Merismomorpha Girault, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/jhr.97.135648 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D3473710-0E18-413F-BBFD-4BC62CB66C7C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13990506 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/40F24B5D-E64C-5E2C-959C-3D11BCE23B5F |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Merismomorpha Girault, 1913 |
status |
|
Merismomorpha Girault, 1913 View in CoL
Epipolycystus Girault, 1915: 336. Type species: Epipolycystus asilus Girault, 1915, by original designation. Synonymy by Bouček (1988: 461). View in CoL
Giorgionia Girault, 1933. Type species: Giorgionia flavipetiole Girault, 1933, by monotypy. Synonymy by Bouček (1988: 461). View in CoL
Neopolycystella Girault, 1915: 336. Type species: Neopolycystella sicarius Girault, 1915, by original designation. Synonymy by Bouček (1988: 461). View in CoL
Type species.
Merismomorpha acutiventris Girault, 1913 View in CoL , by original designation Girault (1913: 82–83).
Diagnosis.
Head without occipital carina (Fig. 7 View Figures 1–7 ). Gena with a shallow malar depression; genal lamina absent. Clypeal margin medially produced, subconical (Figs 5 View Figures 1–7 , 17 View Figures 14–17 ). Antennal formula 11354 (Fig. 5 View Figures 1–7 ); flagellum slightly or obviously clavate; clava symmetric, area of micropilosity large, extending from distal clv 1 to clv 4 (Fig. 5 View Figures 1–7 ). Antenna inserted above lower ocular line; antennal protuberance absent; scrobes shallow (Figs 5 View Figures 1–7 , 17 View Figures 14–17 ). Pronotum short with collar not carinate (Figs 1 View Figures 1–7 , 7 View Figures 1–7 , 14 View Figures 14–17 ); notauli complete (Figs 7 View Figures 1–7 , 15 View Figures 14–17 ) or incomplete. Mesoscutellum arched, frenal area not raised (Figs 1 View Figures 1–7 , 14 View Figures 14–17 ). Propodeum reticulate with conspicuous, long and posteriorly converging plical furrows; costula and median carina absent, nucha distinct; propodeal spiracle inserted close to anterior propodeal margin (Fig. 7 View Figures 1–7 ). Fore wing hyaline, with distinct speculum; mv not widened and longer than stv and pmv (Figs 3 View Figures 1–7 , 16 View Figures 14–17 ). Hind coxa dorsally bare (Fig. 4 View Figures 1–7 , 14 View Figures 14–17 ). Petiole in dorsal view smooth and fusiform (Fig. 2 View Figures 1–7 ); in lateral view appears as bipartite and curved (Fig. 4 View Figures 1–7 ). Mt 2 large with tapered base (Fig. 2 View Figures 1–7 ), cerci with setae subequal in length, ovipositor shortly protruding.
Remarks.
Merismomorpha Girault belongs to a small group of pteromaline genera with elongated petiole ( Bouček 1988); it looks similar to Pterosemopsis Girault, 1917 , with which it could be confused. Indeed, the two genera exhibit shared characters: a lower clypeal margin medially produced and subconical (Figs 5 View Figures 1–7 , 10 View Figures 8–13 , 17 View Figures 14–17 ); antennal formula 11354 (Figs 5 View Figures 1–7 , 8 View Figures 8–13 ); antennal toruli situated above level of lower ocular line (Figs 5 View Figures 1–7 , 10 View Figures 8–13 , 17 View Figures 14–17 ); propodeum with converging plical furrows (Figs 7 View Figures 1–7 , 9 View Figures 8–13 , 11 View Figures 8–13 ); long and smooth petiole (Figs 2 View Figures 1–7 , 11 View Figures 8–13 ). However, Merismomorpha differs from Pterosemopsis by the petiole in lateral view appears as bipartite and curved (Fig. 4 View Figures 1–7 ) vs petiole in lateral view appears as single and not curved in lateral view (Fig. 8 View Figures 8–13 ); frenal area of mesoscutellum not raised (Fig. 1 View Figures 1–7 ) vs raised (Figs 8 View Figures 8–13 , 12 View Figures 8–13 ); collar margin of pronotum not carinate (Fig. 1 View Figures 1–7 ) vs carinate (Fig. 8 View Figures 8–13 ).
Accurate circumscription and diagnoses of these genera have not been published yet and only the key to Australasian genera of Pteromalidae ( Bouček 1988) can be used to separate them, which could be troublesome for Oriental species. Indeed, some of the species of Pterosemopsis have erroneously been identified as belonging to Merismomorpha . Likewise, some species of Merismomorpha may not belong here (e. g. M. gatra ) ( Sureshan et al. 2006) and the two genera are in need of revision.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Merismomorpha Girault, 1913
Tselikh, Ekaterina V., Rasplus, Jean-Yves, Lee, Jaehyeon, Dale-Skey, Natalie, Gupta, Ankita & Ku, Deok-Seo 2024 |
Giorgionia
Bouček Z 1988: 461 |
Giorgionia Girault, 1933 . Type species: Giorgionia flavipetiole Girault, 1933 , by monotypy. Synonymy by Bouček (1988: 461) . |
Epipolycystus
Bouček Z 1988: 461 |
Girault AA 1915: 336 |
Neopolycystella
Bouček Z 1988: 461 |
Girault AA 1915: 336 |
Merismomorpha acutiventris
Girault AA 1913: 82 - 83 |