Orthomus berytensis (Reiche et Saulcy, 1855)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.30.4.06 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13178454 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/25357A69-FFBF-9F23-FF4C-FADC08D356FF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Orthomus berytensis (Reiche et Saulcy, 1855) |
status |
|
Orthomus berytensis (Reiche et Saulcy, 1855) View in CoL
Figs 65–70 View Figs 65–76 .
Dorsum black to dark brown, often with reddish hue, shiny in both sexes (females show fine microreticulation), appendices with lighter coloration brown red. Body length variable 8.0–11.0 mm. Eye convex, protruding, tempora oblique.
Pronotum transverse almost rectangular, regularly curved, well narrowed forward and moderately backward, maximum width near middle ( Fig. 65 View Figs 65–76 ), anterior angle briefly projected forward, anterior basis almost regularly arcuate; posterior angle obtuse with a tiny tooth ( Fig. 66 View Figs 65–76 ), posterior basis beaded up to the origin of the inner fovea; external fovea weakly impressed, inner fovea linear; punctures usually in low density or entirely absent (in East Mediterranean populations punctures are more abundant); space between external fovea and side somewhat convex.
Elytra slightly enlarged from basis, humerus with a small and non-protruding tooth, striae smooth or with traces of punctures, intervals flat, discal pores on stria 3.
Prosternal process slightly truncate; ventral segments with shallow punctures at sides ( Fig. 67 View Figs 65–76 ), metepisterna smooth. Male mesotibia slightly dilated apically, metatibia moderately crenulate.
Apical shaft of median lobe of aedeagus wide and with trapezoid shape, only briefly narrowed to tip ( Fig. 68 View Figs 65–76 ), in lateral view somewhat ventrally bent ( Fig. 69 View Figs 65–76 ). The female genitalia match in all details the characters described by Ortuño [1996] for the O. barbarus and O. velocissimus groups, in that there is a long spermathecal duct (where a caecum is originated) followed by a long a slightly dilated spermatheca toward apex ( Fig. 70 View Figs 65–76 ). Therefore, this pattern clearly differs from that found in the other Maghrebian taxa [ Pupier, Coulon, 2013]. These findings suggests that the species is more closely related to the north Mediterranean lineages than to the Maghrebian ones. However, the species occupies the whole North Africa, and to the east occupies Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey, Cyprus and Greece, that is, a North African geographic pattern. Indeed, it is also found in Sicily, Sardinia and Malta, and to west reaches the southernmost parts of Morocco and the Canary Islands. Analyses of new characters are needed to better assess its phylogenetic affinities.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |