Parasyrisca arrabonica Szinetár & Eichardt, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.16.234 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:033AB08E-757C-4716-B928-C116679E55DF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3791830 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/69680F28-ED7D-4B22-876D-7D67454F0F9A |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:69680F28-ED7D-4B22-876D-7D67454F0F9A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Parasyrisca arrabonica Szinetár & Eichardt |
status |
sp. nov. |
Parasyrisca arrabonica Szinetár & Eichardt View in CoL , sp. n.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:69680F28-ED7D-4B22-876D-7D67454F0F9A
Figs 1-17 View Figures 1-6 View Figures 7-9 View Figures 10-11 View Figures 12-14 View Figures 15-17
Material examined. Type material. Holotype. Male ( NHMH) from Hungary, Győrszentiván, Gazdák erdeje, N 47°42'56", E 17°47'33", 125 m, Barber traps, 01.10- 02.12.2004, leg. Cs. Szinetár. GoogleMaps
Paratypes. 1 female ( NHMH) from the same locality, Barber traps, 15.01- 02.04.2005, leg. Cs. Szinetár ; 1 male from Bugac N 46°39'36", E 19°35'14", 110 m, Barber traps, 02.09.2003, leg. Cs. Szinetár GoogleMaps ; 3 males (2-UWM, 1- ZMUC) from the same locality, Barber traps, 04.10- 18.10.2003, leg. R. Gallé GoogleMaps ; 2 males from Orgovány N 46°42'25", E 19°30'57", 100 m, Barber traps, 02.10.2007, leg. Cs. Szinetár. GoogleMaps
Etymology. The species’ name refers to the type-locality. Arrabonicum is the Latin name of the Kisalföld.
Remarks. P. arrabonica Szinetár & Eichardt , sp. n. belongs to the potanini speciesgroup. It is quite similar to P. turkenica Ovtsharenko, Platnick & Marusik, 1995 and P.
songi Marusik & Fritzén, 2009 , in having a long RTA ( Figs 2, 3 View Figures 1-6 , 7-9 View Figures 7-9 ), and a blunt terminal apophysis ( Figs 2 View Figures 1-6 , 7 View Figures 7-9 , 10 View Figures 10-11 ); these three species might even deserve a separate species-group. However, without detailed comparative study of the two taxa mentioned above or a cladistic analysis to judge the shared characters we are reluctant to propose a formal new group, but feel the similarity is worth mentioning.
Diagnosis. Males resemble those of P. turkenica , but can be easily recognized by the shorter and thicker retrolateral tibial apophysis ( Figs 2, 3 View Figures 1-6 , 7-9 View Figures 7-9 ) and the thinner and straight, erect conductor ( Figs 2 View Figures 1-6 , 7, 8 View Figures 7-9 , 10 View Figures 10-11 ). The shape of the tibial apophysis is similar to that of P. songi in lateral view but significantly smaller ( Figs 3 View Figures 1-6 , 8, 9 View Figures 7-9 ) and the conductor and terminal apophysis are somewhat different ( Figs 2 View Figures 1-6 , 7 View Figures 7-9 , 10 View Figures 10-11 ). The epigyne of P. arrabonica Szinetár & Eichardt , sp. n. ( Fig. 4 View Figures 1-6 ) is similar to that of P. turkenica but the shape of the anterior hood differs, being twice as wide as high, with the epigynal plate depressed at the posterior end as a posterior ridge of a flat U shape, with two pointing tips on the sides ( Fig. 4 View Figures 1-6 ).
Description. Male. Habitus as seen in Figs 13-14 View Figures 12-14 . Total length 7.1. Carapace 2.6 long, 2.1 wide. Femur II 2.2 long. Eye sizes and interdistance: AME 0.16, ALE 0.14, PME 0.14, PLE 0.12; AME - AME 0.08, AME - ALE 0.04, PME - PME 0.1, PME - PLE 0.14, ALE - PLE 0.16; MOQ lenght 0.46, front width 0.36, back width 0.4.
