Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville, 1828
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2014.95 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BE14FE18-E9AB-4C5A-B260-BD9C54464A2A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3861163 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3E519972-9F03-2705-FDB2-8008FD20FB0C |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville, 1828 |
status |
|
Genus Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville, 1828 View in CoL View at ENA
Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville, 1828: 403 View in CoL (not Scrapter Lepeletier, 1841: 260 View in CoL ). Type species: Scrapter bicolor Lepeletier and Serville, 1828 View in CoL , by subsequent designation in Vachal (1897: 63). (For later type designations and confusion with Scrapter Lepeletier View in CoL , see Michener 1997.)
Polyglossa Friese, 1909: 123 . Type species: Polyglossa capensis Friese, 1909 , by subsequent designation in Cockerell (1921: 203). (For a later type designation by Sandhouse, see Michener 1997.)
Strandiella Friese, 1912: 181 . Type species: Strandiella longula Friese, 1912 = Scrapter niger Lepeletier & Serville, 1828 View in CoL , by subsequent designation in Cockerell (1916: 430).
Polyglossa (Parapolyglossa) Brauns, 1929: 134 . Type species: Polyglossa heterodoxa Cockerell, 1921 , by subsequent designation in Sandhouse (1943: 584) (see Michener 1997).
Detailed diagnoses and descriptions of Scrapter View in CoL were provided by Eardley (1996), Engel (2005), Davies & Brothers (2006) and Michener (2007), so they are not repeated here. Regarding the availability of Scrapterini versus Scraptrinae see Ascher & Engel (2006). Scrapter View in CoL shows an unusual level of intrageneric diversity, described in detail by Davies & Brothers (2006), so various authors suggested that after revision the genus could be split up into several (sub)genera ( Engel 2005; Melo & Gonçalves 2005; Michener 2007). The current system of species-groups suggested by Eardley (1996) does not convincingly reflect this diversity, as it partly contains morphologically heterogenous and presumably paraphyletic species-groups. The S. flavostictus View in CoL -group is an example of such an inhomogeneous assemblage and includes the first described "euryglossiform" Scrapter View in CoL , S. albitarsis View in CoL . This species and its relatives are here transferred to a new species-group.
The group of "euryglossiform" Scrapter
The term "euryglossiform" Scrapter is introduced here for a group of morphologically monotonous species, including the smallest bees of the genus (3.5–7.0 mm), that are predominantly black, often with yellow markings on the legs. This species-group can also be referred to as the S. albitarsis -group, named after the first described species. In their body shape, sparse pilosity, surface sculpture and narrow groove-like facial fovea they superficially resemble andreniform Euryglossinae . These similarities might be convergent ( Michener 2007: 171) but potentially reflect the presumed sister-group relationship of the Australian Euryglossinae and Scraptrinae ( Almeida & Danforth 2009) .
The species of the "euryglossiform" Scrapter are characterized by a) a sulcus-like facial fovea with an invisible bottom as in Hylaeus (e.g., Fig. 1D View Fig ), b) basitibial plate of female with simple marginal carinae, c) body small, without metasomal hair bands in females and most males, and d) membraneous apicolateral lobes on male S7 (e.g., Fig. 5D View Fig ), sometimes reduced to small structures, in nine of the 14 species where the males are known. In other Scrapter species these lobes, that are a common feature in many colletid genera, are only known in a much more reduced form from some species of the S. nitidus -group. This group also shares the narrow facial fovea and the shape of male genitalia with the "euryglossiform" Scrapter and might be their closest relatives as Davies et al. (2005) already suggested in their description of S. acanthophorus .
As relationships of species within the "euryglossiform" Scrapter are not clear, they are listed in alphabetical order.
Species of "euryglossiform" Scrapter
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville, 1828
Kuhlmann, Michael 2014 |
Polyglossa (Parapolyglossa)
Sandhouse G. A. 1943: 584 |
Brauns H. 1929: 134 |
Strandiella
Cockerell T. D. A. 1916: 430 |
Friese H. 1912: 181 |
Polyglossa
Cockerell T. D. A. 1921: 203 |
Friese H. 1909: 123 |
Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville, 1828: 403
Vachal 1897: 63 |
Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau A. L. M. 1841: 260 |
Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau A. L. M. & Serville A. 1828: 403 |