Tedoribaatar reini
sp. nov.
Figs. 8
View Fig
, 9
View Fig
.
Etymology: In honor of Dr. Johannes Justus Rein, a German geographer who first collected fossil plants from the Kuwajima Formation (reported by Geyler 1877).
Holotype:
SBEI 1570
, fragment of right lower jaw with p4 ( Figs. 8
View Fig
, 9
View Fig
).
Type locality: “Kuwajima Kaseki−kabe” site, Shiramine district, Hakusan City, Ishikawa Prefecture, central Japan.
Type horizon: Upper part of the Kuwajima Formation (Tetori Group), Barremian to early Aptian (Early Cretaceous).
Diagnosis.—Lower dental formula 1.0.?2.?2; lower p3 single−rooted; p4 having ten serrations and one posterior labial cusp. Differs from other “plagiaulacidans,” including eobaatarids, in having a small number of lower permanent premolars and a single−rooted p3.
Description.—SBEI 1570, fragmentary right dentary preserves p 4 in the holotype ( Figs. 8
View Fig
, 9
View Fig
). The other teeth are not known. The dental formula of lower dentition is 1.0.?2.?2.
SBEI 1570 ( Figs. 8
View Fig
, 9
View Fig
) does not preserve a definitive mental foramen. At 1.5 mm anterior to p4 and 1.2 mm above ventral margin of the dentary, there is a relatively large hole that might be in the position of the mental foramen. The masseteric fossa extends anteriorly below the posterior root of p4, and becomes indistinct below the anterior root of p4. Broken alveoli for a p3 and a double−rooted m1 are preserved anterior and posterior to p4, respectively ( Figs. 8
View Fig
, 9
View Fig
). There is no trace of two roots in the broken alveolus of a p3, though the possibility that the p3 was double−rooted cannot be definitely ruled out. Anterior to the alveolus of p3, there is a tiny pit that is possibly an alveolus for a shed dp2. There is no trace of permanent p2.
The p4 is not fully parallel−sided and is neither fully arcuate nor rectangular in lateral view. The U−shaped anterior triangular lobe is large relative to crown size; it extends postero−ventrally. The anterior part of p4 probably slightly overhung p3. The fourth lower premolar has ten serrations, eight of which (except for the terminal ones) are accompanied by ridges. Only one posterior labial cusp is present. It is located high on the crown, somewhat above half the height of the distal margin of p4 ( Figs. 8
View Fig
, 9
View Fig
). The position of this cusp is higher than that in
Hakusanobaatar matsuoi
. Dorsally, a wear facet extends from a position above the last serration to the anterior end of this cusp. The length of the posterior root of the p4 is modest, and is less than twice as long as the anterior one ( Figs. 8
View Fig
, 9
View Fig
).
Measurements.—See Table 1.
Remarks.—The tiny pit positioned anterior to the alveolus of p 3 in SBEI 1570 is interpreted as an alveolus for a shed dp2. The mental foramen is usually larger than this pit, and is situated in lower position on the labial side of the dentary, possibly at the position of the large hole in SBEI 1570. There is a possibility that the tiny pit is a foramen for a blood vessel; however, this is unlikely because such a foramen does not normally open to the occlusal surface of the dentary. The lower cheek teeth of multituberculates are obliquely arranged to the dentary in occlusal view. Taking this into account, the position of the pit is thought to be just anterior to the p 3 in tooth row, and it is the position of a p2, if present. Therefore, this tiny pit is more likely to be an alveolus for a dp2 or p2 than a blood vessel foramen. This alveolus is very tiny and it is hard to imagine that it contained a tooth. The alveolus is, thus, thought to be for a shed dp2. Lacking the eruption of a permanent p2, the alveolus is interpreted to have become reduced its size.
Tedoribaatar reini
is, therefore, thought to have had only two lower permanent premolars.
Tedoribaatar reini
is thought to have had only two lower permanent premolars. The pit situated anterior to the alveolus for p3 on the holotype (SBEI 1570) is interpreted as the alveolus for a shed dp2, as mentioned above, and no trace of a permanent p2 is present. Although there is a possibility that this pit is a blood vessel foramen, it still is the case that
T. reini
does not have p2. Cimolodontans have at most only two lower premolars ( Kielan−Jaworowska et al. 2004), but the morphology of the p4 seen in
T. reini
is intermediate between the typical “plagiaulacidan” and cimolodontan conditions. In lateral view p4 of
T. reini
is neither fully arcuate nor extended forward to overhang the crown of p3 as seen in cimolodontans. From the size of the alveolus, p3 of
Tedoribaatar reini
is estimated to have been larger than the peg−like p3 of cimolodontans.
Tedoribaatar reini
is, therefore, assigned to “Plagiaulacida”.
Tedoribaatar reini
has a single−rooted p3, which indicates that the p3 crown was reduced.
Tedoribaatar reini
differs from “plagiaulacidans” except for eobaatarids and
Arginbaatar
in this feature (see Trofimov 1980; Kielan−Jaworowska et al. 1987; Kielan−Jaworowska et al. 2004). The morphology of p4 of
T. reini
is clearly different from that of
Arginbaatar
, which has a highly arcuate, specialized p4, and is rather similar to those of eobaatarids (see Trofimov 1980; Kielan−Jaworowska et al. 1987). The number of serrations of p4 (ten) is in the range of
Eobaataridae
.
Tedoribaatar reini
is tentatively considered as a member of the
Eobaataridae
and the most derived “plagiaulacidan” multituberculate yet discovered.
Compared with eobaatarids,
T. reini
is almost the same size as
Eobaatar magnus
and
Hakusanobaatar matsuoi
, and slightly smaller than
Sinobaatar lingyuanensis
( Table 1).
Tedoribaatar reini
shares a reduced p3 with
Eobaatar
,
Sinobaatar
(see Kielan−Jaworowska et al. 1987; Hu and Wang 2002a, b) and
Hakusanobaatar
.
Tedoribaatar reini
is, however, distinguished from
Hakusanobaatar matsuoi
, discovered from the same locality, by the higher position of the posterior labial cusp of the p4 and the antero−posteriorly shorter posterior root of the p4. A single−rooted p3 is present only in
T. reini
among “plagiaulacidans”, and clearly distinguishes
T. reini
from
Eobaatar
,
Sinobaatar
(see Kielan−Jaworowska et al. 1987; Hu and Wang 2002a, b) and
Hakusanobaatar
.
Tedoribaatar reini
also differs from
Eobaatar
,
Sinobaatar
, and
Hakusanobaatar
in having a lower number of lower premolars. The lack of p2 and a single−rooted p3 are clearly apomorphic characters among “plagiaulacidans”.
Tedoribaatar reini
is, therefore, recognized as a new genus and species of
Eobaataridae
, and as a species that is most closely related to cimolodontans among “plagiaulacidans”, although it can not be compared with the other three eobaatarid and?eobaatarid genera (
Monobaatar
,
Loxaulax
and
Parendotherium
) whose p4s have not been discovered.