Anthracinae, Latreille, 1804
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7909975 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1F3087A6-FFCC-FFFF-75D5-FA12FB9AAFFB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anthracinae |
status |
|
Key to tribes and genera of Anthracinae View in CoL
1 R 2+3 originating at an acute angle close to origin of Rs ( Fig. 87 View Figs 87–90 ); face not produced or with oral rim slightly projecting; abdomen conical or elongate ovate; palpi with two segments; male holoptic ..................................................... Aphoebantini …2
– R 2+3 originating at right angles between the origin of Rs and the r-m crossvein ( Figs 88–99 View Figs 87–90 View Figs 91–94 View Figs 95–99 ), exceptionally (some Prorostomatini) arising at an acute angle close to origin of Rs but then face is produced; face projecting or smoothly rounded; abdomen conical, elongate ovate or broad and flattened; palpi with one segment; male dichoptic ............................................................................................................... 5
2 Interradial crossvein complete (3 submarginal cells) ........................................... 3 – Interradial crossvein incomplete (2 submarginal cells) ........................................ 4
3 Cell r 5 closed and stalked; face with hair evenly distributed; frons with erect bristly hair ............................................................................................... Pteraulax Bezzi
– Cell r 5 open; face with a brush of bristly hair at apex; frons with dense scales and fine hair ( Fig. 54 View Figs 51–56 ) ................................................................. Pteraulacodes Hesse
4 Antenna with two flagellomeres: gonocoxae evenly tapered from a broad base; aedeagus conical .................................................................... Aphoebantus Loew
– Antenna with three flagellomeres: gonocoxae broad in basal half, abruptly narrowed in middle and narrow in apical half; aedeagus elongate and narrow ....................... Cononedys Hermann
5 R 2+3 usually originating closer to the origin of Rs than to the r-m crossvein; facial cone strongly developed and distinctly separated from frons ( Fig. 55 View Figs 51–56 ); hind margin of eye usually without a bisecting line; body narrow, elongate ( Fig. 77 View Figs 76–77 ) ................ Prorostomatini …6
– R 2+3 originating closer to r-m crossvein than to Rs or opposite it; face projecting to a variable extent but not distinctly separated from frons or smoothly rounded; hind margin of eye usually with a bisecting line; body narrow, elongate, or broad, abdomen flattened ............................................................................................... 11
6 Interradial crossvein absent (2 submarginal cells)................................................ 7 – Interradial crossvein present (3 submarginal cells) ( Fig. 77 View Figs 76–77 ) ... Stomylomyia Bigot
7 Wing with alula reduced or vestigial and axillary lobe narrow; eye indentation very shallow .................................................................................................................. 8
– Wing with alula and axillary lobe broad; eye indentation shallow or deep and angular ................................................................................................................ 10
8 Wing usually hyaline; R 2+3 without an appendix near its base; fore and mid femora without strong bristles; front claws usually markedly reduced ............................ 9
– Wings with a distinct basicostal infusion; R 2+3 sharply bent near its base and emitting an appendix; all femora with strong bristles; front claws at most only slightly smaller than middle ones .................................................................... Coryprosopa Hesse View in CoL
9 Occiput long behind ocellar triangle, central groove deep and narrower than ocellar triangle (Fig. 57); fore tarsi at least as long as fore tibiae, without distinct spinules below; claws markedly reduced or vestigial; phallosome short and with a large epiphallus .............................................................................. Plesiocera Macquart View in CoL
– Occiput short behind ocellar triangle, central groove as broad as ocellar triangle (Fig. 58); fore tarsi shorter than fore tibiae, with distinct spinules below; front claws scarcely smaller than middle ones; phallosome long and slender, without a prominent epiphallus ................................................................. Conomyza Hesse View in CoL
10 Hind margin of eyes only slightly emarginate; hind margin of scutellum rounded, not shining ............................................................................... Prorostoma Hesse View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |