Drepanomonas multidentata Foissner & Omar nov., 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4467/16890027AP.14.027.2022 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3B5C8786-CE6D-FFD3-F0B8-2BBDAD58FB34 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Drepanomonas multidentata Foissner & Omar nov. |
status |
nov. |
Drepanomonas multidentata Foissner & Omar nov.
spec. ( Figs 16–21 View Figs 16–24 , 25–40 View Figs 25–32 View Figs 33–40 ; Table 1)
Diagnosis: Size in vivo about 45 × 25 µm. Body crescentic with acute ends made by ground cortex. Three conspicuous spines in mid-body: one right and anterior of oral opening, two on a convexity at level and posterior of oral opening. Right side with an elevated obfalcate plate between kineties 2 and 3; ridge associated with kinety 3 ends in a subapical spine. Left side with a ridge each along kineties 5 and 6 both forming a spine anteriorly and a tridentate pattern posteriorly. Somatic kinety 4 commences with a dikinetid followed by six monokinetids; kineties 6 and 7 only partially ciliated. On average a total of 107 basal bodies. Extrusomes absent.
Type locality: Slightly saline surface mud and soil from temporary grassland puddles in the surroundings of the village of Chichiriviche, Maracay National Park, about 13 km inshore from the north coast of Venezuela, 11°33′N, 67°13′W GoogleMaps .
Type material: One holotype slide with protargol-impregnated specimens and five paratype slides with protargol-impregnated and Klein-Foissner silver nitrate-impregnated specimens have been deposited in the Biology Centre of the Museum of Upper Austria, Linz (LI). The holotype and important paratype specimens have been marked by black ink circles on the coverslip .
Etymology: the species name is a composite of the Latin prefix multi (many) and the Latin adjective dentata (toothed), referring to the multitude of body teeth.
Description: Depending on method, body size varies considerably ( Table 1): in vivo about 47 × 27 µm (n = 4), in Klein-Foissner silver nitrate preparations 43 × 25 µm, while cells shrank to 35.5 × 16.8 µm in protargol slides. Taking into account the in vivo measurements and 5% shrinkage in the silver nitrate preparations, we obtain an in vivo size of 40–50 × 20–30 µm, on average about 45 × 25 µm, corresponding to a length: width ratio of 1.9, which matches values obtained from 17 specimens photographed alive ( Figs 25–27, 29–36 View Figs 25–32 View Figs 33–40 ); protargol-impregnated cells have a ratio of 2.1 and are thus slightly more slender ( Table 1; Figs 37, 38 View Figs 33–40 ).
Body crescentic with acute ends and several ventral and lateral spines; laterally only slightly flattened, except for thin dorsal margin; when observed ventrally or dorsally, slenderly elliptical with left side slightly more convex than right side ( Table 1; Figs 16–20 View Figs 16–24 , 25, 30 View Figs 25–32 , 36, 39 View Figs 33–40 ).
Nuclear apparatus in or near mid-body. Macronucleus globular to broadly ellipsoidal, contains some globular masses, probably nucleoli up to 2 µm across. Micronucleus globular, near or attached to ventral side of macronucleus ( Table 1; Figs 16, 19 View Figs 16–24 , 30 View Figs 25–32 , 37 View Figs 33–40 ). Contractile vacuole in third quarter of body, slightly posterior and dorsal of buccal cavity, with distinct tube extending into buccal cavity posterior to adoral membranelles ( Table 1; and 7–9 shortened anteriorly and/or posteriorly. Kineties 1–4 on right side; kineties 5–7 on left side; and kineties 1, 2 and 6–9 on ventral side ( Table 1; Figs 16–20 View Figs 16–24 , 37–40 View Figs 33–40 ).
Oral apparatus in mid-body ( Table 1; Figs 16, 18, 20 View Figs 16–24 , 31 View Figs 25–32 , 37, 39 View Figs 33–40 ). Buccal cavity deep contains two or three adoral membranelles. Membranelle 1 distinctly smaller than membranelles 2 and 3, recognizable only in dividers ( Fig. 21 View Figs 16–24 ); membranelles 2 and 3 obliquely arranged to main body axis and so close together that details cannot be recognized. Nasse kinetosomes anterior to adoral membranelles ( Figs 20 View Figs 16–24 , 39 View Figs 33–40 ); oral basket not recognizable.
Occurrence and ecology: As yet found only at type locality (see above). It grew well in a raw culture with tap water to which were added three squashed wheat grains and a few ml of the soil eluate from the non-flooded Petri dish culture.
Comparison of Drepanomonas multidentata with similar species: Using the species characteristics for Drepanomonas suggested by Omar and Foissner (2013), D. multidentata is unique by the three ventrolateral spines, the tridentate spine pattern in the posterior half of the left side, and the absence of extrusomes. Similar species are D. dentata Fresenius, 1858 , D. lunaris Foissner, 1979 , and D. obtusa Penard, 1922 , all having extrusomes. Further, D. dentata differs from D. multidentata not only by the spine pattern but also by body size (~ 80 µm vs. 45 × 25) and the serrate (vs. smooth) ventral and dorsal margin ( Kreutz 1998; cp. Figs 22–24 View Figs 16–24 with Figs 16, 17 View Figs 16–24 ). Drepanomonas lunaris and D. obtusa differ from D. multidentata not only by the spine pattern but also by the rounded and truncated (vs. acute) posterior body end, respectively.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |