Coprophanaeus, Olsoufieff, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5352924 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A7F7B2C-7F55-8854-FF34-FC3324DEEEF5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Coprophanaeus |
status |
s. str. |
Subgenus Coprophanaeus View in CoL s. str. Olsoufieff, 1924
Coprophanaeus Olsoufieff, 1924: 22 View in CoL . Type Species: Scarabaeus jasius Olivier View in CoL , original designation.
Diagnosis. General – Lower portion of eye large, width greater than twice (usually about three times or more) that of oculogular space. Paraocular areas (genae) not carinate lateral to eyes. Occipital areas of parietals more-or-less flattened, lacking angulate prominence ( Fig. 12 View Figure 5-12 ). Circumnotal ridge entire or broken behind eyes ( Fig. 7-8 View Figure 5-12 ). Pronotal sculpturing variable, usually granulorugose anterolaterally, punctate to some degree posteromedially; basal fossae variable. Pronotum lacking posterolateral ridge. Striae fine, simple or carinulate. Posterior edge of hind wing strongly notched basally ( Fig. 9 View Figure 5-12 ). Posterior surface of each protibial tooth with single basal row of long setae ( Fig. 6 View Figure 5-12 ). Abdominal sterna usually smooth medially. Sexual dimorphism marked.
Male – Head bearing lamellate process of some sort or trituberculate carina, never a simple curved horn. Pronotum variable, flattened or transversely concave anteromedially, with strong median prominence. Parameres variable.
Female – Head with trituberculate carina, sometimes strongly raised. Protarsi absent. Pronotum variable, usually with transverse process near anterior margin followed by oval concavity.
Distribution. Neotropical region.
Comments. This subgenus embraces 29 species distributed in four species groups separated in the key below. Edmonds (1972) divided the subgenus into two species groups (jasius and dardanus); only the jasius group is maintained here as defined then. Our organization of this subgenus is different from that presented by Arnaud (2002c), but many of the subgroups of closely related species (Arnaud’s complexes) are the same. Keys to species appear under the treatments of each species group.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Coprophanaeus
Edmonds, W. D. & Zidek, J. 2010 |
Coprophanaeus
Olsoufieff, G. 1924: 22 |