Cosmocerca podicipinus Baker & Vaucher, 1984
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.175288 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5673238 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/211CD155-C713-FFDA-01EF-FB5F36EBFCE6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cosmocerca podicipinus Baker & Vaucher, 1984 |
status |
|
Cosmocerca podicipinus Baker & Vaucher, 1984 ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 )
This species is readily distinguished from other species by the fusion of the underlying sclerotized plectane supports between the plectanes ( Baker & Vaucher 1984). The metric characters of males and females are presented and compared with material reported from other hosts in Table 2.
Remarks
The genus Cosmocerca is widely distributed in amphibians and reptiles in South American ( Baker 1987), with nine species of Cosmocerca occurring in the region; C. brasiliensis Travassos, 1925 ; C. chilensis Lent and Freitas, 1948 ; C. cruzi Rodrigues and Fabio, 1970 ; C. paraguayensis Moravec and Kaiser, 1994 ; C. parva Travassos, 1925 ; C. podicipinus Baker and Vaucher, 1984 ; C. rara Freitas and Vicente, 1966 ; C. travassosi Rodrigues and Fabio, 1970 ; and C. uruguayensis Lent and Freitas, 1948 ( Bursey & Goldberg 2004; 2005).
Baker and González and Present study Present study Vaucher Hamann (2004) † C. fernandezae C. bergi (1984) *
Total length M 1.88–3.17mm 1.72–3.22mm 3.15–3.82mm 2.03–3.87mm
F 2.86–7.33mm 3.3–6.0mm 2.35–4.29mm 2.4–6.97mm Width M – 120–225 184–241 160–300
F – 150–240 210–285 222–340 Pharynx M – 21–39 x 16–21 23 –32 x 21–23 20 – 27 x 18–25
F – 23–48 x 21–28 30 –50 x 32 –50 32–46 x 32 –53 Muscular esophagus M – 189–230 x 18–30 195–241 x 23–32 170–275 x 19–30
F – 219–271 x 25–35 282–400 x 34 –49 258–324 x 34 –48 Bulb M – 37–60 x 46 –57 55–69 x 48 –67 50–80 x 45 –78
F – 48–81 x 58 –78 71–110 x 90 –138 69–103 x 89 –108 Nerve ring from anterior end M 168–250 172–184 No obs. 110–230
F 176–247 240–260 162–300 180–240 Excretory pore from anterior end M 258–376 235–330 184–324 130–425 * from: Leptodactylus podicipinus , L. fuscus , L. elenae , L. chaquensis . † from: Pseudopaludicola falcipes .
Cosmocerca podicipinus was originally described from Leptodactylus podicipinus View in CoL of Capitan Bado, Amambay province, Paraguay. It has also been reported in Leptodactylus fuscus View in CoL , L. elenae View in CoL and L. chaquensis (Leptodactylidae) View in CoL from Paraguay ( Baker & Vaucher 1984); Atelopus spurrelli (Bufonidae) View in CoL and Dendrobates histrionicus (Dendrobatidae) View in CoL from Colombia ( Goldberg & Bursey 2003); Bufo typhonius (Bufonidae) View in CoL , Colostethus marchesianus , Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae) , Eleutherodactylus imitatrix and Leptodactylus leptodactyloides (Leptodactylidae) View in CoL from Peru (Bursey et al. 2001), and Pseudopaludicola falcipes , Leptodactylus bufonius View in CoL , L. chaquensis (Leptodactylidae) View in CoL and Chaunus granulosus major (Bufonidae) from Corrientes, Argentina ( González & Hamann 2004; 2006a; 2006b; Hamann et al. 2006).
The general morphology of the present specimens corresponds to the original description, although the body size of male specimens are greater than those from other hosts in the same region ( Table 2); female worms, however, are shorter in length than those of Baker and Vaucher (1984). Egg length falls within the range described by Baker and Vaucher (1984) and González and Hamann (2004), while the length of spicules in C. fernandezae and C. bergi is less than that studied by Baker and Vaucher (1984) and by González and Hamann (2004). We considered these differences intraspecific variations.
Cosmocerca parva Travassos, 1925 ( Figs. 2–3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 )
This species is distinguished from the Cosmocerca podicipinus by the morphology of the plectanes; in C. podicipinus the plectanes on each side of body are fused by underlying sclerotized supports, whereas in C. parva union between the plectanas of each row does not exist.
Morphometric characteristics of male and female C. parva are presented in Table 3 View TABLE 3 and compared with data from other hosts.
* from Hyla fuscovaria , Bufo paracnemis , Leptodactylus chaquensis , L. elenae . † from Bufo granulosus major
£ from Elosia nasus
‡ from Chaunus granulosus major
Remarks
In South America, Cosmocerca parva was found in Leptodactylus mystaceus , L. caliginosus , L. fuscus , L. ocellatus , Adenomera marmorata , Physalaemus signiferus , P. soaresi and Elosia nasus (Leptodactylidae) and Olylogon fuscovaria (Hylidae) from Brazil ( Travassos, 1925; 1931; Silva 1954; Fabio 1982); in Leptodactylus sp., L. chaquensis , L. elenae (Leptodactylidae) and Olylogon fuscovaria (Hylidae) from Paraguay ( Masi Pallares & Maciel 1974; Baker & Vaucher 1984), in Bufo glaberrimus , B. marinus and B. typhonius (Bufonidae) , in Epipedobates pictus (Dendrobatidae) , in Hyla fasciata , Phyllomedusa atelopoides , Scarthyla ostinodactyla , Scinax garbei and S. ictericus (Hylidae) , in Edalorhina perezi , Eleutherodactylus fenestratus , E. peruvianus , E. toftae , Leptodactylus leptodactyloides and L. mystaceus (Leptodactylidae) and in Elachistocleis ovalis and Hamptophryne boliviana (Microhylidae) from Peru (Bursey et al. 2001). In Argentina it was found in Chaunus granulosus major (Bufonidae) and in Leptodactylus bufonius and L. chaquensis (Leptodactylidae) ( Mordeglia & Digiani 1998; González & Hamann 2006a; 2006b; Hamann et al. 2006).
Our measurements of this nematode agree with data collected in other hosts in the same region. Although male C. parva may possess 5–7 pairs of plectanes ( Baker & Vaucher 1984), in all the males we examined only 5 pairs of plectanas were present ( Table 3 View TABLE 3 ). The number of pairs of adanal papillae varies from 2–4 pairs in C. fernandezae but 3 pairs were consistently present in C. bergi we examined. Additionally in C. bergi we did not observe an unpaired papilla on the anterior lip of the anus, as reported by Mordeglia and Digiani (1998). We consider the differences reported here as intraspecific variation.
Baker and Va uch er (1984)* | Mordeglia and Digiani (1998)† | Travassos (1931)£ | González and Hamann (2006b)‡ | Present study C. fernandezae | Present study C. bergi | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total length | M | 1.68–2.46mm | 1.42–2.0mm | 3.5mm | 1.2–2.3mm | 1.32–3.0mm | 1.17–1.7mm |
F | 2.64–6.62mm | 1.49–5.91mm | 6.8mm | 3.52–5.1mm | 4.57–6.66mm | 2.74–5.56mm | |
Width | M | – | 212–428 | 180 | 160–230 | 103–280 | 140–240 |
F | – | 183–571 | 700 | 264–312 | 258–500 | 240–414 | |
Pharynx | M | – | 22–26 long | – | 23–32 x 19–29 | 23–45 x 16–55 | 21–30 x 18–25 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cosmocerca podicipinus Baker & Vaucher, 1984
González, Cynthya Elizabeth & Hamann, Monika Inés 2007 |
Cosmocerca parva
Travassos 1925 |