Lysitermus tritoma ( Boucek , 1956)

Achterberg, Cornelis van, Skeppstedt, Fredrik & Vaeaenaenen, Simo, 2021, Revision of the Palaearctic species of Lysitermus Foerster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Hormiinae), ZooKeys 1040, pp. 65-89 : 73-77

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1040.66274

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:63E20193-A7C8-420F-99C3-23ED54706BB4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7213057

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3DC6A9F0-C2F0-5CA2-8620-78310B4BBA8B

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Lysitermus tritoma ( Boucek , 1956)
status

 

Lysitermus tritoma ( Boucek, 1956) Figs 12 View Figure 12 , 13-18 View Figures 13–18 , 19-21 View Figures 19–21 , 22-25 View Figures 22–25 , 26-27 View Figures 26–27 , 28-29 View Figures 28–29

Rogadinaspis tritoma Bouček, 1956: 441.

Lysitermus tritoma ; Hedqvist, 1963: 35; Shenefelt 1975: 1155; van Achterberg 1991: 20; Gupta and Quicke 2018: 429; Mifsud et al. 2019: 54 [examined].

Paracedria suecicus Hedqvist, 1957: 219.

Lysitermus suecicus ; Hedqvist, 1963: 35 (as synonym of L. pallidus ); Shenefelt 1975: 1155; van Achterberg 1991: 20; Gupta and Quicke 2018: 429; Mifsud et al. 2019: 54 [examined]. Syn. nov.

Material.

1 ♀ (FMNH), " Finland: Ab, Parainen, Pexor , 60.26°N, 22.25°E, Malaise trap 1a, 25.vi.-6.vii.2020, Juho Paukkunen" GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀ (CSV), same label data, but 6-19.vii.2020, Juho Paukkunen & Jonathan Scotson; 1 ♀ + 1 ♂ (RMNH), "S. Sweden: Uppland, Edsbro , Kristineholm, S15 or S20, coll. 28.i.2009, ex Inonotus radiatus on Alnus glutinosa , C. Gonzales Alonso, RMNH’11” ; 1 ♂ (RMNH), " Netherlands: UT, UTM FF 6560, Amerongen , unmanaged Quercus robur [forest], ex dead stem [in] cage 9(h), 29.v.-12.vi.2001, L. Moraal, RMNH’02” ; 1 ♀ (NMS), " France: Lot-et-Garonne, Bernac , 28.vii.[19]90, M.R. Shaw "; 1 ♀ + 2 ♂ (RMNH), " Spain, Llansa , 1986, ex Luffia lapidella , H. Hendrickx, RMNH’96”; 1 ♀ (RMNH) , " Portugal, Oeiras , 18-22.viii.1979, A. van Harten " ; 9 ♀ + 4 ♂ (RMNH), " Portugal, Cascais fort, ex Luffia lapidella , coll. 27.vii.1994, H. Hendrickx " ; 5 ♀ + 3 ♂ (RMNH), idem, but coll. 4.v.1995, ex Luffia sp .; 1 ♀ (RMNH), idem, but coll. 1.iii.1995 ; 10 ♀ + 2 ♂ (RMNH, ZJUH), idem, but Cascais (and mislabelled as from Azores), ex Luffia ferchaultella ( Psych. ), coll. 27.vii.1994, em. 21.viii.1994 ; 2 ♀ (RMNH, MTMA) " Italy: Sardinia centr., Bruncu Istiddi , 900 m, ex Luffia sp. n.?, viii.1975, E. Hartig & Gozmany" ; 1 ♀ + 1 ♂ (NMS), " Malta, Buscett , 22.xi.2006, ex larva on Luffia lapidella (Goeze, 1783) [ Psychidae ], M. Zerafa" ; 2 ♀ + 1 ♂ (NMS), " Malta: Mosta valley, larva on Eudarcia derrai ( Gaedike , 1983) [ Tineidae ], coll. 22.ii.2010, em. v.2010, M. Zerafa " ; 3 ♀ + 5 ♂ (BZL, NMS), " Romania: Siebenbürgen, Munt Apuseni ( Trascaului ), Umg. Posaga 2 km oberhalb, 600 m, ex Dahlica rakosy oder Apt. Dahlica helicoidella [ Psychidae ], em. Ende April 2005, M. Weidlich " ; 2 ♀ + 1 ♂ (BZL, NMS), " Bulgaria: Macedonia, Pirin planina - Süd, Umg. Jane Sandanski , 1220 m, el. 13.v.2000, M. Weidlich, ex Dahlica sp. [ Psychidae ]" .

Redescription.

Figured ♀ from France (NMS), length of body 1.6 mm and of fore wing 1.4 mm.

Head. Antenna 1.1 × as long as fore wing, with 15 segments, rather widened apically (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 ), scapus oblique apically, length of third segment 1.1 × fourth segment; third, fourth and penultimate segments 5.0, 4.5, and 3.1 × their width, respectively; face largely smooth, with long erect setae and 1.7 × wider than high; clypeus smooth, upper half distinctly convex and ventral half depressed; head in dorsal view 1.8 × broader than long medially, eye 1.4 × longer than temple dorsally, strongly and roundly narrowed posteriorly (Fig. 18 View Figures 13–18 ); vertex smooth and shiny, including area near stemmaticum (Fig. 18 View Figures 13–18 ); occipital carina moderately strong and in front of it indistinctly micro-crenulate; POL: diameter of posterior ocellus: OOL = 2:2:3; eye in lateral view 1.6 × as high as wide, temple distinctly broadening ventrally, smooth and width of eye 1.6 × minimum width of temple laterally (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 ); malar space 0.4 × as long as height of eye and 1.5 × as long as basal width of mandible; frons smooth and shiny.

Mesosoma. Mesosoma 1.5 × as long as high in lateral view; mesoscutum granulate and with 2 rather short carinulae and no medio-posterior groove (Fig. 14 View Figures 13–18 ); notauli shallow, distinctly developed anteriorly and posterior half obsolescent, largely smooth and anteriorly connected to lateral irregular carina; scutellar sulcus with 1 carina; scutellum smooth and shiny, convex (Fig. 14 View Figures 13–18 ); propodeum shiny, largely smooth between carinae and with large areola, its median carina approx. as long as anterior side of areola (Fig. 14); side of pronotum rugose-crenulate and with some granulate sculpture; mesopleuron largely smooth and convex (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 ); precoxal sulcus rather deep and only in anterior half present, with few crenulae anteriorly; metapleuron largely smooth and with long setae; mesosternal sulcus deep, narrow and smooth. Wings. Fore wing: pterostigma elongate triangular and 3.5 × longer than wide (Fig. 13 View Figures 13–18 ), r issued from its middle and slightly longer than width of pterostigma; 2-SR completely absent (Fig. 13 View Figures 13–18 ); 3-SR 1.5 × longer than r; SR1 straight and reaching tip of wing; m-cu rather short (Fig. 13 View Figures 13–18 ); subdiscal cell distally closed, CU1b close to m-cu and CU1a at same level as 2-CU1 (Fig. 13 View Figures 13–18 ). Legs. Hind coxa largely smooth; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 5.0, 9.2, and 5.2 × their width, respectively; hind tarsus hardly compressed.

Metasoma. Length of first tergite 0.6 × its apical width, its dorsal surface evenly convex, surface longitudinally striate and with additional granulate sculpture between striae, its dorsal carinae lamelliform and medially interconnected; medial length of second tergite 0.9 × its basal width, and 1.4 × as long as third tergite; second and third tergites longitudinally striate and with distinct secondary granulate sculpture; second transverse suture coarsely crenulate and nearly straight (Fig. 15 View Figures 13–18 ); third tergite antero-laterally without minute tooth-shaped protuberance and distinctly narrowed posteriorly (Figs 15 View Figures 13–18 , 16 View Figures 13–18 ), with distinct smooth and shiny apical rim (Fig. 15 View Figures 13–18 ); apical lamella of third metasomal tergite moderately protruding laterally (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 ), concave and wide in dorsal view, with approx. 8 carinae (Fig. 16 View Figures 13–18 ); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.21 × as long as fore wing and 0.6 × as long as hind tibia, slightly widened apically (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 ).

