Tricondyla pulchripes White, 1844
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.10134379 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E6D1CE86-8AC8-4934-9D1B-7EE385D25309 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/266087B2-920D-A868-B895-FA1CA705FA50 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Tricondyla pulchripes White, 1844 |
status |
|
3. Tricondyla pulchripes White, 1844 View in CoL
( Fig. 9 – 12 View Figures 9–12 , 27, 28 View Figures 23–34 )
长胸缺翅虎甲 chǎng xiōng quē chì hǔ jiǎ
Listings. Wiesner 1992: 19, Naviaux 2002: 36, Putchkov and Matalin 2003: 119, Sawada and Wiesner 2004: 272, 2006: 455, Shook and Wiesner 2006: 21, Shook and Wu 2007: 93, Wu and Shook 2007: 39, 2010: 89, Wu 2011: 32, Aston 2016: 213, Wiesner and Geiser 2016: 62, Putchkov and Matalin 2017: 249, Wiesner et al. 2017: 5, Wiesner 2020: 37.
Diagnosis. Habitus medium in size, very elongated; black with shiny appearance; head rather small, short, temples oblique; interocular cavity not deep, the two longitudinal grooves clearly impressed; pronotum very long, subparallel-sided, distinctly striated, barely convex in lateral view; elytra regularly but feebly widened, poorly gibbose; sculpture formed by large pits arranged in transversal rows; aedeagus thick at base, gradually thinner towards apex.
Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hong Kong, Yunnan), Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.