Phyllophaga (Phyllophaga) pachypyga (Burmeister, 1855)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3722.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:29D77A16-096D-4FC1-A5B4-9EEDF2E761A7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6151929 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3009D414-FFF4-FFBC-39B6-F865FB37A3B7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phyllophaga (Phyllophaga) pachypyga (Burmeister, 1855) |
status |
|
8. Phyllophaga (Phyllophaga) pachypyga (Burmeister, 1855)
Redescription. Male genital capsule ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 ) is cylindrical, parameres are short, wide at the base, and fused dorsally. The long aedeagus is projected from the parameres with spiniform projections at the pre-apical zone, finishing in a long and characteristically curved whip.
Comments. After revising and comparing the type specimens, Morón (2001) analyzed P. nigrofusca (Moser) and P. pachypyga , confirming Frey’s observation (1975) that, in his opinion, both were impossible to distinguish from one another. Ancylonycha pachypyga was described with a male from “ Brazil ”, but Frey (1975) considered that its distribution covered Peru, Venezuela, Colombia, and possibly Panama. Lachnosterna nigrofusca was originally described with males obtained in “ Venezuela ”, which were very similar to P. brevisetosa (Moser) . Morón (2001) studied the A. pachypyga holotype “without data” that was deposited in MLUH, the L. nigrofusca “ Venezuela ” holotype deposited in ZMHU, and two specimens, one male and one female, labeled “ Colombia: Fusagasugá” deposited in ZMHU. There is no precise data on their distribution in Colombia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |