Cryptophyllium drunganum (Yang, 1995) Cumming & Bank & Bresseel & Constant & Tirant & Dong & Sonet & Bradler, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1018.61033 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7E9360A5-A359-437A-91C0-04C74B1FE9D6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/37ECB48A-D860-50F7-AB81-4CAADB108F15 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cryptophyllium drunganum (Yang, 1995) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Cryptophyllium drunganum (Yang, 1995) View in CoL comb. nov. Figures 28 View Figure 28 , 29 View Figure 29
Material examined.
We examined the holotype female from within the Beijing Agricultural University from detailed photographs taken by Yu-Chen Zheng (China Agricultural University, China). Additionally, we examined a tentatively identified male from "Yunnan China: Qinglangdang, Dulongjiang Township, Gongshan County, Nujiang Prefecture, II-2016, Local" (Coll ZD).A tentative male specimen collected very near the type locality was used in our molecular analysis, which cannot be confidently confirmed as Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. due to extreme sexual dimorphism of the phylliids and lack of a fresh tissue sample from a true Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. female (Fig. 29 View Figure 29 ).
Remarks.
This species is only known at present from the morphologically unique holotype female from northern Yunnan Province (Fig. 28 View Figure 28 ). However, this area is not known for a high diversity of species, so we are fairly confident that this male represents the undescribed Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. male. Also, this male specimen was molecularly recovered as distinct to the other species described from China as we have successfully sampled almost all species of Cryptophyllium gen. nov. and included them in our molecular phylogeny (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ).
Differentiation.
Females are morphologically similar to Cryptophyllium tibetense comb. nov. and Cryptophyllium liyananae sp. nov. due to the long alae, rounded exterior profemoral lobe, mesopleura which are distinctly reaching the anterior margin but slightly curved on the anterior end (not perfectly straight margined), boxy abdomen with a notable bend on abdominal segment VII, and the presence of small exterior lobes on all tibiae. Both of these species can be differentiated by the length of the subgenital plate as in Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. it is short, just passing the anterior margin on the tenth abdominal segment, and in the other species it is at least three quarters of the length of the tenth abdominal segment (in Cryptophyllium liyananae sp. nov.) or even longer and exceeding the tip of the abdomen (in Cryptophyllium tibetense comb. nov.).
Our male specimen is morphologically similar to Cryptophyllium tibetense comb. nov. and Cryptophyllium yunnanense comb. nov. due to the shape of the profemoral exterior lobe which smoothly arcs end to end without a distinct bend, the exterior profemoral lobe that is the same width or slightly thinner than the interior lobe (not wider as is common in many of the Cryptophyllium gen. nov. species), tegmina which are long reaching the anterior margin of abdominal segment IV or slightly passing it, a similar spade-shaped abdomen, and prominent tubercles on the mesopleura.
Cryptophyllium tibetense comb. nov. males additionally have small exterior tibial lobes on the distal ends like are present in our Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. male. Our male Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. can however be differentiated from Cryptophyllium tibetense comb. nov. by the presence of eight or nine small serrate teeth present throughout the full length of the profemoral exterior lobe vs. Cryptophyllium tibetense comb. nov. males which only have two or three small teeth on the distal end only. Additionally, the mesofemoral exterior lobe also can differentiate these species as it is distinctly angled in our Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. male and smoothly arcing without a distinct bend in Cryptophyllium tibetense comb. nov. males.
Cryptophyllium yunnanense comb. nov. can be differentiated by the absence of exterior tibial lobes and the lack of a distinctly serrate exterior profemoral lobe margin, with Cryptophyllium yunnanense comb. nov. only having two or three small teeth vs. our male Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. which has eight or nine small serrate teeth present throughout the full length of the profemoral exterior lobe.
Distribution.
At present only known from northern Yunnan Province, from the type locality of Nujian Lisu Autonomous Prefecture, Gongshan County (Drung-Nu), and our tentative male Cryptophyllium drunganum comb. nov. from Du Longjiang Township, Qing Lang Dang in the same prefecture.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |