Crinum defiXum Ker Gawl., J. Sci. Arts
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24823/EJB.2022.1911 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3725A61D-FFFA-FF8B-3516-644539F1F9A1 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Crinum defiXum Ker Gawl., J. Sci. Arts |
| status |
|
Crinum defiXum Ker Gawl., J. Sci. Arts View in CoL (London) 3: 105 (1817). – Type: [unpublished illustration] Icones Roxburghianae 1395 (lectotype K, designated by Turner, Ann. Bot. Fenn. 58: 202 [2021]).
Crinum roxburghii Dalzell in Dalzell & Gibson, Bombay Fl. 275 (1861). – Type: [unpublished illustration] Icones Roxburghianae 1395 (lectotype K, designated here).
Dalzell realised that what Roxburgh described under the name Crinum asiaticum was not the true plant. He proposed Crinum roxburghii for Roxburgh’s crinum, but Ker Gawler has already named it Crinum defixum . However, Ker Gawler had included elements other than Roxburgh’s in his protologue, so Dalzell’s name is not superfluous.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Crinum defiXum Ker Gawl., J. Sci. Arts
| Turner, Ian M. 2022 |
Crinum defiXum
| Crinum defiXum Ker Gawl. 1817: 105 |