Cybaeus adenes Chamberlin & Ivie 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4711.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:06B09245-2722-4F4D-9076-41E68A17E8A7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2F5B4D33-707C-FFA6-B289-448EFA99FD45 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cybaeus adenes Chamberlin & Ivie 1932 |
status |
|
Cybaeus adenes Chamberlin & Ivie 1932 View in CoL
Figs 1–11 View FIGURES 1–3 View FIGURES 4–8 View FIGURES 9–11 , 59–60 View FIGURES 56–60 , 69 View FIGURE 69
Cybaeus adenes Chamberlin & Ivie 1932: 24 View in CoL , fig. 59 (in part, holotype only). Roewer 1954: 89. Bonnet 1956: 1300. Roth 1956: 178. Roth & Brown 1986: 3. Bennett 2006: 479, Figs 17–20 View FIGURES 15–17 View FIGURES 18–20 . Copley et al. 2009: 372, fig. 5. World Spider Catalog 2019.
Cybaeus grizzlyi: Roth 1956: 178 View in CoL . Roth & Brown 1986: 3.
Cybaeus adenoides: Roth 1956: 178 View in CoL . Roth & Brown 1986: 3.
Type material. Holotype ♀. U.S.A.: California: Marin County, R. V. Chamberlin ( AMNH), examined but subsequently lost. Neotype ♂ designated by Bennett (2006) from U.S.A.: California: Marin County, San Geronimo (37°59'N 122°42'W), 19 September 1963, J. Ivie & W. Ivie ( AMNH), examined. See discussion of type material and synonymy in Bennett (2006).
Other material examined. Specimens and locality data in Bennett (2006). (Note: Green Valley locality, considered by Bennett (2006) to be “probably Sonoma Co.”, could be in Solano Co.)
Diagnosis. The male of C. adenes is diagnosed by the morphology of the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis: tip bifid with the two tips slightly divergent ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–3 , 59–60 View FIGURES 56–60 ). Known males of the other species of the adenes group have either a single ( C. amicus : Fig. 56 View FIGURES 56–60 ; C. auburn : Fig. 63 View FIGURES 61–64 ; C. grizzlyi : Fig. 61 View FIGURES 61–64 ) or trifid ( C. reducens : Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–60 ) tip on the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis. Males of some species also have a bifid tip of the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis but in those males there are fewer peg setae on the patellar apophysis and the bifid tips are more or less convergent ( C. sanbruno : Figs 45 View FIGURES 44–46 , 67 View FIGURES 65–68 ; C. schusteri : Figs 51 View FIGURES 50–53 , 65 View FIGURES 65–68 ).
The female of C. adenes is distinguished from all other females of the adenes group except C. grizzlyi by the form of the atrium. The atrium in females of C. adenes and C. grizzlyi is inverted U-shaped or lyriform, relatively narrow (length from epigastric groove to anterior margin> width between lateral margins), and widest anteriorly ( C. adenes : Figs 4, 7 View FIGURES 4–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–11 ; C. grizzlyi : Fig. 30 View FIGURES 28–30 ). The atrium in females of all other species of the adenes group either has its lateral ends strongly curved anteriorly ( C. sanbruno : Figs 47–48 View FIGURES 47–49 ), is inverted U- or vase-shaped (but not lyriform) and widest posteriorly ( C. schusteri : Fig. 53 View FIGURES 50–53 ; C. amicus : Figs 15–16 View FIGURES 15–17 ; C. torosus : Fig. 54 View FIGURES 54–55 ; C. pearcei : Fig. 33 View FIGURES 33–34 ), or is relatively broad with length <width ( C. reducens : Figs 38, 41, 43 View FIGURES 38–43 ; C. auburn : Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 21–24 ). (Most females of C. schusteri are distinguished by the inverted vase-shaped atrium ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 50–53 ) but the atrial morphology of some specimens may resemble that of females of C. adenes and C. grizzlyi . Collection of males with females may be the only way to ensure reliable identification in such instances.) Females of C. grizzlyi and C. adenes apparently are morphologically indistinguishable but can be separated by their respective distributions: both are found in the San Francisco Bay area of California but C. grizzlyi appears to be restricted to Contra Costa and Alameda Counties to the east of San Francisco Bay ( Fig. 70 View FIGURE 70 ) while C. adenes is more widespread and found to the north and east of the Bay area in Marin, Napa, Sonoma, San Francisco, and possibly Solano Counties ( Fig. 69 View FIGURE 69 ).
Description. Femora unbanded.
Male: (n=9). Patellar apophysis ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–3 ) with variable number of peg setae (most specimens have about two dozen) on concave or convex antero-dorsal surface. Very small retrolateral ridge anteriorly on tibia dorsal to carinate retrolateral tibial apophysis ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–3 ). Dorsal keel ( Figs 59–60 View FIGURES 56–60 ) present on proximal arm of tegular apophysis, usually inconspicuous but occasionally prominent.
(n=8). CL 2.15–2.6 (2.5), CW 1.60–2.00 (1.83), SL 1.08–1.29 (1.22), SW 1.00–1.26 (1.17). Neotype CL 2.45, CW 1.80, SL 1.22, SW 1.17.
Female: (n=39). Atrium ( Figs 4, 7 View FIGURES 4–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–11 ) usually conspicuous, occasionally indistinct such that atrium may appear divided, anterior margin often sinuous, length of atrium (from epigastric groove to anterior margin) 1.5–2 times width (between lateral margins). Copulatory ducts ( Figs 5–6, 8 View FIGURES 4–8 , 10–11 View FIGURES 9–11 ) well separated, attached to lateral margins of atrium.
(n=22). CL 1.58–2.8 (2.2±0.3), CW 1.12–1.90 (1.49±0.23), SL 0.86–1.35 (1.10±0.14), SW 0.79–1.28 (1.02±0.13). Holotype (lost) CL 2.20, CW 1.55, SL 1.12, SW 1.05.
Distribution and natural history. West central California: Marin, Napa, San Francisco, Sonoma, and possibly Solano Counties in the San Francisco Bay area ( Fig. 69 View FIGURE 69 ). Males have been collected from mid-September to mid- November. Cybaeus adenes and C. grizzlyi are the most commonly encountered species of the adenes group.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cybaeus adenes Chamberlin & Ivie 1932
Bennett, Robb, Copley, Claudia & Copley, Darren 2019 |
Cybaeus grizzlyi: Roth 1956: 178
Roth, V. D. & Brown, W. L. 1986: 3 |
Roth, V. D. 1956: 178 |
Cybaeus adenoides:
Roth, V. D. & Brown, W. L. 1986: 3 |
Roth, V. D. 1956: 178 |
Cybaeus adenes
Copley, C. R. & Bennett, R. & Perlman, S. J. 2009: 372 |
Bennett, R. G. 2006: 479 |
Roth, V. D. & Brown, W. L. 1986: 3 |
Bonnet, P. 1956: 1300 |
Roth, V. D. 1956: 178 |
Roewer, C. F. 1954: 89 |
Chamberlin, R. V. & Ivie, W. 1932: 24 |