Paratetrapedia (Lophopedia) pygmaea ( Schrottky, 1902 )

Aguiar, Antonio J. C. & Melo, Gabriel A. R., 2005, Notes on the type species of the subgenera Paratetrapedia (Lophopedia) and P. (Amphipedia) (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Tapinotaspidini), Zootaxa 1084, pp. 31-42 : 38

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.170446
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:73CE1F64-8C68-4616-9AD2-3856C79B1FCD
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3500960
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2723581B-FFF9-8526-C804-FC63FBCFF9BD
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Paratetrapedia (Lophopedia) pygmaea ( Schrottky, 1902 )
status

Treatment

Paratetrapedia (Lophopedia) pygmaea ( Schrottky, 1902) View in CoL

Tetrapaedia [sic] pygmaea Schrottky, 1902: 544 View in CoL . Lectotype male, here designated, Brasil: São Paulo, Jundiaí (MZSP).

Tetrapedia pigmaea [sic] Schrottky (1902): 541.

Tetrapedia pygmaea View in CoL ; Schrottky (1913): 260.

Paratetrapedia pygmaea View in CoL ; Moure (1942): 301. RoigAlsina (1997): 4. Sazima and Sazima (1989): 108.

Paratetrapedia (Lophopedia) pygmaea View in CoL ; Michener and Moure (1957): 415, figs.16–18 (drawings of S7–S8, and genitalia). Pedro (1994): 252. Pedro and Camargo (1999): 202. Aguiar et al. (2004): 82.

P. (Lophopedia) cf. pygmaea View in CoL ; Pedro (1996): 251.

Comments

Paratetrapedia (Lophopedia) pygmaea belongs to a group of species possessing a carinate omaulus. The species in this group are difficult to distinguish from each other in the females, which present very similar patterns of sculpture and pubescence. A more thorough revision of this group is necessary to better diagnose its species and details on how to separate this species from others cannot be given at this time.