Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5470.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6A4270C2-D3F9-404F-91E7-4A73F2A99AE4 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/36508782-FFE6-DB07-3288-71370F06FCDD |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) |
| status |
|
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) View in CoL
Figs 2K View FIGURE 2 , 4I View FIGURE4 , 15A–D View FIGURE 15
Fusus semirugosus Bell. et Micht. View in CoL —Hörnes 1853: 294, pl. 32, figs 8–10 [non Angustifusus semirugosus ( Bellardi & Michelotti,
1840)]. Fusus semirugosus View in CoL —Quenstedt 1884: 601, pl. 209, fig. 16 [non Angustifusus semirugosus ( Bellardi & Michelotti, 1840) View in CoL ].? Fusus grallifer n. f.— Handmann 1882: 260.? [ Fusus View in CoL ] grallifer Handm. — Handmann 1888: 18 * Fusus Vindobonensis View in CoL nob.—Hoernes & Auinger 1890: 252, pl. 31, figs 10a–b. F [usus]. vindobonensis View in CoL — Cossmann 1901: 12. Fusus vindobonensis Hö. Au. View in CoL — Boettger 1902: 36. Fusus vindobonensis Hö. Au. View in CoL — Boettger 1906: 48. Fusus Vindobonensis Hörn. et Auing. View in CoL — Schaffer 1908: 108, pl. 2, fig. 9. Fusus (Fusus) vindobonensis R. Hörn. & Auing. View in CoL — Sieber 1937: 139. Fusus hössi Partsch, 1837 — Moisescu 1955: 157, pl. 13, figs 15, 16 [non Angustifusus hoessii ( Naumann, 1852) View in CoL ]. Fusus vindobonensis Hoernes et Auinger View in CoL — Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 411, pl. 3, figs 5–6. F [usus]. (F [usinus].) vindobonensis R. Hörn View in CoL , et Au.— Sieber 1958: 152. Fusus (Fusus) vindobonensis Hoernes und Auinger 1890 View in CoL —Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960: 190, pl. 46,
figs 5a–b. Fusus (s. s.) vindobonensis Hoernes et Auinger, 1890 — Glibert 1963: 146. Fusus vindobonensis Hoernes & Auinger, 1891 — Strausz 1966: 341, pl. 26, figs 11–12. Fusus (Fusus) vindobonensis Hoernes et Auinger — Stancu & Andreescu 1968: 464, pl. 5, fig. 57.
Fusinus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) — Bałuk 1995: 246, pl. 35, fig. 8.
Fusinus (Fusinus) vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger) — Schultz 1998: 68, pl. 27, fig. 10.
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) View in CoL — Vermeij & Snyder 2018: 71, figs 19a–c.
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes et Auinger, 1890) View in CoL — Kovács 2022: 77, figs 39–40.
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes et Auinger, 1890) View in CoL — Kovács & Vicián 2023: 233, figs 6A–B.
Type material. Lectotype (designated herein) NHMW 1846 View Materials /0037/0262a, SL: 54.6 mm, MD: 13.5 mm, Baden ( Austria), illustrated in Hörnes (1853: pl. 32, fig. 8), Figs 4I View FIGURE4 , 15B View FIGURE 15 1 –B View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . Paralectotypes: NHMW 1846 View Materials /0037/0262b, SL: 47.7 mm , MD: 13.6 mm, Baden ( Austria), illustrated in Hörnes (1853: pl. 32, fig. 9) . NHMW 1846 View Materials /0037/0262c, SL: 41.9 mm , MD: 11.9 mm, Baden ( Austria), illustrated in Hörnes (1853: pl. 32, fig. 10) .
Illustrated material. NHMW 1870/0033/0101, SL: 83.8 mm, MD: 22.0 mm, Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania), Figs 15A View FIGURE 15 1 –A View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . NHMW 2023/0350/0007, SL: 51.6 mm, MD: 13.8 mm, Bad Vöslau ( Austria), illustrated in Schultz (1998: pl. 27, fig. 10), Figs 15C View FIGURE 15 1 –C View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . NHMW 2023/0350/0008, SL: 55.4 mm, MD: 14.5 mm, Bad Vöslau ( Austria), Fig. 15D View FIGURE 15 . NHMW 2023/0338/0020, SL: 40.8 mm, MD: 10.0 mm, Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania), Fig. 2K View FIGURE 2 .
Additional material. 1 spec., NHMW 1859 View Materials /0019/0092, SL: 26.1 mm, MD: 7.9 mm, Porzteich at Břeclav ( Czech Republic) , illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1890: pl. 31, fig. 10). 1 spec., NHMW 1857 View Materials /0028/0025, Grund ( Austria) ; 15 spec., NHMW 1846 View Materials /0037/0262, Baden ( Austria) ; 11 spec., NHMW 1859 View Materials /0027/0089, Bad Vöslau ( Austria) ; 1 spec., NHMW 1937 View Materials /0002/0291, Bad Vöslau ( Austria) , illustrated in Schaffer (1908: pl. 2, fig. 9); 3 spec., NHMW 1862 View Materials /0029/0036, Rudice ( Czech Republic) ; 6 spec., NHMW 1870 View Materials /0033/0101a, Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania) ; 33 spec., NHMW 1860 View Materials /0040/0170, Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania) ; 3 spec., NHMW 1867 View Materials /0019/0117, CoŞteiu de Sus ( Romania) .
Revised description. Medium-sized, very slender fusiform shell of up to ten teleoconch whorls; apical angle ~30–32°. Protoconch very high conical of 2.5 weakly convex whorls, diameter 800 μm, height 1150 μm. Last two protoconch whorls with orthocline to opisthocyrt axial riblets. Transition to teleoconch marked by onset of spiral sculpture consisting of three weak primary spiral cord plus weaker subsutural cord. Early teleoconch whorls convex with shoulder placed below mid-whorl. Later whorls with broad subsutural ramp and narrow subsutural collar, prominent, widely spaced axial ribs, separated by much wider interspaces, adapically weakening over subsutural ramp; ramp initially with two faint spiral cords, fading around sixth teleoconch whorl; three very prominent spiral cords along periphery, a fourth appearing above abapical suture on third teleoconch whorl. Spiral cords weakening on late spire whorls, obsolete on penultimate to last whorl. Simultaneously, whorl profile changing from shouldered to convex. Suture deeply incised. Last whorl attaining 65% of total height, weakly shouldered or regularly convex, smooth subsutural area and mid-whorl; base strongly constricted, bearing alternating primary and secondary cords, weakening over siphonal canal. Aperture narrow, elongate pyriform. Columellar callus strongly thickened, forming narrow rim, sharply delimited from base. Fasciole indistinct. Columella hardly excavated, smooth, weakly twisted at transition to siphonal canal. Anal canal not developed. Outer lip thin with weak lirae extending deep within aperture. Siphonal canal extraordinarily long, narrow, straight.
Paratethyan synonyms. Fusus grallifer Handmann, 1882 was based on a specimen from Baden-Sooss ( Austria (SL: c. 42 mm, MD: 10 mm). The specimen was described as “ elongate, fusiform; with short, rounded whorls, scalariform, close to the adapical suture, the ribs long transversed by thick and thin stripes, ribs and striae disappearing on last whorl; base narrowed, slightly striated, siphonal canal very straight, very long; aperture subcircular ” ( Handmann 1882: 260, translated from Latin). Handmann (1882) emphasized the similarity with ‘ Fusus semirugosus’ sensu Hörnes (1853) . Fusus grallifer Handmann, 1882 would predate Fusus vindobonensis Hoernes & Auinger, 1890 . The former ‘Rudolf Handmann collection’ is stored in the Kollegium Kalksburg in Vienna, a Catholic private school, but the type is lost, and it remains unclear if Fusus grallifer is really conspecific with Angustifusus vindobonensis . We therefore consider Fusus grallifer a nomen inquirendum and give priority to Hoernes & Auinger’s name.
Discussion. Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) co-occurs with Angustifusus hoessii ( Naumann, 1852) , which differs in its broader shell and less shouldered spire whorls. Angustifusus vindobonensis lacks all the fine secondary spirals seen in A. hoessii that persist along entire surface. Angustifusus vindobonensis was confused by Hörnes (1853) with Angustifusus semirugosus ( Bellardi & Michelotti, 1840) , from the Burdigalian and Langhian of the Colli Torinesi ( Italy). The Italian species, however, is less slender and has a lower spire (see Bellardi 1873: pl. 9, fig. 5).
Paleoenvironment. Occurrences in the Baden Formation of the Vienna Basin suggest middle to outer neritic environments in up to 250 m water depth ( Kranner et al. 2021).
Distribution in Central Paratethys. Badenian (Middle Miocene): Korytnica Basin: Korytnica ( Poland) ( Bałuk 1995); Vienna Basin: Baden, Bad Vöslau, Baden-Sooss ( Austria) (Hoernes & Auinger 1890); Pannonian Basin: Letkés ( Hungary) ( Strausz 1966); Făget Basin: Buituri, Lăpugiu de Sus, CoŞteiu de Sus, NemeŞeŞti ( Romania) (Hoernes & Auinger 1890; Moisescu 1955); Dacian Basin: Opanec, Staropatica, Târnene ( Bulgaria) (Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960).
Genus Ariefusus Vermeij & Snyder, 2018
Type species. Fusus rutilus Nicolay & G. Berthelot, 1996 ; original designation by Vermeij & Snyder (2018: 67). Present day, Western Africa.
Diagnosis. “ Shell elongate fusiform (length to diameter ratio 2.4: 3.1) with a long straight tapering siphonal canal (canal length to shell length ratio 0.30: 0.41) that is very narrowly open (less than 2 mm); axial sculpture consisting of very high, sharply rounded ribs forming axially elongate nodes at periphery; spiral sculpture consisting of fine cords not expanded into nodules where crossing ribs below periphery and not roughened by growth lines; aperture small, ovate, adapically rounded; outer lip edge abapically slightly convex; inner side of outer lip with smooth lirae; inner lip adherent, its adapical end with obsolete parietal ridge.” ( Vermeij & Snyder 2018: 67).
| MD |
Museum Donaueschingen |
| NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890)
| Harzhauser, Mathias, Landau, Bernard M. & Vermeij, Geerat J. 2024 |
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes et Auinger, 1890)
| Kovacs, Z. & Vician, Z. 2023: 233 |
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes et Auinger, 1890)
| Kovacs, Z. 2022: 77 |
Angustifusus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890)
| Vermeij, G. & Snyder, M. A. 2018: 71 |
Fusinus (Fusinus) vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger)
| Schultz, O. 1998: 68 |
Fusinus vindobonensis (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890)
| Baluk, W. 1995: 246 |