Leg spination: femora; I,II d 1-1-0, p 0-0-1; III d 1-1-0, p 0-1-1, r 0-0-1; IV d 1-1-0, (without prolateral spine), r 0-0-1; tibiae I v 2-2-0; II v 1-1-0; III v 1-1-2, p 1-1-0, r 1-1-0; IV v 1-2-2, p 0-1-1, r 1-0-1; metatarsi I-II v 2-0-0; III v 2-0-2, p 2-0-2, r 2-0-2; IV v 1-0-2, p 2-0-2, r 2-0-2.
Palps ( Figs 1-3 View Figures 1-6 , 7-11 View Figures 7-9 View Figures 10-11 ) with strong, well developed, long RTA ( Figs 2-3 View Figures 1-6 ), reach ¼ of cymbium length ( Figs 2-3 View Figures 1-6 , 7-9 View Figures 7-9 ). RTA tip seems abrupt in lateral view. Conductor ( Fig. 10 View Figures 10-11 ) twisted, directed upward ( Fig. 2 View Figures 1-6 ), gradually tapered at end, twisted in shape ( Figs 2 View Figures 1-6 , 10 View Figures 10-11 ), with thin tip ( Fig. 8 View Figures 7-9 ) clearly visible in frontal and lateral views. Embolus unusually long, largely covered by conductor, visible only after conductor is removed ( Fig. 11 View Figures 10-11 ). Terminal apophysis thick, curved toward sides ( Figs 2-3 View Figures 1-6 , 10 View Figures 10-11 ).
Colouration. ( Fig. 12 View Figures 12-14 ) Legs yellowish-brown, tibia, metatarsus and tarsus slightly darker than proximal segments. Carapace also yellowish-brown, but head somewhat darker. Chelicerae, cymbia, gnathocoxae and labium also darker brown. Abdomen grayish–brown with a few narrow, light brown stripes at the posterior end, just before the spinnerets.
Female. Total length 9.2. Carapace 3.3 long, 2.3 wide. Femur II 2.2 long. Eye sizes and interdistance: AME 0.16, ALE 0.14, PME 0.16, PLE 0.12; AME - AME 0.1,
AME - ALE 0.04, PME - PME 0.12, PME - PLE 0.16, ALE - PLE 0.18; MOQ length 0.52, front width 0.36, back width 0.4. Leg spination: femora; I,II d 1-1-0, p 0-0-1; III d 1-1-0, p 0-0-1, r 0-0-1; IV d 1-1-0, (without prolateral spine), r 0-0-1; tibiae I v 2-2-0; II v 1-1-0; III v 1-1-2, p 1-1-0, r 1-1-0; IV v 1-2-2, p 0-1-1, r 0-1-1; metatarsi I-II v 2-0-0; III v 2-0-2, p 2-0-2, r 1-0-1; IV v 1-1-2, p 2-0-2, r 2-0-2.
Female genitalia ( Figs 4-6 View Figures 1-6 ) Epigyne elongate, with length/width ratio 1.7. Anterior hood twice as long as wide ( Fig. 4 View Figures 1-6 ), atrium elongated as in P. songi . Epigynal plate depressed at the posterior end, posterior ridge (PRE) invaginated from the posterior end having a two-pointed tip at the sides ( Fig. 4 View Figures 1-6 ). As seen in rear view ( Fig. 6 View Figures 1-6 ), PRE U-shaped (as the epigynal plate depressed), which is in an inverted position compared to other Parasyrisca species. Spermathecal ducts directed upwards and curved inwards ( Fig. 5 View Figures 1-6 ). Ducts significantly stronger than that of P. turkenica .
Colouration. Similar to that of male, but carapace with more distinct pattern: three radially directed dark stripes present on both sides of fovea.
Biology. The well-developed chelicerae equipped with strong spines ( Fig. 12 View Figures 12-14 ) suggest that this is a sand-dwelling species. All the adults (as immatures were not considered in the NBmR) were captured between late September and early April. Thus it seems likely that this species overwinters as adults.
Habitat preference. ( Figs 15-17 View Figures 15-17 ) We collected the specimens in the calciferous open sand steppes (coenologic name Festucetum vaginatae danubiale) in the area between the rivers Danube and Tisza and on the Kisalföld.
Distribution. ( Figs 18-19 View Figures 18-19 ) Known from Hungary only. From the type locality (Győrszentiván) and from two collecting sites of the Kiskunság area: Bugac and Orgovány.
ZMUC |
Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |