Wroughtonia robustifemur Long, 2024
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5446.2.4 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:582B049F-FD5A-483A-A212-D63869125E32 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11104804 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/335D879D-543F-D369-FBA4-57344BD9315E |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Wroughtonia robustifemur Long |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Wroughtonia robustifemur Long , sp. nov.
Figures 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 , 5 View FIGURE 5
Type material. Holotype, ♀, “Hel. 096 ” ( IEBR), NW Vietnam: Lai Chau, Sin Ho, Sa De Phin , forest, 22°18’18’’N 103°13’37’’E, 1760 m, light trap, 31.v.2022, PT Nhi. GoogleMaps
Diagnostic characters. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres, 9 th –14 th flagellomeres cream white; frontal protuberance lamelliform, acute dorsally ( Figs 4B, C View FIGURE 4 ); in dorsal view width of head 1.75 × its median length; height of eye 2.2 × temple; in frontal view height of eye 1.9 × its transverse width; width of face 1.65 × length of face and clypeus combined; malar space 1.3 × height of eye; in lateral view height of eye 1.5 × as long as transverse width; transverse width of eye 1.6 × temple. Mesosoma 1.9 × longer than high; in lateral view, mesoscutum perpendicularly raised above pronotum; notauli deep, sparsely crenulate anteriorly, fused posteriorly with two rugosities forming one median carina close to scutellar sulcus; scutellar sulcus 0.6 × scutellum; propodeum with medio-basal carina and elongate areola ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ). Length of fore wing 2.9 × its maximum width; vein 3-SR 1.2 × r; vein 2-M 2.0 × 3-SR; hind wing vein 1-M 2.1 × 1r-m; vein 2-SC+R vertical. Fore tarsus 1.4 × as long as fore tibia; hind femur robust, with ventral serrations and without tooth-shaped protuberance ( Fig. 4K View FIGURE 4 ); length of hind femur (without tooth or serrations) 3.2 × as long as its maximum width; hind coxa smooth laterally, with sparse fine punctures and short sparse setae. First metasomal tergite slightly widened apically, 1.2 × longer than its apical width; dorsal carinae in basal 0.5 of tergite; first tergite areolate-rugulose medially; median length of second tergite 0.4 × its apical width ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ); second tergite largely punctate, 0.8 × as long as third tergite; first tergite areolate-rugulose; second tergite punctate-reticulate medially, smooth laterally and apically; the remaining tergites shiny, smooth.
Notes. W. robustifemur sp. nov. is similar to W. simulata Long, 2020 , but differs from the latter by the following characters: 1) in lateral view, mesoscutum vertically elevated above pronotum ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4F View FIGURE 4 ) (mesoscutum roundly elevated above pronotum in W. simulata ); 2) dorsal carinae of first tergite in basal 0.5 of the tergite ( vs 0.8 of the tergite); and 3) propodeum yellow entirely ( vs propodeum black in W. simulata ).
W. robustifemur sp. nov. runs out to couplet 11a of the key by Long et al. (2020) as follows:
11a. Frontal protuberance lamelliform, not pointed apically; propodeum areolate-rugose, without areola (11a); second submarginal cell of fore wing trapezium-shaped, narrow (11 aa); vein r of fore wing exiting from middle of pterostigma; vein 3-SR 0.9 × r (11 aa) (see Fig. 102 in Long et al. 2020); vein 1-M of hind wing 0.4 × as long as vein 1r-m....... W. simulata Long, 2020
11a’. Frontal protuberance lamelliform, pointed apically ( Figs 4B, C View FIGURE 4 ); propodeum with areola (11b); second submarginal cell of fore wing trapezium-shaped, broad (11 bb); vein r exiting from before middle of pterostigma; vein 3-SR 1.2 × r (11 bb); vein 1-M of hind wing 2.1 × as long as vein 1r-m ( Fig. 4J View FIGURE 4 ).................................... W. robustifemur Long , sp. nov.
Description. Holotype, ♀, body length 5.6 mm, fore wing length 5.0 mm, ovipositor sheath 2.8 mm ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15 × longer than second flagellomere; in frontal view height of eye 1.9 × its transverse width; width of face 1.65 × length of face and clypeus combined; malar space 1.3 × as long as mandible width and 0.5 × height of eye ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ); maxillary palp 1.4 × as long as head; frontal protuberance lamelliform, simple and acute ( Figs 4B, C View FIGURE 4 ); in dorsal view width of head 1.75 × its median length; height of eye 2.2 × temple; ocelli small, OOL: OD: POL = 12: 5: 7; distance between front and hind ocelli, 0.3 × OOL ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ); in lateral view height of eye 1.5 × its transverse width; transverse width of eye 1.6 × temple ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ); face coarsely rugose, with parallel crenulate grooves from antennal sockets to clypeal suture ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ); clypeus rugose; frons, vertex and temple smooth.
Mesosoma . Mesosoma 1.9 × longer than high; mesoscutum perpendicularly raised above pronotum ( Fig. 4F View FIGURE 4 ); pronotal side coarsely carinate-rugose medially; largely rugose ventrally and dorsally; mesopleuron smooth medially, with reticulate punctures dorsally, largely rugo-punctate ventrally and posterioly; metapleuron areolate-rugose; median lobe of mesoscutum coriaceous medio-anteriorly, areolate-rugulose laterally and posteriorly; lateral lobes of mesoscutum coriaceous to rugulose; notauli wide, largely rugose, fusing posteriorly with one rugosity in median transverse rugose area of mesoscutum ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ); scutellar sulcus smooth, with one carinae, 0.6 × as long as scutellum; scutellum largely rugose; propodeum areolate-rugulose, with medio-basal carina and elongate areola, areola with sparse transverse rugosities posteriorly ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ).
Wings. Length of fore wing 2.9 × its maximum width; pterostigma 2.6 × as long as wide ( Fig. 4I View FIGURE 4 ); vein r exiting before middle of pterostigma; vein 3-SR 1.2 × r; r: 2-SR: 3-SR: SR1: r-m = 10: 14: 12: 60: 13; 1-CU1: cu-a: 2-CU1 = 3: 8: 20; second submarginal cell trapezium-shaped, vein 2-M 2.0 × 3-SR ( Fig. 4I View FIGURE 4 ); hind wing vein 1-M 2.1 × as long as vein 1r-m; vein 2-SC+R vertical ( Fig. 4J View FIGURE 4 ); hind wing with 3 hamuli.
Legs. Fore tarsus 1.4 × longer than fore tibia; hind femur robust, with ventral serrations and stout tooth-shaped protuberance ( Fig. 4K View FIGURE 4 ); length of hind femur (without tooth or serrations), tibia and basitarsus 3.2, 7.7 and 6.0 × as long as their maximum width, respectively; hind coxa smooth laterally, with sparse fine punctures and short sparse setae; hind femur largely rugose-punctate laterally, rather densely setose ventrally ( Fig. 4K View FIGURE 4 ); hind tibial spurs short and robust; hind basitarsus 0.35 × as long as hind tibia, and 0.8 × as long as second–fifth hind tarsus; fourth hind tarsus short, 0.4 × telotarsus.
Metasoma. Metasoma 0.65 × as long as head and mesosoma combined; first tergite slightly widened apically, 1.2 × longer than its apical width; dorsal carinae in basal 0.5 of tergite ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ); first tergite areolate-rugulose ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ); median length of second tergite 0.4 × its apical width, and 0.8 × third tergite; second suture weakly indicated, smooth ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ); second tergite punctate-reticulate medially, smooth laterally and apically; remaining tergites smooth; ovipositor sheath 0.6 × as long as fore wing.
Colour. Head black; scapus and pedicel yellow; flagellum brown, except and two basal flagellomeres yellow and 9 th –14 nd flagellomeres cream white; first-second segments of palpi yellowish brown, the remaining segments yellow; mesonotum brown; propleuron and mesopleuron pale brown; metapleuron and propodeum yellow; fore and middle legs yellow; hind coxa yellow, pale brown infuscate dorso-laterally; trochanter and trochantellus yellow; hind femur brown; tibia pale yellow in basal one third, brown apical two third; first–third hind tarsus whitish-yellow; fourth-fifth tarsus brown; pterostigma and wing veins brown; wing membrane hyaline; first metasomal tergite yellow; second–sixth tergites pale brown; ovipositor sheath brown; ovipositor yellow.
Male: Unknown.
Etymology. “robustus” Latin for “hard, strong”, in reference to the robust hind femur.
Host. Unknown.
Distribution. Northwestern Vietnam ( Lai Chau province) ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |