Robopus Motschulsky
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4970.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:64DAD679-5885-4700-92E2-EBD7DA6BCD40 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756555 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/216187AC-FF91-1103-DAE2-CCA83C3BC302 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Robopus Motschulsky |
status |
|
Robopus Motschulsky View in CoL
Robopus Motschulsky 1853: 41 View in CoL
Rabopus, Motschulsky 1854b: 42 (lapsus calami)
Pygolampis Dejean 1833: 102 View in CoL syn. [ McDermott 1966: 50]
Diphotus Barber 1941: 12 View in CoL syn. [ McDermott 1964: 7]
TYPE SPECIES: Robopus roseicollis Motschulsky, 1854b
KEYS: Paulian 1947; Kazantsev & Perez-Gelabert 2009; Constantin 2012
LITERATURE: Gyllenhal 1817a: 63; Gyllenhal 1817b: 21; Dejean 1833: 102; Laporte 1833: 141; Motschulsky 1853: 41–42, 48–49; Motschulsky 1854b: 41–42; Jacquelin du Val 1857: 87–88; Lacordaire 1857: 323; Chevrolat 1858: 209; Gemminger & de Harold 1869: 1641–1642, 1644; Chevrolat 1870: 77–78; Marshall 1878: xxx; Gorham 1880a: 25; Stahl 1882b: 171; Gundlach 1891: 252; E. Olivier 1899a: 92; E. Olivier 1902: 318–319; E. Olivier 1907: 34–38; E. Olivier 1910: 26–27, 29–31; Lund 1911: 417; E. Olivier 1912b: 26–27, 29, 31–34; Leng & Mutchler 1914: 432; Holland & Schwarz 1917: 338; Mutchler 1923b: 2–5; Leng & Mutchler 1922: 436–437; Wolcott 1923: 81 ; Gowdey 1926: 13; Wolcott 1936: 201 ; Barber 1941: 3–4, 12–13; Buck 1941: 17, 19; Buck 1942: 124–125, 128–129; Blackwelder 1945: 354, 357–359; Buck 1947: 60–62, 70–74, 78–79; Paulian 1947: 161–162; Wolcott 1948: 282 ; McDermott 1952a: 94; McDermott 1955: 49–52; McDermott 1962: 22–23; McDermott 1964: 3, 7, 9, 14, 28, 54, 61, 66; Seliger et al. 1964a: 162–164, 169–170; Seliger et al. 1964b: 96, 100–101, 103; McDermott 1966: 50–53, 67; Lloyd 1969: 175; Blackwelder & Arnett 1974: R56.7–R56.12; Chalumeau 1985: 150; Peck 2005: 115; Branham 2006: 49–50; Kazantsev 2007: 367, 369, 380–383, 389–391; Kazantsev 2008: 101–103; Perez-Gelabert 2008: 102; Ivie 2009: 96; Kazantsev & Perez-Gelabert 2009: 367–368, 387–392, 400–402; Perez-Gelabert 2011a: 75; Perez-Gelabert 2011b: 127, 129; Constantin 2012: 14–15, 17, 22–25; Peck & Perez-Gelabert 2012: 18, 25; Touroult & Poirier 2012: 30, 34, 48; Kazantsev & Perez-Gelabert 2013: 266, 268–270; Touroult et al. 2013: 23, 29, 33, 36, 49; Touroult et al. 2014: 28, 42, 50; Touroult et al. 2015: 33; de Armas & Madruga 2018: 278; Perez-Gelabert 2020: 131; Madruga & de Armas 2019: 265, 267; Meurgey & Ramage 2020: 80
CUBA: ( Peck & Perez-Gelabert 2012)
HISPANIOLA: ( Peck & Perez-Gelabert 2012)
PUERTO RICO: ( Peck & Perez-Gelabert 2012)
ST. LUCIA: ( Ivie 2009)
REMARKS: Misspelled as Rhobopus by Ivie (2009)
44 species
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Lampyrinae |
Tribe |
Photinini |
Robopus Motschulsky
Keller, Oliver & Branham, Marc A. 2021 |
Diphotus
McDermott, F. A. 1964: 7 |
Barber, H. S. 1941: 12 |
Rabopus
Motschulsky, V. 1854: 42 |
Robopus
Motschulsky, V. 1853: 41 |
Pygolampis
McDermott, F. A. 1966: 50 |
Dejean, P. F. M. A. 1833: 102 |