Onychotrechus jaechi, Zettel, Herbert & Duc, Tran Anh, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.176609 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6241524 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/317D456E-0543-FF83-DCC3-FC4BC555BEB7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Onychotrechus jaechi |
status |
|
Description of Onychotrechus jaechi View in CoL sp.n.
( Figs. 1–5, 7, 8, 10 View FIGURES 1 – 3 View FIGURES 4 – 11 )
Material examined. Holotype (apterous male), " BHUTAN: Sarpang Prov.\ Geylephug – Shempang rd.\ 10km NNE Geylephug, 400m \ 26°56’43”N 90°31’29”E \ 26.11.2005, leg. M. Jäch (29)", in the Natural History Museum Vienna.
Type locality. Bhutan, Sarpang Province, along road between Geylephug and Shempang, ca. 10 km NNE Geylephug, 26°56’43”N 90°31’29”E, alt. ca. 400 m a.s.l., creek with large rock boulders in forested area ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ).
Description of holotype. Size: apterous male, length 3.72, width 1.17.
Colour. Body dorsally ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) mainly blackish brown with yellow markings. Head with median longitudinal stripe and anterior part yellow except along midline. Pronotum with two broad yellow sublateral stripes and thin median stripe. Mesonotum with two sublateral stripes, median stripe not distinct. Dorsum of abdomen totally brown. Antennal and leg segments mainly dark yellow. Fore femur ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ) with one broad dark brown stripe on exterior side and one slender, shorter brown stripe on extensor side. Venter yellow, mesosternum with paired black patches behind fore coxae and with the most posterior region black.
Structural characteristics. Head width 0.98, interocular width 0.51, eye size (length, dorsal view) 0.52. Lengths of antennal segments ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ): 1.21: 1.13: 1.11: 1.56, first segment with three long spines on distal part. Head length 0.90, pronotum length 0.59, mesonotum length 1.24. Lengths of meso- and metasterna (in ventral view of specimen!), 1.75: 0.12. Mesosternum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) strongly modified, with medial, posteriorly widened depression in posterior half and with strong transverse swelling at hind margin; depression with black setae directed to its centre; swelling with densely set, long, stout, black, posterodorsad directed setae covering base of metasternum. Metasternum ca. 0.21 long (median length in perpendicular view!), oriented almost vertically, forming a step between mesosternum and base of abdomen ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Lengths of leg segments (femur: tibia: tarsal segment 1: tarsal segment 2): fore leg: 1.43: 1.19: 0.13: 0.27; middle leg: 4.61: 3.27: 0.19: 0.43; hind leg: 4.39: 3.14: 0.19: 0.38. Fore femur ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ) incrassate basally and tapering towards apex, width of fore femur 0.31; fore tibia ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ) strongly curved, basal part with patch of long hairs on flexor side. Middle and hind femora slender and longer than body length ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ); spines on middle femur scattered and not distinct. Middle and hind claws similar to each other, subequal to first tarsal segment, length of each: 0.17. Abdomen ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) very short, length of sterna 2–7 combined: 0.57; ventrally caudal opening of segment 7 fully exposed (after dissection of segment 8 and genitalia) and occupying three-fourths of that length. Abdominal sterna 2–6 visible as very narrow transverse strips, each of about 0.03 in length, all without median groove. Ventral length of abdominal segment 8: 0.30. Pygophore small, sub-oval; proctiger ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ) short, apex with obtuse angle; paramere ( Figs. 7, 8 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ) short, simple; endosoma structures as in Figure 10 View FIGURES 4 – 11 .
Etymology. This species is named in honour of Dr. Manfred A. Jäch (Natural History Museum Vienna) who discovered this interesting species.
Remarks. Onychotrechus jaechi sp.n. is closely related to O. robustus described from northwestern India ( Andersen 1980) and recently also collected in Nepal (Assess-HKH, unpublished data). Males of both species have a basally incrassate fore femur (with distinct dark stripes; Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 , 4 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ), a patch of long hairs on the basal part of the flexor side of the fore tibia ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ), a mesosternal impression ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ), a short abdomen ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ), and a long hind coxa ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). However, the male of the new species can be easily separated from O. robustus by the following characteristics: The fore tibia is strongly curved ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ; only basally curved in O. robustus ). The middle femur has small, less erect spines (middle femur of O. robustus with long, erect spines set in a distinct row). The posterior swelling of the mesosternum bears long black setae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ; absent in O. robustus ). The median groove of the mesosternum has long, black setae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ; short black pegs in O. robustus ). The metasternum is oriented almost vertically ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ; horizontally in O. robustus ). The proctiger is short and has an obtuse apex (long and slender, with more acute apex in O. robustus ; comp. Figs. 5 and 6 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ). The apex of the paramere is strongly curved mediad (flat and club-shaped in O. robustus ; comp. Figs. 7–9 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ). The dorsal sclerite of the endosoma is basally strongly curved (slanted in O. robustus ; comp. Figs. 10 and 11 View FIGURES 4 – 11 ). The female of O. jaechi sp.n. is so far unknown. The pattern of black stripes is much more extended in O. jaechi sp.n. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) than described for O. robustus by Andersen (1980), but we have seen new specimens of O. robustus from India which are relatively dark in colour and not much different from O. jaechi sp.n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |