Naineris elegans, Álvarez & Haggin, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5492.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DD79929A-C343-467F-A3AB-31FC7E59705C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13286450 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF84D183-FA7D-442D-B0E1-9E193A959555 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:DF84D183-FA7D-442D-B0E1-9E193A959555 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Naineris elegans |
status |
sp. nov. |
Naineris elegans sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:DF84D183-FA7D-442D-B0E1-9E193A959555
( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 )
Material examined. USA, North Pacific Ocean, California, Los Angeles County, Palos Verdes Peninsula , Lunada Bay , Sta. MBC 20801 View Materials , coll. R. Wetzer et al., 18 Feb 2019, ~ 33.769°N, ~ 118.422°W, intertidal algae wash, hand collected, holotype ( LACM-AHF Poly 11164); GoogleMaps west of Redondo Beach , Sta. Bight 13 9257, 33.82928°N, 118.416°W, 18 m, soft sediment, van Veen grab, 1.0 mm sieve, coll. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 26 July 2013, paratype ( LACM-AHF Poly 13426) GoogleMaps .
Measurements: Holotype 37 mm long, 2.2 mm wide, for 84 chaetigers.
Diagnosis. Spatulate prostomium. Multiple dorsal sensory organs oval to rounded, voluminous, seven per side in most chaetigers, with a brown pigmented base; arranged in two distinct groups in the most anterior segments, then forming two subtriangular groups with apex displaced medially in the following ones, reaching each other. Thoracic notopodial lobes pear-shaped with blunt tips. Thoracic neuropodial lobe with an upper rounded papilla. Thoracic neurochaetae with 5–6 transverse, posterior rows of numerous subuluncini; a transverse, anterior row of about 20 crenulate capillaries; an inferior, anterior, oblique row of about 20 hooded uncini and an inferior, posterior, oblique row of capillaries.
Description: A medium-sized species. Color in alcohol pale yellow with a conspicuous brown pigmentation around base of dorsal organs, adopting a V-shaped form in abdominal segments ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ). Body narrow without width distinction between thorax and abdomen. Changes in parapodia mark distinction between thorax-abdomen. Ventrally thorax smooth, but abdominal chaetigers tri-annulate with central ring widest.
Prostomium spatulate, with rounded borders ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ); eyespots diffuse; nuchal organs present at posterior end of prostomium and anterior end of peristomium. Peristomium with two achaetous rings well defined ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Mouth opening with lips striated; proboscis wide, multi-lobed ( Fig. 5A–D View FIGURE 5 ).
Branchiae from chaetiger 6, long, cirriform, with fine prolonged apex, glandular, ciliated, with dark pigmentation along axis; thoracic branchiae reaching midline in thoracic segments; abdominal branchiae longer, reaching across the midline to the opposite branchial base in the abdomen. Dorsal sensory organs per segment present from chaetiger 10; oval to rounded, voluminous, seven per side in most chaetigers, with a brown pigmented base ( Fig. 5F View FIGURE 5 ); arranged in two distinct groups in the most anterior segments, then forming two subtriangular groups with apex displaced medially in the following ones, reaching each other ( Fig. 5F View FIGURE 5 ). Dorsal crest reduced, straight, thin, with no evidence of cilia ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ).
Thorax with 36 chaetigers (~6 transitional segments with intermediate characteristics between thoracic and abdominal segments), dorsoventrally depressed, straight ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ). Parapodia biramous, interramal papillae and prechaetal lobe absent. Thoracic notopodial lobes pear-shaped with blunt tips ( Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 ). Abdominal notopodial lobes lanceolate, with evident constriction ( Fig. 5G View FIGURE 5 ). Thoracic neuropodial lobes represented by a flange with upper rounded papillae ( Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 ). Abdominal neuropodial lobes triangular, laterally projected ( Fig. 5G View FIGURE 5 ).
Thoracic notochaetae include 20–30 crenulate capillaries in two groups ( Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 ). Abdominal notochaetae with 20–30 crenulate capillaries in two groups; furcate chaetae not observed. Thoracic neurochaetae with seven transverse rows of 20–30 subuluncini and an inferior, oblique row of uncini intermixed with crenulate capillaries ~20–25 each ( Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 ). Abdominal neurochaetae include 10–15 crenulate capillaries and three acicular spines intermixed.
Pygidium unknown (complete paratype bears four anal cirri as typical in Naineris species.
Variation: Thorax with 35 chaetigers (~4 transitional) and dorsal sensory organs from chaetiger 13 in paratype. Paratype width at chaetiger 50: 1.4 mm.
Remarks: The material examined here were identified as Naineris sp. DC1 (T. Phillips, unpublished data) by SCAMIT. A comparison of these specimens with N. bicornis (type locality Florida, Gulf of Mexico) and N. australis (type locality Adelaide, Australia) showed that the material from the Northeastern Pacific Ocean represents a separate species. Naineris elegans sp. nov. resembles N. bicornis and N. australis in the chaetal arrangement and presence of multiple dorsal organs. However, the thoracic notopodial lobes of N. australis are cirriform, whereas those of N. bicornis are lanceolate, with triangular tips, but pear-shaped with blunt tips in N. elegans sp. nov. ( Fig. 6- C View FIGURE 6 ). Abdominal notopodial lobes also differ; in N. australis , they are cirriform, whereas in N. bicornis and N. elegans sp. nov. they are lanceolate ( Fig. 6D–F View FIGURE 6 ). Another consistent difference between N. elegans sp. nov. and N. bicornis are the thoracic neuropodial lobes. In N. elegans sp. nov. these lobes have a rounded projection, whereas they are a triangular, in N. bicornis ( Fig. 6A–C View FIGURE 6 ).
Etymology: Latin for elegant, referring to the conspicuous delicate multiple dorsal organs, especially those from thoracic segments.
Distribution: USA, Southern California Bight province, Santa Monica Bay; intertidal to 18 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Family |
|
Genus |