ranging to legpair 7, except in Brisbane Ranges National Park to legpair 9. Pogonosternum coniferum is here made a synonym of P. nigrovirgatum due to the existence of these intermediate forms and the fact that P. coniferum clusters with P. nigrovirgatum in a phylogenetic analysis based on mitochondrial COI and 16S rDNA sequences ( Decker 2016a).
The mention of Pogonosternum in northwestern Tasmania by Jeekel (1982a: 202) probably refers to P. nigrovirgatum , although Jeekel does not state what material he examined.
GMNH |
Georgia Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum ( Carl, 1902 )
Decker, Peter, Mesibov, Robert, Voigtländer, Karin & Xylander, Willi E. R. 2017 |
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum nigrovirgatum
Nguyen A. D. & Sierwald P. 2013: 1158 |
Mesibov R. 2004: 42 |
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum infuscum
Nguyen A. D. & Sierwald P. 2013: 1158 |
Mesibov R. 2004: 42 |
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum infuscum
Jeekel C. A. W. 1982: 203 |
Pogonosternum coniferum
Decker P. 2016: 16 |
Nguyen A. D. & Sierwald P. 2013: 1158 |
Mesibov R. 2004: 42 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 1982: 202 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 1981: 51 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 1968: 20 |
Pogonosternum coniferum
Jeekel C. A. W. 1965: 13 |
Pogonosternum nigrovirgatum
Decker P. 2016: 16 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 1982: 202 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 1981: 51 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 1968: 30 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 1965: 9 |
Strongylosoma nigrovirgatum
Shelley R. M. & Sierwald P. & Kiser S. B. & Golovatch S. I. 2000: 97 |
Chamberlin R. V. 1920: 120 |
Brolemann H. W. 1916: 539 |
Akamptogonus nigrovirgatus
Rowe M. & Sierwald P. 2006: 533 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 1968: 18 |
Attems C. M. T. 1937: 253 |
Attems C. M. T. 1914: 222 |
Strongylosoma nigrovirgatum
Carl J. 1902: 567 |