Laspionchis bourkei Dayrat & Goulding

Dayrat, Benoit, Goulding, Tricia C., Khalil, Munawar, Comendador, Joseph, Xuan, Qu ảng Ngo, Tan, Siong Kiat & Tan, Shau Hwai, 2019, A new genus of air-breathing marine slugs from South-East Asia (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Onchidiidae), ZooKeys 877, pp. 31-80 : 53-59

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.877.36698

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABBC811D-2A6D-4615-9ECF-0F44933BFBE1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AEBEFFC9-8AC4-48E1-A37B-5F1E99EFE75D

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:AEBEFFC9-8AC4-48E1-A37B-5F1E99EFE75D

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Laspionchis bourkei Dayrat & Goulding
status

sp. nov.

Laspionchis bourkei Dayrat & Goulding View in CoL sp. nov. Figs 17 View Figure 17 , 18 View Figure 18 , 19 View Figure 19 , 20 View Figure 20 , 21 View Figure 21 , 22 View Figure 22 , 23 View Figure 23 , 24 View Figure 24 , 25 View Figure 25 , 26 View Figure 26 , 27 View Figure 27 , 28 View Figure 28 , 29 View Figure 29

Holotype.

AUSTRALIA • holotype, designated here, 23/18 mm [1657 H]; Northern Territory, Darwin; 12°33.228'S, 130°52.580'E; 14 Aug. 2012; B Dayrat and party leg.; st 61, on the right side of the road just before bridge to Channel Island, Avicennia mangrove with sandy mud; NTM P.57615.

Additional material examined.

See below for each subspecies.

Distribution

( Fig. 7 View Figure 7 ). Australia (Northern Territory) for L. bourkei bourkei . Indonesia (Ambon) for L. bourkei lateriensis . Indonesia (Sulawesi, Sumatra), Malaysia (Peninsular Malaysia), Singapore, Philippines (Bohol), and Vietnam for L. bourkei matangensis .

Habitat

( Figs 17 View Figure 17 , 26 View Figure 26 ). Laspionchis bourkei is found on mud, hard or soft, in open or dense mangrove forests. It can be locally common across its entire distribution.

Etymology.

Laspionchis bourkei is dedicated to Adam Bourke, from Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, a very knowledgeable mangrove expert and great naturalist, who generously accompanied us in the field around Darwin and showed us good collecting sites.

Diagnosis

(Table 3 View Table ). Externally, Laspionchis bourkei cannot be distinguished from L. boucheti . Internally, however, the long retractor muscle of the penis inserts at the posterior end of the visceral cavity in L. boucheti while the retractor muscle is short (and inserting in the first third of the visceral cavity) in L. bourkei bourkei and vestigial or absent in L. bourkei lateriensis and L. bourkei matangensis . Also, additional, distal, retractor muscle fibers are present in L. boucheti but absent in L. bourkei .

Color and morphology of live animals

( Figs 18 View Figure 18 , 27 View Figure 27 ). Live slugs are covered with mud and their dorsal color can hardly be seen. The background of the dorsal notum is brown, light to dark, homogenous or mottled with darker or lighter areas. The color of the foot is a mix of gray (light or dark) and yellow, as is the color of the hyponotum. The color of the ventral surface (foot and hyponotum) can change rapidly, especially when slugs are disturbed. The ocular tentacles are brown (variable from light to dark) and short (a few millimeters). The number of papillae with dorsal eyes is variable (between five and ten, on average) and they mostly are on the central part of the notum.

Digestive system

( Figs 19 View Figure 19 , 20 View Figure 20 , 25 View Figure 25 ). Examples of radular formulae are in Table 4 View Table . Radulae measure up to 2.9 mm in length (see below for each subspecies). The intestine is long, narrow, and the intestinal loops are exactly between types I and II, i.e., with a transitional loop on average oriented at 6 o’clock, acknowledging minor individual variation ( Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 19 View Figure 19 ).

Reproductive system

( Fig. 21 View Figure 21 ). There is a narrow receptaculum seminis (caecum) along the hermaphroditic duct. The large, ovate-spherical spermatheca connects to the oviduct through a narrow and short duct. The oviduct is straight, slightly larger than the deferent duct or of a similar diameter.

Copulatory apparatus

( Figs 22 View Figure 22 - 24 View Figure 24 , 28 View Figure 28 , 29 View Figure 29 ). The length of the flagellum of the accessory penial gland varies among individuals but it is always heavily coiled. The hollow spine of the penial gland is narrow, straight, elongated. Its base is conical. Its length varies from 0.35 mm to 1 mm (see below for each subspecies). The penial sheath is narrow and short. The penial sheath protects the penis for its entire length. The beginning of the retractor muscle marks the separation between the penial sheath (and the penis inside) and the deferent duct. The retractor muscle is short (as long as the penial sheath) and inserting in the first third of the visceral cavity, vestigial (and free with no attachment), or absent (see below for each subspecies). There is no additional, distal, retractor muscle fibers. The deferent duct is highly convoluted. Inside the penial sheath, the penis is a narrow, thin, elongated, hollow tube, with numerous and densely-arranged (next to each other) hooks in its distal part. Penial hooks are pointed and measure from 15 to 45 μm (see below for each subspecies). When the penis is retracted inside the penial sheath, the hooks are inside the tube-like penis; during copulation, the penis is everted like a glove and the hooks are then on the outside.

Remarks.

A new species name is needed because no existing name applies to the species described here, based on the examination of all the type specimens available in the Onchidiidae , a careful study of all the original descriptions, and our ongoing taxonomic revision of each genus of the family ( Dayrat et al. 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019; Dayrat and Goulding 2017; Goulding et al. 2018a, b, c).

Laspionchis bourkei is divided in three distinct units of which the reciprocal monophyly is highly-supported in both mitochondrial and nuclear analyses (except for L. bourkei matangensis , unresolved using nuclear data). The fact that the three units within L. bourkei are distinct taxa means that they should be recognized and named. Even though we could have ranked them as species, we decided to rank them as sub-species for three main reasons.

(1) The three units within L. bourkei are cryptic externally and internally. Some minor anatomical differences seem to exist but which can hardly be used for identification (Table 3 View Table ).

(2) Ranking the three units within L. bourkei as subspecies rather than species is more in agreement with the genetic distances observed between L. boucheti and L. bourkei . Indeed, the distance gap between L. boucheti and L. bourkei is between 2.5% and 7.5%, while the distance gap between the three L. bourkei units is between 2.5% and 3.9%, clearly suggesting that the three L. bourkei units are much less divergent (their COI sequences) than L. boucheti and L. bourkei , supporting their ranking as subspecies. Distance values should not necessarily be compared from one genus to another, but they can be compared between very closely related species.

(3) As of today, the three units within L. bourkei are allopatric which means that a doubt remains as to whether the three units are reproductively isolated or not. Overall, the three units within L. bourkei probably are relatively young taxa which diverged recently, explaining that they are cryptic internally and that their COI sequences are less divergent than the COI sequences between L. boucheti and L. bourkei .