Thinophilus Wahlberg, 1844
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.878.2153 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:07EFE4B6-4184-41C7-82A5-747BF67BA093 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8119197 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/282DC677-E93A-FF9C-C03F-C89FFAB57AC8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Thinophilus Wahlberg, 1844 |
status |
|
Genus Thinophilus Wahlberg, 1844 View in CoL View at ENA
Thinophilus Wahlberg, 1844: 37 View in CoL .
Type species: Rhaphium flavipalpe Zetterstedt, 1843 (monotypy).
Thinophilus Schiødte, 1844: 44 View in CoL (nec Wahlberg, 1844).
Type species: Rhaphium flavipalpe Zetterstedt, 1843 (monotypy).
Schoenophilus Mik, 1878: 9 View in CoL .
Type species: Thinophilus versutus Haliday, 1851 (original designation).
Pseudacropsilus Strobl, 1899: 122 .
Type species: Pseudacropsilus maculipennis Strobl, 1899 [= Thinophilus versutus (Haliday, 1851) ] (designation by Negrobov 1991: 38).
Paralleloneurum Becker, 1902: 51 View in CoL .
Type species: Paralleloneurum cilifemoratum Becker, 1902 (monotypy), syn. nov.
Parathinophilus Parent, 1932: 161 .
Type species: Parathinophilus expolitus Parent, 1932 (monotypy).
Notes
See diagnosis and discussion in Negrobov (1979) and Grootaert (2018).
Grootaert & Meuffels (1984, 1998) distinguished three subgenera of Thinophilus in the Australasian and Oriental Regions, i.e., Thinophilus s.s., Parathinophilus Parent, 1832 and Schoenophilus Mik, 1878 , and noted that the differences between them are rather poor. Negrobov (1979) and Grootaert & Meuffels (1998) described Paralleloneurum , originally described from Egypt and known also from the Oriental Region. The authors provided only one reliable character, the presence of four pairs of strong dorsocentrals on the mesonotum, to distinguish this genus from Thinophilus with five or more dorsocentrals, either nearly equal in length or greatly decreasing in length anteriorly. Later, a lot of Oriental species of Thinophilus with four pairs of dorsocentrals were described by Grootaert and his co-authors ( Grootaert et al. 2015; Samoh et al. 2017, 2019; Grootaert 2018); with some of these species having apical or dorsoapical arista on postpedicel. Nevertheless, the status of Paralleloneurum Becker, 1902 , Parathinophilus and Schoenophilus was not discussed.
Negrobov (1979) described also Thinophilus versutus Haliday, 1851 in the genus Schoenophilus that was considered a subgenus or synonym of Thinophilus by some authors before and after 1979. He distinguished Schoenophilus from Thinophilus by the presence of only four pairs of dorsocentrals on the mesonotum and from Thinophilus and Paralleloneurum by apical or subapical arista on postpedicel.
Both Paralleloneurum and Schoenophilus are regarded here as synonyms of Thinophilus (see also Discussion section). Therefore, the following new combinations are here established: Thinophilus cilifemoratus ( Becker, 1902) , comb. nov. and T. pygmaeus (De Meijere, 1916) , comb. nov. The latter species is known only from type locality in Indonesia (Java) (De Meijere, 1916). The status of the Australian subgenus Parathinophilus needs further study. As a result, the tribe Thinophilini includes now only two genera, Thinophilus and Machaerium Haliday, 1832 with three known species in the latter genus. Incompletely described Thinophilus aquaticus Becker, 1914 known by females from Kenya (Tiwi), is not included into the key below. Thinophilus atritarsis Parent, 1929 and T. tinctus Parent, 1929 known by females from South Eastern Desert of Egypt were included into the Afrotropical Catalog ( Grichanov 2018), but they are excluded here from the Region. The Palaearctic T. quadrimaculatus Becker, 1902 is also excluded from the Afrotropical fauna (see below). Thinophilus atritarsis , T. tinctus and T. quadrimaculatus are inserted into the key to West and Central Palaearctic species of Thinophilus ( Grichanov 2022) .
Key to Afrotropical species of Thinophilus Wahlberg, 1844 (males)
North African Thinophilus versutus and T. cilifemoratus comb. nov. are included in square brackets. See discussion for species groups and subgroups.
1. Mesonotum with four strong dorsocentrals of almost equal length; body length less than 2.5 mm 2
– Mesonotum with at least five dorsocentrals, usually greatly decreasing in length anteriorly; body usually longer than 3 mm ................................................................................................................. 7
2. Body and legs with only whitish yellow bristles ( Fig. 6A View Fig ); body: 1.7 mm ( T. gallagheri group) ................................................................................................................ T. gallagheri sp. nov.
– Body and legs with mainly black bristles ( T. versutus View in CoL group) .......................................................... 3
3. Palp brown-black; propleural bristles black ( Negrobov 1979: 436); body: 1.7–2.5 mm ................... .................................................................................................................[ T. versutus Haliday, 1851 View in CoL ]
– Palp yellow; propleural bristles white .............................................................................................. 4
4. Male cercus long, reaching almost to base of abdomen ( Fig. 3H View Fig ); body: 2.0– 2.5 mm ...................... ..................................................................................................................... T. prudens Curran, 1926 View in CoL
– Male cercus short, about as long as tergite 5 .................................................................................... 5
5. Male fore femur with long ventral setae, 2 × as long as femur height; legs yellow; cercus yellow ( Fig. 7A View Fig ); body: 2.0 mm ....................................................................................... T. sigwalti sp. nov.
– Male fore femur with short ventral setae, not longer or slightly longer than femur height; legs and cercus yellow or dark ........................................................................................................................ 6
6 Legs mostly brownish yellow, with femora mostly brown; cercus black ( Fig. 8A View Fig ); body: 2.2 mm .. ................................................................................................................................ T. saegeri sp. nov.
– Legs mostly light yellow; cercus yellow ( Negrobov 1979: 437); body: 1.5–2.0 mm......................... ....................................................................................................... [ T. cilifemoratus ( Becker, 1902) ]
7. Scutellum with two pairs of almost equal in length bristles; palp with white setae; body: 6.0 mm (female only) ........................................................................................... T. quadrisetus Parent, 1936 View in CoL
– Another combination of characters ................................................................................................... 8
8. Pedicel long, with broad distodorsal and narrow distoventral lobes ( Negrobov 1978: figs 1384– 1385); sternite 4 of male abdomen with lateral groups of bristles ( Dawah et al. 2020: fig. 5c); body: 5.0– 5.5 mm ............................................................................................... T. promotus Becker, 1910 View in CoL
– Pedicel without such lobes; sternite 4 of male abdomen with at most long hairs ............................ 9
9. Sternites 3 and 4 of male abdomen with tuft of long hairs (e.g., Fig. 3G View Fig ) ( T. imperialis View in CoL group) ... 10
– Sternites 3 and 4 of male abdomen without tuft of long hairs ........................................................ 12
10. Cercus flat and short, band-like (lateral view), pointed on apex, reaching apex of surstylus; Surstylus with one midventral process ( Fig. 3 View Fig С); sternites 3 and 4 of abdomen with tuft of white hairs; body: 6–7 mm ............................................................................................... T. ciliventris Grichanov, 1997 View in CoL
– Cercus very long, extending to base of abdomen, broad on basal third, filiform distally; sternites 3 and 4 of abdomen with tuft of mainly black hairs ...........................................................................11
11. Fore tibia with 3–4 dorsal bristles, not longer than tibia width; surstylus at middle 2 × as wide as that at base (lateral view) ( Fig. 3F View Fig ); body: 5.5 mm ...................................... T. imperialis ( Curran, 1924) View in CoL
– Fore tibia with 3–4 dorsal bristles, 2 × as long as tibia width; surstylus at middle slightly wider than that at base (lateral view) ( Fig. 9E View Fig ); body: 6.3 mm ........................................ T. longicercus sp. nov.
12. Mesonotum with distinct dark lateral spot at notopleura (e.g., Dawah et al. 2020: fig. 5a) ( T. indigenus View in CoL group) .............................................................................................................................................. 13
– Mesonotum monochrome, or with longitudinal stripes dorsally, without dark lateral spots, rarely with postalar dark spot .................................................................................................................... 16
13. Mesonotum with additional spot in front of scutellum ................................................................... 14
– Mesonotum without spot in front of scutellum ............................................................................... 15
14. Fore basitarsus without ventral spines, with simple setulae only ( Dawah et al. 2020: fig. 5a); male genitalia as in Negrobov (1978: figs 1371–1373); body: 2.5–3.0 mm ..... T. indigenus Becker, 1902 View in CoL
– Fore basitarsus with row of very short spinules ( Vanschuytbroeck 1951: fig. 20); body: 5.2– 5.8 mm .................................................................................... T. splendidus Vanschuytbroeck, 1951 View in CoL
15. Mesonotum with five dorsocentrals; legs mostly yellow; fore femur without ventral comb of setae; mid tibia curved at middle (Bezzi 1906: 302); body: 4 mm .................... T. setulipalpis Bezzi, 1906 View in CoL
– Mesonotum with at least six dorsocentrals; legs mostly black; fore femur with ventral rows of black setae ( Curran, 1926: fig. 14); mid tibia simple; body: 5.0– 5.5 mm ..................... T. rex Curran, 1926 View in CoL
16. Scutellum with 3 to 8 pairs of strong marginal spines in addition to one pair of long bristles; tarsomeres 1 and 2 of hind tarsus annulate with yellow and black ( T. quadrisetus View in CoL group, in part) 17
– Scutellum with at most two pairs of bristles; hind tarsomeres variously coloured ........................ 18
17. Fore coxa with black setae and pale hairs; fore femur with a few long black ventral hairs in basal third; scutellum with 6 to 8 pairs of spines ( Fig. 4 View Fig С); body: 4.5–5.0 mm .......................................... .......................................................................................................... T. munroi munroi Curran, 1926 View in CoL
– Fore coxa and femur with pale hairs only; scutellum with 3 to 5 pairs of spines ( Fig. 5 View Fig С); body: 4.5–4.7 mm ..................................................................... T. munroi setiscutellatus Grichanov, 1997 View in CoL
18. Male hind coxa with long straight apical spine ( Dawah et al. 2020: fig. 5b); body: 4.0– 4.5 mm ................................................................................................... T. ochripalpis Becker, 1910 View in CoL
– Male hind coxa without spine ......................................................................................................... 19
19. Male fore basitarsus with nearly right-angled bend; mid femur with posteroventral setae in middle part, at least half as long as femur diameter; male genitalia as in Negrobov (1978: figs 1378–1380), Grichanov (1997: fig. 1); body: 3.9–5.5 ................................................... T. mirandus Becker, 1907 View in CoL
– Male fore basitarsus straight or fairly curved; mid femur with short or long setae in middle part 20
20. Palp with black setae; tarsi gradually darkened towards tarsomere 5 ( T. indigenus View in CoL group mainly) ............................................................................................................................................ 21
– Palp with white setae; tarsomeres often more or less distinctly annulated ( T. calopus View in CoL group) ...... 28
21. Fore basitarsus with ventral row of short but strong black spines, at least half as long as article diameter .......................................................................................................................................... 22
– Fore basitarsus without ventral spines, with simple setulae only ................................................... 23
22. Fore tarsomere 4with strong dorsal bristle, as long as or longer than tarsomeres 4 and 5 combined; male genitalia as in Negrobov (1978: figs 1393–1396); body: 3.7–5.4 mm .... T. spinitarsis Becker, 1907 View in CoL
– Fore tarsomere 4 with short setae; body: 4 mm ....................................... T. spinulosus Parent, 1929 View in CoL
23. Wing crossvein dm-m half as long as distal part of M 4 ( Fig. 10F View Fig ); fore tibia ⅓ longer than fore tarsus (4 /) ( Fig. 10D–E View Fig ); body: 1.8 mm ( T. deemingi group) ....................................... T. deemingi sp. nov. 3
– Wing crossvein dm-m as long as or ⅔ as long as distal part of M 4; fore tibia not longer than fore tarsus ............................................................................................................................................... 24
24. Antenna almost entirely yellow, brownish dorsally; femora with 2 more or less full rows of ventral setae, nearly half as long as femur height; cercus broad in middle, narrowed towards apex; dm-m as long as distal part of M 4 ( Grichanov 2012: fig. 24); body: 3.5 mm ............. T. palpatus Parent, 1929 View in CoL
– Antenna distinctly black dorsally; other features various ............................................................... 25
25. Fore coxa with mainly white setae, with at most 2–3 black apical bristles; mid coxa with white setae and 1 black bristle; cerci dorsally adjoined, leaflike ( Fig. 11G View Fig ); body: 4.3 mm ................................ ........................................................................................................................ T. manambato sp. nov.
– Fore coxa with mainly black bristles and setae; mid coxa with black bristle and setae; cerci various.............................................................................................................................................. 26
26. Wing crossvein dm-m ⅔ as long as distal part of M 4; cercus gradually narrowed towards apex ( Fig. 3E View Fig ); body: 4–5 mm ............................................................................ T. capensis Curran, 1926 View in CoL
– Wing crossvein dm-m as long as distal part of M 4; cercus leaflike ................................................ 27
27. Antenna almost entirely black; palp black-brown on basal half; cerci dorsally widely separated, elongate-ovate, with narrow finger-like apex ( Fig. 13F View Fig ); body: 3.8 mm ( T. versutus View in CoL group, in part) ................................................................................................................... T. cataractae sp. nov.
– Antenna black dorsally, yellow ventrally; palp entirely yellow; cerci dorsally adjoined, leaflike ( Fig. 12F View Fig ); body: 3.1 mm ...................................................................................... T. fluvialis sp. nov.
28. Fore coxa anteriorly and fore femur ventrally with mainly black hairs; hind femur poorly setose; cercus 1.5 × as long as tergite 5 ( Fig. 3D View Fig ); body: 6 mm .............................. T. virgatus Curran, 1926 View in CoL
– Fore coxa and femur with almost exclusively white hairs; hind femur with or without long setae; male cercus at most as long as tergite 5 .......................................................................................... 29
29. Hind femur with ventral rows of black setae, about 2 × as long as femur height ( Fig. 2C View Fig ); all tarsomeres annulate with black and white ( Fig. 2A View Fig ); body: 4–5 mm ............. T. calopus Loew, 1852 View in CoL
– Hind femur with ventral rows of short white hairs or glabrous; tarsi not annulate ........................ 30
30. All tarsi entirely black or brownish at base ( Fig. 1A View Fig ); surstylus straight, slightly narrowed distally ( Fig. 1E View Fig ); body: 2.5–3.3 mm ............................................................... T. argyropalpis Becker, 1910 View in CoL
– All tarsi mostly yellow, with last segments dark or dark at apices ( T. quadrisetus View in CoL group, in part) 31
31. Mid femur with row of ventral setae on distal half, 2 × as long as femur height; tarsi gradually darkened towards tips ( Fig. 15A View Fig ); surstylus bilobate, with narrow lobes ( Fig. 15F View Fig ); cerci free, evenly broad to apex ( Fig. 15E View Fig ); body: 4 mm ........................................................... T. subpalpatus sp. nov.
– Mid femur with rows of ventral setae, half as long as femur height; tarsomere 5 of all tarsi deep black ( Fig. 14D View Fig ); tarsomeres 1–4 of fore and mid tarsi yellow ( Fig. 14A View Fig ); tarsomeres 1–4 of fore tarsus ventrally with silvery shine; surstylus one-lobed, widened distally (lateral view); cerci dorsally fused at base, free and narrow distally ( Fig. 14G View Fig ); body: 5.5 mm ............................. T. medvedevi sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Empidoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Hydrophorinae |
Tribe |
Thinophilini |
Thinophilus Wahlberg, 1844
Grichanov, Igor Ya. 2023 |
Parathinophilus
Parent O. 1932: 161 |
Paralleloneurum
Becker T. 1902: 51 |
Pseudacropsilus
Strobl G. 1899: 122 |
Thinophilus
Wahlberg P. E. 1844: 37 |
Thinophilus Schiødte, 1844: 44
Schiodte J. C. 1844: 44 |