Colour. Dark brown; third tergite dark brown, contrasting with largely yellowish brown second tergite (Figs 15 View Figures 13–18 , 16 View Figures 13–18 ); first tergite yellowish brown; antenna (basal segments yellowish), pterostigma (but basal fifth yellow) and veins M+CU1 apically, 1-CU1, 1-M, and veins of apical half of fore wing dark brown (Fig. 13 View Figures 13–18 ); palpi and tarsi pale yellowish; remainder of legs yellowish brown; wing membrane infuscate, but band below base of pterostigma and marginal cell partly, subhyaline (Fig. 13 View Figures 13–18 ).

Variations. Antenna with 14-17 segments; length of body 1.5-1.9 mm, and of fore wing 1.3-1.5 mm; length of ovipositor sheath 0.21-0.26 × as long as fore wing; vein 2-SR of fore wing varies from completely absent (Figs 13 View Figures 13–18 , 19 View Figures 19–21 ), complete (Fig. 29 View Figures 28–29 ) to small unsclerotised trace (Fig. 45 View Figures 45–47 ); notauli complete to posterior third obsolescent; scutellar sulcus with 1-3 carinae; precoxal sulcus smooth or with few crenulae; metapleuron largely smooth or with some rugulae medially; median carina of propodeum approx. as long as anterior side of areola or much shorter; second metasomal tergite 1.3-1.5 × longer than second tergite; lamella of third tergite hardly serrate (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 ), with 8-16 carinae; colour of body is very variable: southern specimens are brownish yellow with only third tergite dark brown and northern specimens are largely dark brown (except first and second tergites, but in both Finnish specimens also darkened; Figs 27 View Figures 26–27 - 29 View Figures 28–29 ), sometimes hind coxa, femur and tibia largely brown or dark brown (Fig. 29 View Figures 28–29 ).

Male. Very similar to female, but metasoma slenderer (Fig. 20 View Figures 19–21 ); antenna with 16 or 17 segments; length of body 1.4-1.6 mm, and of fore wing 1.3 mm; head dark brown dorsally; linear medio-posterior depression of mesoscutum absent or slightly impressed; third tergite dark brown and contrasting with yellowish second tergite (Fig. 20 View Figures 19–21 ), striate and/or granulate and its lamella hardly serrate (Figs 19-21 View Figures 19–21 , 45 View Figures 45–47 ); pterostigma dark brown basally.

Biology.

Reared from lepidopterous case-bearing larvae belonging to Psychidae ( Luffia ferchaultella (Stephens, 1850); L. lapidella (Goeze, 1783); L. sp.; Dahlica sp.) and Tineidae ( Eudarcia derrai (Gaedike, 1983); Mifsud et al. 2019). It has been reared from Inonotus radiatus bracket fungi on Alnus glutinosa ( L. ) ( Jonsell et al. 2016), most likely from host cases hiding in the fungi.

Distribution.

*Bulgaria, Czech Rep., *Finland, *France, Italy (Sardinia), Malta, *Netherlands, Poland, *Portugal (mainland), *Romania, *Spain (mainland), Sweden.

Notes.

The medio-longitudinal carina of the propodeum is very variable in length, from about as long as oblique anterior side of propodeal areola to much shorter and the second metasomal suture varies from distinctly sinuate (typical L. tritoma ; Figs 24 View Figures 22–25 , 25 View Figures 22–25 ) to straight (typical L. suecicus ; Figs 15 View Figures 13–18 , 20 View Figures 19–21 , 22 View Figures 22–25 ). After more reared specimens became available, intermediates of both characters have been found, and there are no grounds to separate any longer the two species, as has been proposed by van Achterberg (1991).

The holotype of L. suecicus (NRS) is incorrectly figured in the original description. For instance, the second tergite is not twice as long as the third tergite but 1.5 × (Fig. 22 View Figures 22–25 ), the ovipositor sheath is not widened but subparallel, and the pterostigma is not robust but rather slender (Fig. 22 View Figures 22–25 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Braconidae

Genus

Lysitermus

Loc

Lysitermus tritoma ( Boucek , 1956)

Achterberg, Cornelis van, Skeppstedt, Fredrik & Vaeaenaenen, Simo 2021
2021
Loc

Paracedria suecicus

Hedqvist 1957
1957
Loc

Rogadinaspis tritoma

Boucek 1956
1956