Haphsa Distant, 1905
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.182498 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6233571 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/233E87B5-FF87-6C44-B7E3-FED9FCBF7A6D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Haphsa Distant, 1905 |
status |
|
Genus Haphsa Distant, 1905 View in CoL
Haphsa Distant, 1905a: 64 View in CoL . Type species: Dundubia nicomache Walker, 1850 View in CoL (North India). Aola Distant, 1905a: 69 View in CoL . Type species: Pomponia bindusara Distant, 1881 View in CoL . syn. nov.
Remarks. The genus Aola Distant, 1905 was established based mainly on the following characteristics distinguishable from allied genera: postclypeus prominent anterad; abdomen short, about as long as distance from head to cruciform elevation; opercula short, not or scarcely extending beyond sternite II and not covering lateral margins of timbal covers. However, only the last characteristic (operculum shape) is effective for distinguishing this genus from the closely allied genera, Haphsa and Meimuna .
So far only Aola bindusara (Distant, 1881) , as the type species, has been placed in this genus. However, the peculiar shape of the operculum of Aola bindusara is thought to be an infrageneric, not intergeneric, variation. Beuk (2002) argued that Aola bindusara should form a monophyletic group together with Haphsa nicomache (Walker, 1850) , the type species of Haphsa , together with some other species currently placed in Haphsa and Meimuna . Therefore, Aola is synonymized here with Haphsa , placing bindusara in Haphsa .
Pomponia scitula Distant, 1888 , once a member of Aola but placed in Pomponia again by China (1925), is also placed here in Haphsa because the above-mentioned main characteristics of Aola are present in this species although the shape of the operculum is peculiar. Again, this is interpreted as an infrageneric variation of Haphsa .
65. Haphsa scitula (Distant, 1888) comb. nov.
Pomponia scitula Distant, 1888c: 456 View in CoL [TL: Burma; Tenasserim]; Jacobi, 1905: 431; Boulard, 2003c: 179; Sanborn et al., 2007: 29.
Aola scitula: Distant, 1917a: 101 View in CoL ; Metcalf, 1963a: 519.
Distribution. China (Xinjiang, Yunnan and Guangxi), N. Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Myanmar and India.
66. Haphsa bindusara (Distant, 1881) comb. nov.
Pomponia bindusara Distant, 1881: 642 View in CoL [TL: Tenasserim].
Aola bindusara: Distant, 1917a: 101 View in CoL ; Metcalf, 1963a: 519; Sanborn et al., 2007: 32. Distribution. China (Yunnan), Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar and India.
67. Haphsa crassa Distant, 1905 View in CoL
Haphsa crassa Distant, 1905a: 64 View in CoL [TL: Yun-nan]; Distant, 1917b: 319; Metcalf, 1963a: 573.
Distribution. China (Yunnan) and Vietnam.
Remarks. Beuk (2002) argued that this species should be congeneric with Meimuna mongolica (Distant) and its relatives ( Meimuna mongolica group), which he also argued should receive a new generic name. Until the new genus is described, this species remains in Haphsa .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Cicadinae |
Tribe |
Cicadini |
Haphsa Distant, 1905
Lee, Young June 2008 |
Aola scitula:
Distant 1917: 101 |
Aola bindusara:
Distant 1917: 101 |
Haphsa
Distant 1905: 64 |
Aola
Distant 1905: 69 |
Haphsa crassa
Distant 1905 |
Haphsa crassa
Distant 1905: 64 |
Pomponia scitula
Distant 1888: 456 |
Pomponia bindusara
Distant 1881 |
Pomponia bindusara
Distant 1881: 642 |
Dundubia nicomache
Walker 1850 |