Omalus, Panzer, 1801
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5297.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:93FD168A-6CB8-4457-8F99-9E4A0507B3CF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7991825 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/311C87D0-2E13-9D52-FF53-F924BBE0F8DC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Omalus |
status |
s. str. |
Subgenus Omalus s. str.
auratus group
Omalus (Omalus) auratus ( Linnaeus, 1758)
= O. auratus anthracinus (du Buysson, 1892)
= O. contrarius ( Mader, 1939) [invalid name]
= O. auratus cupratus ( Mocsáry, 1889)
= O. curtiventris ( Tournier, 1879)
= O. auratus indigoteus (du Buysson, 1892)
= O. auratus maculatus (du Buysson, 1892)
= O. minimus ( Dufour & Perris, 1840)
= O. obscurus ( Tournier, 1889)
= O. testaceicornis (du Buysson, 1892)
= Omalus auratus viridiventris ( Mocsáry, 1890)
Omalus auratus nigridorsus ( Tsuneki, 1953)
Omalus triangulifer Abeille de Perrin, 1877
Omalus tshingiz (Semenov-Tian-Shanskij in Semenov-Tian-Shanskij & Nikol’skaya, 1954)
Omalus abdominalis ( du Buysson, 1887)
Omalus violaceus ( Scopoli, 1763)
= O. fuscipennis ( Dahlbom, 1829)
= O. imperiale ( Shuckard, 1837)
= O. violaceus virens ( Mocsáry, 1889)
Omalus joannisi ( du Buysson, 1909)
Omalus punctatus ( Uchida, 1927)
Omalus grandis ( Tsuneki, 1950)
Remarks. Currently, all species included in the Omalus auratus group sensu Linsenmaier are considered members of Pseudomalus , which was never adopted by Linsenmaier (1959a, b, 1968, 1987, 1994, 1997). The following species changed status or resulted belonging to a different genus:
Pseudomalus auratus cupratus Mocsáry, 1889 has been revalidated and raised to species rank by Rosa et al. (2017c); Elampus curtiventris Tournier, 1879 is actually a member of Elampus Spinola, 1806 (type examined).
punctulatus group
Omalus (Omalus) punctulatus Dahlbom, 1854
Omalus punctulatus tricolor Linsenmaier, 1999
Omalus perraudini Linsenmaier, 1968
Omalus bidentulus ( Lepeletier, 1806)
= O. appendicinus Abeille de Perrin, 1878
= O. bidentulus styx Trautmann, 1926
= O. bidentulus uniformis ( Trautmann, 1926)
= O. wesmaeli Chevrier, 1862 )
= O. bidentulus bidentatus Eversmann, 1858
Omalus helveticus Linsenmaier, 1959a
Omalus hirtus ( Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932)
Omalus hirsutus ( Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932)
Omalus nikolskii ( Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932)
Omalus politus ( du Buysson, 1887)
Omalus bogdanovii ( Radoszkowski, 1877)
= O. bogdanovii cerberus ( Trautmann, 1926)
= O. bogdanovi kerteszi ( Trautmann, 1926)
= O. rudowi ( du Buysson, 1887)
= O. bogdanovi unicolor ( Trautmann, 1926)
Omalus biaccinctus (du Buysson, 1892)
= O. gasperinii ( Mocsáry, 1889)
= O. biaccinctus muelleri ( Trautmann, 1926)
Remarks. Currently, all species included in the punctulatus group sensu Linsenmaier are considered members of Philoctetes , excluding Omalus nikolskii ( Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932) (see Rosa et al. 2017a) and O. politus , which are truly Omalus sensu Kimsey & Bohart (1991) .
Omalus bidentulus uniformis ( Trautmann, 1926) could be a teratology of Pseudomalus auratus ( Linnaeus, 1758) (type examined); Omalus bidentatus ( Eversmann, 1858) was often considered as a valid taxon, nevertheless this name is an incorrect subsequent spelling of Omalus bidentulus ( Lepeletier, 1806) ( Rosa et al. 2015e) ; Omalus biaccinctus (du Buysson, 1892) has been considered as nomen protectum ( Rosa et al. 2017c) because Linsenmaier (1951) and other researchers did not recognised the priority of the name O. gasperinii ( Mocsáry, 1889) , which was always incorrectly considered as a synonym of O. biaccinctus or its subspecies (see also Trautmann 1927 and Berland & Bernard 1938, the name gasperinii was also often misspelled as gasparinii).
aeneus group
Omalus (Omalus) aeneus ( Fabricius, 1787)
= O. aeneus atratus ( Mocsáry, 1887)
= O. chevrieri ( Tournier, 1877)
= O. aeneus pygialis ( du Buysson, 1887)
= O. pygmaeus ( Schenck, 1856)
Omalus aeneus puncticollis ( Mocsáry, 1887)
Omalus aeneus sauteri ( Mocsáry, 1913)
Omalus aeneus japonicus ( Bischoff, 1910)
Omalus chlorosomus ( Lucas, 1849)
Omalus chlorosomus mallorcanus Linsenmaier, 1959a
Omalus imbecillus ( Mocsáry, 1889)
Omalus riyadhensis Linsenmaier, 1994
Omalus puncticeps Linsenmaier, 1994
pusillus group
Omalus (Omalus) pusillus ( Fabricius, 1804)
= O. schmiedeknechti ( Mocsáry, 1889))
Omalus pusillus bulgariensis Linsenmaier, 1959a
Omalus pusillus semicupreus Linsenmaier, 1959a
Omalus viridiminor Linsenmaier, 1999
Omalus horvathi ( Mocsáry, 1889)
= O. splendens ( du Buysson, 1900)
= O. wesmaeli ( Mocsáry, 1882)
Omalus horvathi inflammatus ( Mocsáry, 1890)
Omalus dusmeti ( Trautmann, 1926)
= O. horvathi occidentus Linsenmaier, 1968
Omalus sareptanus ( Mocsáry, 1889)
Omalus sareptanus schulthessi ( Mocsáry, 1890)
Omalus sareptanus subauratus ( Mocsáry, 1890)
Omalus magrettii (du Buysson in Magretti, 1890)
Omalus deauratus ( Mocsáry, 1914)
Omalus sinensis ( Tsuneki, 1947)
Remarks. Currently, Omalus pusillus ( Fabricius, 1804) is included in Pseudomalus . All other species listed by Linsenmaier in the pusillus group are members of Philoctetes (sensu Kimsey & Bohart 1991) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |