Deuterophlebia pachychaeta, Zheng & Zhou, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.70.108096 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:95E6EB75-94FA-4DA7-9DE4-D3324C9ED1CE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/99503019-F78C-49B5-B602-8CE1D53BD96A |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:99503019-F78C-49B5-B602-8CE1D53BD96A |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Deuterophlebia pachychaeta |
status |
sp. nov. |
Deuterophlebia pachychaeta sp. nov.
Description.
Male adults. Body length ca. 3.0 mm (n = 2), uniformly brownish black. Head brownish black, flattened and nearly trapezoidal, width ca. 0.50 mm (Fig. 6A View Figure 6 ). Head densely covered with microtrichia. Median clypeal lobe slightly convex, semicircle shaped with around 20 sharp setae (Fig. 6A View Figure 6 ). Mouthparts in form of an invaginated tubule, oral region depressed (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ). Edges of oral region (or mouth opening) ridged, forming a protruded angle on inner side of each eye (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ). Ventral ridge of oral region convex medially and forming a blunt mental tooth (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ). Postgena and oral region with microtrichia but more sparse than other regions, a pair of tentorial pits present on each side of oral region (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ). Compound eyes glabrous, width ca. 0.13 mm, distance between eyes ca. 0.30 mm (Fig. 6A View Figure 6 ).
Antennae ca. 13.0 mm (n=5) (Fig. 6A, C View Figure 6 ). Scape oval shaped, pedicel globular, both scape and pedicel covered with microtrichia (Fig. 6A, C View Figure 6 ). Flagella four segmented, flagellomeres I-III slender cylindrical, each with a subapical tubercle on front margin and bearing 8-10 digitiform setae (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ). Flagellomere IV flattened and elongated, with curved hair-like setae on the anterior side of basal half, apical half generally glabrous but bearing 4-5 clusters of curved hair-like setae, apex slightly expanded with some curved hair-like setae (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ). Antennal ratio ca. 4.0: 2.0: 5.0: 3.0: 3.0: 287.0, flagellomere IV about 17 × combined length of five basal antennal articles or about 4 × body length (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ).
Thorax brownish black, densely covered with microtrichia. Mesonotum strongly expanded. Wings ca. 5.5 mm, shape, venation and other features similar to D. pseudopoda sp. nov. (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
Legs brownish black, slender, three pairs sharing similar chaetotaxy exhibiting four types of setae: (1) microtrichia, densely covered on all segments; (2) sharp macrotrichia, sparsely on dorsal margin of femora and tibiae; (3) long capitate setae, on ventral side of tarsomere I-IV of each leg, distal half of ventral edge of all tibiae, surrounding the top of fore- and midtibiae, and also densely arranged radially on each empodium; (4) digitiform setae, 1-3 pairs for each tarsomere (Fig. 6D-F View Figure 6 ). In foreleg, femur: tibia: tarsus = 11.0: 17.0: 16.0; femur slightly flattened, tibia slender cylindrical and gradually broader apically; tarsomere I: II: III: IV: V = 8.5: 2.0: 2.0: 1.5: 0.8, tarsomeres I-IV cylindrical, tarsomere V conical; empodium shell-shaped, length subequal to tarsomere V; claw slender tapered, shorter than empodium (Fig. 2B View Figure 2 ) (Fig. 6D View Figure 6 ). Midleg shortest among all legs, features generally similar to foreleg, femur: tibia: tarsus = 10.0: 12.5: 14.0, tarsomere I: II: III: IV: V = 8.5: 2.0: 2.0: 1.5: 0.8 (Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ). In hindleg, femur: tibia: tarsus of hindleg = 14.0: 17.0: 11.0, tarsomere I: II: III: IV: V = 3.0: 2.0: 2.0: 1.5: 0.8 (Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ).
Abdomen brownish black, densely covered with microtrichia, nine segmented, tapering posteriorly. Segment VIII in form of a short chitin ring, sternite IX almost glabrous, connected with dorsal plate and gonocoxite (Fig. 6G View Figure 6 ). Gonocoxite with posterior projection ca. 1/2 length of gonostylus (Fig. 6G View Figure 6 ). Gonostylus subequal dorsal plate, flattened, slender oval shaped, flexor surface with numerous curved sharp setae (Fig. 6G View Figure 6 ). Dorsal plate parallel-sided, posterior margin slightly depressed with a median cleft and some stout setae on margin (Fig. 6G View Figure 6 ). Aedeagus in form of a smooth tube, length subequal to gonostylus, longer than dorsal plate (Fig. 6G View Figure 6 ).
Female adult. Body length ca. 2.3 mm (n = 1). Besides sexual differences, generally similar to the males except following features (Fig. 7A-D View Figure 7 ).
Head width ca. 0.40 mm (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Median clypeal lobe slightly convex with ca. 20 setae (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Oral region located near anterior margin of head, postgena and oral region with microtrichia but more sparse than other regions (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Compound eyes more prominent than males (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Antenna ca. 0.3 mm. Scape slender oval-shaped, pedicel globular, both scape and pedicel covered with microtrichia with several sharp setae (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Flagellomere I slender cylindrical, flagellomeres II-III slender oval shaped, flagellomere IV dripping shaped (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Flagellomeres I-IV bearing 2, 4, 10 and 2 digitiform setae apically respectively, flagellomere III-IV with 1 and 4 sharp setae respectively (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Antennal ratio = 7.0: 4.0: 10.0: 5.0: 5.0: 4.0 (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ).
Legs sharing similar chaetotaxy and exhibiting three types of setae, chaetotaxy similar to males but without capitate setae (Fig. 7B-D View Figure 7 ). In all legs, coxae about twice longer and broader than trochanters, femora slightly flattened, tibiae and tarsomeres slender cylindrical (Fig. 7B-D View Figure 7 ). In foreleg and midleg, femur: tibia: tarsus = 1.0: 2.0: 1.5, tarsomere I: II: III: IV: V = 1.2: 0.8: 0.8: 0.8: 2.4 (Fig. 7B, C View Figure 7 ). In hindleg, femur: tibia: tarsus = 1.0: 1.7: 1.1, tarsomere I: II: III: IV: V = 1.0: 0.8: 0.8: 0.8: 2.4 (Fig. 7D View Figure 7 ). Claws of all legs similar, paired, stout and curved, with a blunt protrusion in the middle (Fig. 7B-D View Figure 7 ). Empodium in form of a long and hairy spine, subequal to the length of claw (Fig. 7B-D View Figure 7 ).
Male pupae. Pupae flattened oval shaped, length 2.8 mm (n = 2), width 2.0 mm (Fig. 8A, B View Figure 8 ). Dorsal integument dark brown, divided into 11 segments (Fig. 8A, B View Figure 8 ).
Prothorax fused with mesothorax, forming a conical segment with a median suture (Fig. 8A, B View Figure 8 ). Mesothoracic lateral margins each with a pair of sharp spines and a gill (Figs 8A, B View Figure 8 , 9A, B View Figure 9 ). Spines ca. 0.4 mm, expanded basally, slightly curved, dark brown, originated from a round base (Fig. 9A View Figure 9 ). Ventral gills light to dark brown, length subequal to the dorsal spines, each including four filaments: posterior filament single and short, pointing backward; anterior three gill filaments on a common base, similar in shape, slender and twisted; second and third filaments fused at base (Fig. 9B View Figure 9 ). Metathorax completely surrounded by mesothorax and first abdominal segment (Fig. 8A, B View Figure 8 ).
Abdominal segment I and II similar, each with a pair of anterolateral projections, each projection pointing forward and bearing ca. 18 spines (Fig. 8A, B View Figure 8 ). Lateral margins of segments VI and VII with several spines on both dorsal and ventral sides. Segment VIII shield-shaped, surrounded by segments VII and IX (Fig. 8A, B View Figure 8 ).
Adult structures visible on ventral side (Fig. 8B View Figure 8 ). Head present below mesothorax; antennal sheaths in form of a large elliptic ring, surrounding body 2.0 times (Fig. 8B View Figure 8 ). Leg sacs extended to posterior end of antennal ring, strongly expanded apically. Abdominal segments III-V each with a pair of black adhesive discs (Fig. 8B View Figure 8 ).
Female pupae. Length ca. 2.8 mm (n = 1), width ca. 2.0 mm (Fig. 8C, D View Figure 8 ). Dorsal morphology similar to male except for smaller mesothorax (Fig. 8C, D View Figure 8 ). Gender can be identified through the absence of antennal ring, apex of female leg sheaths not expanded (Fig. 8C, D View Figure 8 ).
Material examined.
Holotype: male adult, China: Yunnan Province, Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture, Gongshan County, Dulongjiang Township , Dulongjiang River , 27°50'14.16"N, 98°19'54.2"E, 1470 m a.s.l., 4.II.2023, Xuhongyi Zheng leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 1 male adult, 2 male pupae, same locality and data as holotype GoogleMaps ; 1 female adult dissected from a pupa, Yunnan Province, Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture , Fugong County, 26°57'17.32"N, 98°52'3.04"E, 1265 m a.s.l., 3. VII. 2022, leg. Xuhongyi Zheng, Zhenxing Ma, Zhiteng Chen & Pengxu Mu. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis.
Male adults of Deuterophlebia pachychaeta sp. nov. can be identified by their head shape and chaetotaxy of antennae (Fig. 6A, C View Figure 6 ). Following the keys of Courtney (1994) and Zheng et al. (2022), males of this species, which are similar to D. mirabilis Edwards, 1922, D. blepharis Courtney, 1994 and D. sinensis Zheng et al., 2022, can be separated from other Asian species by their relatively long antennae (longer than 8.0 mm), and postgena covered with microtrichia (Fig. 6B View Figure 6 ). Chaetotaxy on flagellomeres can be used to differentiate those four similar species: in the new species, there were ca. 8-10 digitiform setae on each of flagellomeres I-III (Fig. 6A, C View Figure 6 ) ( Courtney 1990, 1994; Zheng et al. 2022).
Female adults of D. pachychaeta sp. nov. can be recognized through a combination of the smooth median clypeal lobe, chaetotaxy of antennae, and shape of flagella (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Its smooth and convex median clypeal lobe is similar to D. mirabilis Edwards, 1922, D. blepharis Courtney, 1994, D. sinensis Zheng et al., 2022, D. yunnanensis Zheng et al., 2022 and D. wuyiensis Zheng et al., 2022, but can be differentiated from them by its antenna: flagellomeres I-IV bearing ca. 2, 4, 10 and 2 digitiform setae respectively, flagellomere IV with additionally 4 sharp setae; antennal ratio = 7.0: 4.0: 10.0: 5.0: 5.0: 4.0 (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ) ( Courtney 1990, 1994; Zheng et al. 2022).
Pupae can be identified by their mesothoracic spines: there are two spines on each side, expanded basally (Fig. 9A, B View Figure 9 ). Compared with the 15 species with a clear pupal stage ( Courtney 1990, 1994; Zheng et al. 2022), only D. acutirhina Zheng et al., 2022 has similar basally expanded spines, but less expanded than in the new species. They can also be distinguished by the absence of abdominal dots ( Zheng et al. 2022).
Etymology.
The specific epithet " pachychaeta " is a combination of the words pachy and chaeta, which refers to its thickened spines on pupal mesothorax.
Distribution.
China (Yunnan Province).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |