Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4705.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F534C43A-AB09-4CB3-9B08-FD5BDFD90298 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5586256 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/182387A8-097E-FFB2-51F6-FE470233FDF9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer |
status |
|
Two Spotted or Black Field Cricket
Figs 11–13 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13
1773. Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer. Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire des insectes 3:521. Type locality: Africa, West Tropical Africa, Mali, Mourdiah. Type deposited in ANSP.
Recognition characters and song. Apparently the most widely, naturally distributed Gryllus species found from the tip of South Africa north into Europe and east as far as Thailand ( Otte & Cade 1984). This is a medium-large sized, short hind femur, usually pure black, short or long hind winged cricket with a shiny pronotum. Most males have a pale, yellowish area ( Fig. 11a View FIGURE 11 ) at the base of each tegmen where they attach to the pronotum. Adult females may be without or have a slight indication of pale tegminal areas ( Fig. 11b View FIGURE 11 ). Brown males are known (see Fig. 11 a View FIGURE 11 , and Otte and Cade 1984). Song ( Figs. 12 View FIGURE 12 , 13; R12–14 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 14 ) with 2–6 pulses/chirp, usually 3–5 chirps/second, pulse rate 21–28 at 25°C, dominant frequency 4633–5816 Hz in pet store specimens.
Discussion. As discussed in Weissman et al. (2012), this is one of two non-native US Gryllus (the other being G. locorojo ) that was being commercially raised in 2012 and shipped to US pet food stores for sale to the general public. Such activities will invariably result in the release, either by accident or on purpose, of this species into the environment, similar to what has probably occurred with Acheta domesticus (Weissman et al. 1980) . The effect of such releases is unknown, as is whether or not these crickets can survive and multiply outside of commercial farms. We discussed ( Weissman et al. 2012) why regulatory oversight by federal and state regulatory agencies has been inadequate and suspect that such surveillance has only gotten worse, since 2012, given continued tightening US federal budgets and malaise from both state and federal regulators. Additionally, we have no idea what the current commercial status is for these two species because they are more aggressive and cannibalistic than the replaced A. domesticus , and tend to bite the lizard they are usually being fed to. Thus, the pet-food industry may be voluntarily replacing G. bimaculatus with the ecologically preferred ( Weissman et al. 2012) Gryllodes sigillatus . We present G. bimaculatus here in case they establish feral populations encountered by an inquiring biologist.
DNA. Multilocus 1999-101, from Zimbabwe, maps closest to Old World G. campestris Linnaeus , and at the base of the Gryllus tree along with several other Gryllus taxa ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 , p. 28 View FIGURE 28 ). This position agrees with that seen in more limited 16S mapping (see Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 in Weissman et al. 2012).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Gryllinae |
Genus |